Why did Gore have no serious opponents?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 09:02:31 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results
  2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Why did Gore have no serious opponents?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why did Gore have no serious opponents?  (Read 261 times)
Samof94
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,346
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 07, 2024, 07:10:58 AM »

Why didn't a proto-Sanders or some other serious challenger emerge against Gore and decide to run in 1999??
Logged
TheTide
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,662
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 07, 2024, 07:49:18 AM »

Bradley was a serious opponent, just not a very successful one.
Logged
Benjamin Frank 2.0
Frank 2.0
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,106
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 25, 2024, 02:45:15 PM »

There were several others who were planning to run or might have considered running but one by one they fell by the wayside.

1.Jesse Jackson was planning to run but I think the media told him they wouldn't hold back on reporting on his affairs like they did previously.

2.Paul Wellstone suffered a back injury shortly before the 2000 primary.

3.Bob Kerrey was going to run again and I forget why he didn't.

4.I don't know if George Mitchell was going to run or not but he was persuaded by the Clinton Administration to work on the peace accord over Northern Ireland instead.

5.There was one more who was mentioned, can't remember.
Logged
Pres Mike
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,361
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 25, 2024, 06:26:34 PM »

The election wasn't expected to be close. Bush was leading polls since 1997, often by a lot. He was seen as the de facto president elect by most Americans in the late 90s. Most serious Democrats didn't see the point contesting the nomination.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 13 queries.