Computational “theory of everything” for quantum spacetime and mathematics

[Blue3]

I’m trying to understand this…

some kind of computational “theory of everything” for quantum spacetime and mathematics??

[MEDIA=youtube]fLMZAHyrpyo[/MEDIA]

https://youtu.be/fLMZAHyrpyo?si=1q4kTLWooudeh3vc

[vitoNova]

The Theory of Everything.
What is dark matter?
What is dark energy?
Entropy.
Do gravitons exist?
Do protons disintegrate? 
What is time?
Is math a human construct, or does it exist independently in nature?

But the most fundamental question that everyone should be asking is:

why does cause and effect exist?

[Antonio the Sixth]

Most proposed "theories of everything" are pseudoscience and even those that aren't are completely untested thus far. There are some I like on an aesthetic or metaphysical level (like, I get why so many physicists were taken in by string theory for so long even if it proved to be a dead end) but I'd recommend against taking the exercise too seriously.

[IndianAmericanRepublican]

don't these kinds of things always get hyped up but fall apart under scrutiny? I expect to never see a true theory of everything in my lifetime.

[Blue3]

So far, it all depends on how test-able it is, which narrow predictions it (and only it) can make and if they come true after experiments.

After more reading, it seems more of a stretch, but we'll see if he comes up with something testable.

At least he's getting other scientists to talk about it, and think of some new ideas.

[Meclazine for Israel]

He works with modelling atomic systems using computational physics.

He has not achieved his job as a scientist which is to make complex models understandable by a normal layperson. The talk is borderline uninterpretable. He should have included some more animations which normal people could relate to.

He is an academic who makes models which would help describe predicted behaviours of a system based on a series of input parameters. The software then mimics the laws of physics and you let it go.

Predicting the number of times a ping pong ball bounces on a table before it falls off would be a simple example.

His ideas are extremely esoteric, but useful for understanding sub atomic physics, galaxy sized systems where your only real method of analysis is modelling.

For example, we cannot make a black hole. This guy's modelling can show you roughly how they come about.

[vitoNova]

Why does this thing cause another?

Once you have discovered this, you have discovered the Hand of God.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

The idea is to merge theories together and predict something different from the standard model. The problem is that it's very hard to have something you can test that is different.  There have been cases where theories were unified. Relativity was able to unify electricity and magnetism into one force, and then later the weak nuclear force was unified with it into the electroweak force.