Describe a Parker 1904/Hoover 1932 voter
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 11:09:05 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Describe a Parker 1904/Hoover 1932 voter
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Describe a Parker 1904/Hoover 1932 voter  (Read 855 times)
Blow by blow, the passion dies
LeonelBrizola
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,517
Brazil


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 19, 2023, 02:18:57 PM »

Maybe a xenophobic Democrat in IN or OH? Parker won several counties there after all.
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,659
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 19, 2023, 03:26:06 PM »

Parker was one of the last laissez faire Democrats on economics, right?  If so, it's totally reasonable someone high up in the business world back then would support both Parker over Teddy Roosevelt and Hoover over Franklin Roosevelt for that reason.
Logged
Blow by blow, the passion dies
LeonelBrizola
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,517
Brazil


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 19, 2023, 04:22:58 PM »

Parker was one of the last laissez faire Democrats on economics, right?  If so, it's totally reasonable someone high up in the business world back then would support both Parker over Teddy Roosevelt and Hoover over Franklin Roosevelt for that reason.
Parker had highly vague political beliefs, and was the least remarkable major-party nominee in US history, so there's likely not much.
Logged
E-Dawg
Guy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 556
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 24, 2023, 03:02:09 PM »

Some Northeastern Copperhead counties voted this way, such as Schoharie NY, Sussex NJ, & Hunterdon NJ,
Logged
wnwnwn
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,579
Peru


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 08, 2023, 11:00:15 AM »

Some old third party system style northern conservadems
Logged
TDAS04
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,527
Bhutan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 08, 2023, 12:23:32 PM »

Someone who just hated anyone named "Roosevelt."
Logged
darklordoftech
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,442
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 09, 2023, 07:13:17 PM »

Parker was one of the last laissez faire Democrats on economics, right?  If so, it's totally reasonable someone high up in the business world back then would support both Parker over Teddy Roosevelt and Hoover over Franklin Roosevelt for that reason.
Logged
Alben Barkley
KYWildman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,282
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.97, S: -5.74

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 09, 2023, 07:19:07 PM »

Someone who just hated anyone named "Roosevelt."

On this note, someone who really hates the Dutch.
Logged
Sumner 1868
Maps are a good thing
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,075
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 09, 2023, 09:02:35 PM »

Gold standard purists?
Logged
Vice President Christian Man
Christian Man
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,523
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -2.26

P P P

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: November 09, 2023, 09:08:06 PM »

Parker was one of the last laissez faire Democrats on economics, right?
That's a commonly believed misconception, but he only seemed that way because both him and Roosevelt were progressive; he actually attacked Roosevelt from the left for not doing enough economically. The only laissez-faire Democrat until at least 1976 was John Davis.
Logged
TransfemmeGoreVidal
Fulbright DNC
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,444
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: November 10, 2023, 01:15:46 AM »

Copperheads
Logged
I Will Not Be Wrong
outofbox6
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,351
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: November 13, 2023, 09:02:18 PM »

A Democrat who strongly supported Prohibition.

Also, perhaps Al Smith?
Logged
Alben Barkley
KYWildman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,282
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.97, S: -5.74

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: November 14, 2023, 12:24:57 AM »

A Democrat who strongly supported Prohibition.

Also, perhaps Al Smith?

Smith campaigned for Roosevelt in 1932 and didn't turn on him until later.
Logged
E-Dawg
Guy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 556
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: November 14, 2023, 01:47:34 AM »

The only laissez-faire Democrat until at least 1976 was John Davis.
What about Al Smith, who turned against the New Deal and endorsed Landon & Willkie?
Logged
Alben Barkley
KYWildman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,282
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.97, S: -5.74

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: November 14, 2023, 01:48:18 AM »

The only laissez-faire Democrat until at least 1976 was John Davis.
What about Al Smith, who turned against the New Deal and endorsed Landon & Willkie?

As I just said, not in 1932 though.
Logged
E-Dawg
Guy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 556
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: November 14, 2023, 01:50:29 AM »

The only laissez-faire Democrat until at least 1976 was John Davis.
What about Al Smith, who turned against the New Deal and endorsed Landon & Willkie?

As I just said, not in 1932 though.
I knew Smith supported FDR in 1932, I was asking if Smith was a "laissez-faire Democrat" considering his opposition to the New Deal.
Logged
Alben Barkley
KYWildman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,282
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.97, S: -5.74

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: November 14, 2023, 01:55:57 AM »

The only laissez-faire Democrat until at least 1976 was John Davis.
What about Al Smith, who turned against the New Deal and endorsed Landon & Willkie?

As I just said, not in 1932 though.
I knew Smith supported FDR in 1932, I was asking if Smith was a "laissez-faire Democrat" considering his opposition to the New Deal.

Not exactly, he was a progressive Democrat, but he had different ideas about the relationship between business and government than FDR. One could also argue that he was actually more motivated by bitterness over FDR beating him out for the nomination in 1932 and basically pushing him out of the spotlight as the king of urban Democrats while also being far more successful at winning over Southern/rural voters.

Oh also the idea that Carter or any major post-1976 Democrat was "laissez faire" is utterly ridiculous, but that's another story.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.044 seconds with 11 queries.