Who would have won the NH primary and NV caucus if Sanders didn’t run?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 04:29:51 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  Who would have won the NH primary and NV caucus if Sanders didn’t run?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Who would have won the NH primary and NV caucus if Sanders didn’t run?  (Read 2046 times)
darklordoftech
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,438
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 07, 2023, 04:24:14 PM »

What do you think?
Logged
WalterWhite
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,990
United States
Political Matrix
E: -9.35, S: -9.83

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 07, 2023, 04:31:32 PM »

Elizabeth Warren, the second-most prominent progressive in the 2020 Democratic Primary, probably would have won those states. I cannot see the Sanders vote going to anyone else.
Logged
Sol
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,147
Bosnia and Herzegovina


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 09, 2023, 12:10:13 AM »

Elizabeth Warren, the second-most prominent progressive in the 2020 Democratic Primary, probably would have won those states. I cannot see the Sanders vote going to anyone else.

Ehh, I don't know about that; from what I remember of the time there was a non-negligible chunk of Bernie voters whose second preference was Biden. Nevada could easily have been a Biden win.
Logged
WalterWhite
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,990
United States
Political Matrix
E: -9.35, S: -9.83

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 09, 2023, 06:06:11 AM »

Elizabeth Warren, the second-most prominent progressive in the 2020 Democratic Primary, probably would have won those states. I cannot see the Sanders vote going to anyone else.

Ehh, I don't know about that; from what I remember of the time there was a non-negligible chunk of Bernie voters whose second preference was Biden. Nevada could easily have been a Biden win.

That was probably because Sanders and Warren attacked each other viciously during campaign season. In the absence of that, Sanders supporters would probably choose the progressive Warren over the centrist Biden.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,856
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: September 09, 2023, 08:25:41 AM »

Elizabeth Warren, the second-most prominent progressive in the 2020 Democratic Primary, probably would have won those states. I cannot see the Sanders vote going to anyone else.

Ehh, I don't know about that; from what I remember of the time there was a non-negligible chunk of Bernie voters whose second preference was Biden. Nevada could easily have been a Biden win.

That was probably because Sanders and Warren attacked each other viciously during campaign season. In the absence of that, Sanders supporters would probably choose the progressive Warren over the centrist Biden.

Some probably would. But the nihilist crowd who wanted to see everything burn would probably find Warren too timid and establishment-flavored.
Logged
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,207
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: September 09, 2023, 09:15:52 AM »

NH:  Either Buttjudge or Warren

NV: Biden
Logged
Sol
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,147
Bosnia and Herzegovina


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: September 09, 2023, 12:32:31 PM »

That was probably because Sanders and Warren attacked each other viciously during campaign season. In the absence of that, Sanders supporters would probably choose the progressive Warren over the centrist Biden.

I think you're making the mistake of assuming that Sanders supporters were all ideologically committed lefties who would default to the most left-wing candidate. A good chunk of them were but Bernie also won lots of people who were not as strongly ideological through strong outreach (especially in immigrant and non-English speaking communities), his personal likeability, his anti-establishment ethos, name recognition, etc.

Warren had very poor outreach to non-white voters and ran a campaign designed to appeal to PhDs , which undercuts the anti-establishment elements of her campaign as well. I personally find Warren to be charismatic, but I'm much more her target demo than the typical Sanders voter.
Logged
SWE
SomebodyWhoExists
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,313
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: September 09, 2023, 03:00:38 PM »

Elizabeth Warren, the second-most prominent progressive in the 2020 Democratic Primary, probably would have won those states. I cannot see the Sanders vote going to anyone else.

Ehh, I don't know about that; from what I remember of the time there was a non-negligible chunk of Bernie voters whose second preference was Biden. Nevada could easily have been a Biden win.

That was probably because Sanders and Warren attacked each other viciously during campaign season. In the absence of that, Sanders supporters would probably choose the progressive Warren over the centrist Biden.
No, polling usually showed Sanders voters tended to indicate Biden as their second choice (and vice versa) from the beginning, long before things were anything other than friendly between Bernie and Warren
Logged
SInNYC
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,216


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: September 11, 2023, 09:25:11 AM »

On a political blog, people are obviously going to be picking by ideology (so, Warren).

