This is the 2032 map. What happened?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 07:05:17 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  This is the 2032 map. What happened?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: This is the 2032 map. What happened?  (Read 399 times)
Schiff for Senate
CentristRepublican
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,247
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 25, 2023, 03:40:35 AM »
« edited: December 25, 2023, 03:01:35 PM by CentristRepublican »



Close states: FL (R+6.7), NE01 (R+6.4), TX (R+4.6), KS (R+3.7), PA (R+2.6), AZ (R+2.3), AK (R+1.7), ME02 (R+1.6), NV (R+0.9), MI (R+0.2), NC (D+0.1), WI (D+0.4), NH (D+4.5)
Selected other results: NJ (D+24.5), NY (D+18.7), NE (R+9.7), OR (D+11.0), HI (D+43.7)
Logged
°Leprechaun
tmcusa2
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,184
Uruguay


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 25, 2023, 08:31:53 AM »

Depending on who wins in 2024 this could be a plausible map.
Right now, Democrats may have a slight disadvantage.
If a Democrat is elected in 2028, they may have an advantage in 2032.
My prediction is that 2024, 2028, and  2032 will be be close elections.
The Democrats will have a disadvantage in 2032 if there are no significant shifts in swing states.
Democrats may have an advantage if the GOP becomes less popular.
Logged
°Leprechaun
tmcusa2
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,184
Uruguay


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 25, 2023, 08:36:39 AM »
« Edited: December 25, 2023, 08:40:28 AM by °Leprechaun »



Close states: FL (R+6.7), NE01 (R+6.4), TX (R+4.6), KS (R+3.7), PA (R+2.6), AZ (R+2.3), AK (R+1.7), ME02 (R+1.6), NV (R+0.9), MI (R+0.2), NC (D+0.1), WI (D+0.4), NH (D+4.5)
Selected other results: NJ (D+24.5), NY (D+18.7), NE (R+9.7), OR (D+11.0), HI (D+43.7)

Is it possible that the population  projections could be slightly off and this would be a 269-269 tie?

By the way, we will likely see a lot of threads about 2028 before November.
Logged
Schiff for Senate
CentristRepublican
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,247
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 25, 2023, 02:57:48 PM »
« Edited: December 25, 2023, 03:02:20 PM by CentristRepublican »



Close states: FL (R+6.7), NE01 (R+6.4), TX (R+4.6), KS (R+3.7), PA (R+2.6), AZ (R+2.3), AK (R+1.7), ME02 (R+1.6), NV (R+0.9), MI (R+0.2), NC (D+0.1), WI (D+0.4), NH (D+4.5)
Selected other results: NJ (D+24.5), NY (D+18.7), NE (R+9.7), OR (D+11.0), HI (D+43.7)

Is it possible that the population  projections could be slightly off and this would be a 269-269 tie?

By the way, we will likely see a lot of threads about 2028 before November.


It's possible. Overall delta is:
ID: +1
AZ: +1
MT: -1
TX: +1
FL: +1
MI: -1
GA: +1
MN: -1
AL: -1
RI: -1

ID and MT cancel out, AZ and AL cancel out, MN and GA cancel out, MI and FL cancel out. TX (R) gains a district, at the expense of RI (D).

So under the 2020 numbers it would be a 269-269 tie. If that net balance remained in the 2030s, it would be a tie still. But states like TX and FL are guaranteed to gain districts, while some combination of MN, NY, CA, IL, PA, RI probably gonna lose some seats (although AL, MI and OH will too). So I'd expect the reallocation to benefit the GOP.


Anyway I did edit some of the numbers again: NJ -1, KS +1, CA -1, OH -1, NC +1, NY -2, MT +1 (so back to irl), AZ +1 (so +2 from irl) and CO +1.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 11 queries.