PPP Beshear leads +8
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 08:29:31 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections
  2023 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  PPP Beshear leads +8
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: PPP Beshear leads +8  (Read 828 times)
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,763
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 10, 2023, 12:44:51 PM »

https://twitter.com/Politics_Polls/status/1689683664387416079?s=20
Logged
Mad Deadly Worldwide Communist Gangster Computer God
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,278
Norway


Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -7.48

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 10, 2023, 12:51:40 PM »

Important to note that this is an internal. Still, Beshear isn't leading by this much but 49% isn't a bad number!
Logged
Roll Roons
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,041
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 10, 2023, 12:59:05 PM »

I do think Beshear is favored, but PPP is trash.
Logged
President Johnson
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,918
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.70


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 10, 2023, 01:13:06 PM »

A little bullish, I guess. The most case scenario would be result similar to North Carolina 2020 or Montana 2016.
Logged
GM Team Member and Senator WB
weatherboy1102
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,861
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.61, S: -7.83

P
WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 10, 2023, 01:34:38 PM »

Internal usually means shift it 3-4 points towards the opponent which gives either a narrow Beshear lead or a tied race which is more how I feel it is now.
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,280


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 10, 2023, 02:32:59 PM »

Beshear approval: 58/39 (+19)

Beshear fav: 56/40 (+16)
Cameron fav: 42/44 (-2)

Honestly given the other polling we've seen of KY, this approval actually seems much lower.
Logged
BigZuck08
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,091
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.13, S: 1.22

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: August 10, 2023, 07:33:31 PM »

This is a Beshear intern, so I think Beshear's lead is much lower here, but I still think he will win re-election.

Lean D.
Logged
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,214
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: August 10, 2023, 08:30:50 PM »

Yeah, Beshear getting to 49% seems reasonable, polls have been quite good at getting the number a Dem will get, win or lose.
Logged
Alben Barkley
KYWildman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,282
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.97, S: -5.74

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: August 11, 2023, 04:29:34 PM »

This may be a Beshear internal, but even the Cameron internals and R pollsters show a Beshear lead. Combined with him being near 50, he’s clearly favored.

This despite an annoying onslaught of ads on our TV down here which, predictably, accuse Beshear of supporting sex changes for children.
Logged
Pericles
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,111


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: August 11, 2023, 05:44:49 PM »

That's the kind of lead that has some protection from the polling errors that happen in that region. Another very close result like 2019 looks very plausible though.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.039 seconds with 12 queries.