But voters, especially in primaries (vs caucuses), often have other reasons including identity and likeability. Those who go for identity will pick another old straight white male (Biden). For likeability, the usual criterion is the beer test though I'm not sure that really applies to Bernie voters. But many liked his authenticity, and again I think Biden was perceived as the most authentic candidate of those that remained, with Warren second.
Logged
Electric Circus
Jr. Member
***
Posts: leet
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: September 15, 2023, 07:29:55 AM »

1. What does this imply about Iowa?

We can assume that Warren does somewhat better in Sanders absence, not just because she would pick up a disproportionate share of his support, but also because without him in the race, she's spared the series of embarrassing squabbles that the two had over the winter.

Sol's point about less ideological Sanders supporters is well taken, but there's also organizational talent that would have swung toward Warren in his absence, which would have helped with turning out less ideological voters. In any case, Warren had a strong ground game in Iowa and the state has demographics that minimize some of her vulnerabilities.

All of which is to say, I think it's highly likely that Warren overcomes Buttigieg's 2.8% margin over her and wins Iowa - unambiguously.

Buttigieg doesn't get to claim a tie, and exits Iowa looking less viable. Joe Biden probably still disappoints. Turnout is lower in the absence of Bernie's operation.


2. How does that affect the relative position of candidates going into New Hampshire?

This leaves voters in New Hampshire with just a handful of real options. No one has mentioned Amy Klobuchar yet, but she might reap more benefit from being the last lower-risk choice standing as an alternative to a seemingly lethargic Biden. She might also benefit from being a more compelling foil to Warren.

We know that Warren is vulnerable to overreach and self-sabotage in moments of strength. And we know what the dynamic in New Hampshire is like. It's hard to imagine her making a smooth transition from winning Iowa. I think that Klobuchar would have a huge opportunity.


3. Where does this leave the rest of the campaign?

Warren probably wins Nevada, but I can see the case for Biden doing marginally better there as well.

Biden still dominates South Carolina, but Warren and Klobuchar make the delegate math on Super Tuesday more interesting with a thinner field.
Logged
Kleine Scheiße
PeteHam
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,778
United States


Political Matrix
E: -9.16, S: -1.74

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: September 18, 2023, 06:06:41 PM »

There's a non-zero possibility this could have meant Beto stayed in the race for longer. Whether that would have meant anything, I don't know.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,785


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: September 19, 2023, 01:05:49 PM »

If Sanders doesn't run, there's never an impetus to consolidate around a candidate to stop him. I honestly don't think Biden is nominated in this scenario, but either Klobuchar or Buttigieg.
Logged
Snowstalker Mk. II
Snowstalker
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,414
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -4.35

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: September 19, 2023, 01:27:01 PM »

I'm also inclined to think that someone else would fill a sort of left-populist bent (as opposed to the wonkier Warren campaign whose supporters were much more like Buttigieg's than Sanders'). Maybe it would be Yang, maybe it would be someone who didn't run IOTL like Ro Khanna or Sherrod Brown.
Logged
SnowLabrador
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,577
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: September 20, 2023, 09:50:56 AM »

I'm also inclined to think that someone else would fill a sort of left-populist bent (as opposed to the wonkier Warren campaign whose supporters were much more like Buttigieg's than Sanders'). Maybe it would be Yang, maybe it would be someone who didn't run IOTL like Ro Khanna or Sherrod Brown.

There's no way Sherrod Brown was ever going to give up his seat for DeWine to fill with a Republican. If he leaves the Senate, it's going to be via losing reelection.
Logged
MARGINS6729
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 385
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: December 22, 2023, 10:56:34 PM »

Warren may have gotten the neighbor state boost in New Hampshire. But NV is trickier to say.
Logged
Pres Mike
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,346
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: December 26, 2023, 09:53:11 PM »

Elizabeth Warren, the second-most prominent progressive in the 2020 Democratic Primary, probably would have won those states. I cannot see the Sanders vote going to anyone else.

Ehh, I don't know about that; from what I remember of the time there was a non-negligible chunk of Bernie voters whose second preference was Biden. Nevada could easily have been a Biden win.

That was probably because Sanders and Warren attacked each other viciously during campaign season. In the absence of that, Sanders supporters would probably choose the progressive Warren over the centrist Biden.
Nah, it was the classic beer vs wine paths.

A good portion of Bernie supporters just wanted a white man lol. Hence Bernie losing support from 2016 to 2020 even when it became a two man race
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.051 seconds with 12 queries.