Will Another Politician Ever Be Nominated to SCOTUS?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 09:02:23 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Will Another Politician Ever Be Nominated to SCOTUS?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Will Another Politician Ever Be Nominated to SCOTUS?  (Read 996 times)
electionsguy259
Rookie
**
Posts: 60
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 10, 2023, 07:40:26 PM »

One thing that stuck out at me while reading articles dealing with the history of the Supreme Court is that many former SCOTUS justices had been politicians prior to being named to the Court (such as Salmon Chase, William Howard Taft, Hugo Black, and Frank Murphy). This practice has mostly disappeared; the most recent SCOTUS to have had elected experience was Sandra Day O'Connor (1981). Does anyone see actual politicians, on either side of the aisle, being nominated to the Supreme Court anytime soon?
Logged
NewYorkExpress
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,817
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 10, 2023, 07:50:15 PM »

Kamala Harris might end up on the Court if Democrats still control the Senate after 2026...if Sotomayor or Roberts retires at that point. (I imagine Biden is well aware that Harris would lose the 2028 Presidential Election and would nominate her to avoid seeing her take a career ending loss).
Logged
Del Tachi
Republican95
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,839
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: 1.46

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 11, 2023, 03:22:06 PM »

Yeah, Biden should appoint Harris to Sotomayor's seat when/if she retires next year.  It's great pretense for dropping her in favor of someone who has actual 2028 potential (i.e., Whitmer, Warnock, Moore, Shapiro, etc.)

Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,652
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 11, 2023, 06:41:34 PM »

Yeah, Biden should appoint Harris to Sotomayor's seat when/if she retires next year.  It's great pretense for dropping her in favor of someone who has actual 2028 potential (i.e., Whitmer, Warnock, Moore, Shapiro, etc.)



Never going to happen.  Automatic loss of senate seat.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,423


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 12, 2023, 12:12:25 PM »
« Edited: August 12, 2023, 12:16:30 PM by Command of what? There's no one here. »

Yeah, Biden should appoint Harris to Sotomayor's seat when/if she retires next year.  It's great pretense for dropping her in favor of someone who has actual 2028 potential (i.e., Whitmer, Warnock, Moore, Shapiro, etc.)



Never going to happen.  Automatic loss of senate seat.

Yep. If this happens, which is very unlikely, the replacement will be a governor rather than a senator. Gun to my head I'd name the strongest possibilities as Moore, Polis, Pritzker, Shapiro, and Whitmer, in no particular order but maybe with Whitmer slightly above and Polis slightly below the other three. (I get that Gavin Newsom is a strong national performer but I think a lot of people really overestimate how much respect other major Democratic politicians have for him.)
Logged
Ferguson97
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,116
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 12, 2023, 02:04:07 PM »

All judges are politicians, but yes. "Ever" is a very long time.
Logged
Vosem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,633
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.13, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: August 19, 2023, 08:54:22 PM »

We came very close to this in 2016-17, since apparently Bannon really wanted Trump to nominate Ted Cruz to the Scalia/Gorsuch SCOTUS seat as a grand party reunification gesture (a la Obama picking Hillary to be Secretary of State), but Cruz was unwilling to go for it. (Which, IMO, showed him to be a profoundly unserious figure).

So I think it remains on the table, and it'll be on the table for a while, but it gets less likely as the political class comes to be less full of lawyers, which I think is the long-term trend on both sides.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.04 seconds with 11 queries.