How common are "check and balance" voters really?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 08:50:52 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  How common are "check and balance" voters really?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: How common are "check and balance" voters really?  (Read 338 times)
WalterWhite
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,990
United States
Political Matrix
E: -9.35, S: -9.83

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 13, 2023, 05:37:42 AM »

Are "check and balance" voters really that common? By "check and balance" voter, I mean someone who ALWAYS splits their ticket to ensure checks and balances. Is this really a big phenomenon in US elections?
Logged
Benjamin Frank
Frank
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,069


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 13, 2023, 05:45:29 AM »

With partisanship these days, probably not at all.

1.I think you can see that at the state level. Being Canadian, it's completely foreign to me that there are so many one party state governments. No matter how unpopular the governing party may be there is zero chance in states like Alabama, Idaho, California, Florida.. that the governing party could actually lose.

There are, of course, the handful of remaining competitive states (and a handful of states like Texas may be becoming more competitive,) and there are, especially in New England, Democratic voters who seem to like balancing their large Democratic majorities in the legislature with (sane) Republican governors.

2.This used to be much more the case. In 1996 Republicans explicitely gave up on their Presidential nominee Bob Dole and asked voters to vote for Republicans for Congress as a check and balance on President Bill Clinton although, the Democrats actually narrowly won the aggregate U.S House popular vote in 1996 even as the Republicans held the House.
Logged
Sir Mohamed
MohamedChalid
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,714
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 13, 2023, 09:36:58 AM »

A few still exist in certain states, though their number has significantly declined over the last two decades.

I'm sure there were a decent number of them in ME who voted for Biden and Collins, to "keep a check on him".
Logged
TML
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,445


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 13, 2023, 12:37:02 PM »
« Edited: September 13, 2023, 12:40:47 PM by TML »

A few still exist in certain states, though their number has significantly declined over the last two decades.

I'm sure there were a decent number of them in ME who voted for Biden and Collins, to "keep a check on him".

In terms of Biden/Collins voters (and this may also apply to some other contests, such as Trump/Bullock 2016 voters), I think a greater reason for such ticket splitting is not "check and balance," but rather downballot incumbents running for reelection and sufficiently localizing their races & retaining their popularity to win over many ticket-splitters (Indeed, newspaper reports from Maine in 2020 indicated that many Biden/Collins voters were turned off by the campaign tactics of Collins' challenger; exit polls showed that 23% of Biden voters viewed Gideon unfavorably, and 18% of Biden voters voted for Collins.).
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.03 seconds with 11 queries.