Lester Maddox and the 1972 Presidential Campaign
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 04, 2024, 12:38:31 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  Lester Maddox and the 1972 Presidential Campaign
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Lester Maddox and the 1972 Presidential Campaign  (Read 502 times)
Fuzzy Bear
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,784
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: March 10, 2024, 05:03:25 PM »




This interview is after George Wallace was shot and paralyzed, but before the 1972 Democratic National Convention.  Maddox, at this time, was Lt. Governor of Georgia and was considered an overwhelming favorite to return to the Governorship in 1974.

What is noticeable is Maddox's disdain for Richard Nixon, who he calls a "hypocrite".  His criticism of Nixon is a bit surprising, given his view of McGovern (whom he viewed as almost a Communist). 
Logged
Fuzzy Bear
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,784
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: March 12, 2024, 05:46:46 AM »

The thing I found interesting about this video is that Maddox was definitively NOT a "Democrat for Nixon".  Indeed, he was actually talking about a third party, not about conservative Democrats of his bent merely switching to the GOP.  

Could the American Independent Party (or something like it) have become a regional party, electing its members to Congress and state legislatures?  Or was Maddox just dreaming?  Was the clinging to the Democrats as long as possible inevitable?  Was the switch to the GOP equally inevitable?  Or could a regional party have established itself as the dominant party in a region or subregion?
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,184
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: March 13, 2024, 06:49:55 AM »

I don't see how a segregationist party could have held onto relevancy past the 70s. Integration nationalized the political discourse around race. I think it was inevitable that the south's politics would nationalize as well. I interpret the AIP as an attempt to create a new "southern party" to replace the old Dixiecrats. Thus, with the passage of the Voting Rights Act in 1965, I just do not see how such a party could be sustained; that was the death knell of the era of a single "southern party."
Logged
Fuzzy Bear
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,784
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: March 21, 2024, 08:33:41 PM »

I don't see how a segregationist party could have held onto relevancy past the 70s. Integration nationalized the political discourse around race. I think it was inevitable that the south's politics would nationalize as well. I interpret the AIP as an attempt to create a new "southern party" to replace the old Dixiecrats. Thus, with the passage of the Voting Rights Act in 1965, I just do not see how such a party could be sustained; that was the death knell of the era of a single "southern party."

One would wonder how Lester Maddox would have fared had he had a full-bore campaign on the American Independent Party in 1972.  

I tend to think very poorly.  One problem is that Lester Maddox was nowhere near as charismatic as George Wallace on the stump.  The other is that the 1968 Wallace appeal in the South was due, in part, to the perception that there was "Not a Dime's Worth of Difference" between the two major parties.  That perception of 1968 did not make it into 1972; Nixon vs. McGovern was one of the clearest choices in Presidential candidates in some time (other than Goldwater-LBJ) and Nixon was seen by Southerners who was conservative in the ways that mattered to them.  By 1972, the entire South (save Alabama) had elected Governors who were conservatives (by national standards), but who were going to usher in integration because it was the law.  (Maddox, oddly enough, did a LOT of heavy lifting in integrating Georgia State Government, including the Highway Patrol and the GBI; he was a racist, but he did more integrating of Georgia's government than the more moderate Carl Sanders.)

The issue is whether or not Maddox might have swung a state to a Democrat in a 3 way race.  To me, that answer is a fat "NO!".
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 11 queries.