Schmitz '72: like Wallace at all?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 03:16:35 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Schmitz '72: like Wallace at all?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Schmitz '72: like Wallace at all?  (Read 3018 times)
TommyC1776
KucinichforPrez
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,162


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: March 19, 2007, 05:08:11 PM »

Was John G. Schmitz like George Wallace at all on any of the issues?  Like was Schmitz for segregation?  Did Schmitz take votes away from McGovern or Nixon?  Did the media acknowledge him alot at all?
Logged
Dr. Cynic
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,450
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.11, S: -6.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: March 19, 2007, 07:14:54 PM »

I know that Schmitz was a John Birch Society member... And was ultraconservative... He would've sucked more hardcore rightwingers away from Nixon... Of the three, Nixon was seen as most moderate...

Schmitz was also a California Representative who had spent some time in Congress. He would've had a decent organization... As far as media coverage... I have no idea... I wasn't alive, lol.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,724
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: March 19, 2007, 07:28:33 PM »

He was basically an out and out fascist.
Logged
Colin
ColinW
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,684
Papua New Guinea


Political Matrix
E: 3.87, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: March 19, 2007, 07:28:52 PM »

I would have to agree with Dr. Cynic. I believe that Schmitz was completely different from Wallace in many respects. While both were social conservatives Wallace was much more from the old Dixiecrat mold than Schmitz, who was basically an ultraconservative anti-Communist or basically a fascist. While Wallace ran a working class populist campaign Schmitz just tried to get as many votes from the far right as possible by working through organizations such as the Council of Conservative Citizens and the John Birch Society. So no I don't think there was much overlap between Wallace and Schmitz. Schmitz used that old third party idea and used an already proven ballot line to run a completely different campaign much like Buchanan's use of the Reform ticket in 2000.
Logged
Dr. Cynic
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,450
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.11, S: -6.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: March 19, 2007, 07:39:30 PM »

I would have to agree with Dr. Cynic. I believe that Schmitz was completely different from Wallace in many respects. While both were social conservatives Wallace was much more from the old Dixiecrat mold than Schmitz, who was basically an ultraconservative anti-Communist or basically a fascist. While Wallace ran a working class populist campaign Schmitz just tried to get as many votes from the far right as possible by working through organizations such as the Council of Conservative Citizens and the John Birch Society. So no I don't think there was much overlap between Wallace and Schmitz. Schmitz used that old third party idea and used an already proven ballot line to run a completely different campaign much like Buchanan's use of the Reform ticket in 2000.

Wallace was still very much an economic Democrat... The American Independant Party was basically a mix of those two philosophies. Colin summed it up alot better than I did... lol.
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,300
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: March 19, 2007, 07:46:04 PM »
« Edited: March 19, 2007, 07:50:58 PM by nclib »

Would it be accurate to say that Wallace was more of an old-fashioned conservative and Schmitz was more of a militia-type right-winger? Therefore, Wallace's best states were Southern, and Schmitz's best areas were in the Interior West.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,724
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: March 19, 2007, 07:54:35 PM »

Also no; Wallace's economic platform in '68 was quite left-wing.
Logged
True Democrat
true democrat
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,368
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.10, S: -2.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: March 19, 2007, 08:59:46 PM »

Just an interesting fact: Schmitz was the father of Mary Kay Letourneau.
Logged
Colin
ColinW
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,684
Papua New Guinea


Political Matrix
E: 3.87, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: March 20, 2007, 10:56:28 AM »

Would it be accurate to say that Wallace was more of an old-fashioned conservative and Schmitz was more of a militia-type right-winger? Therefore, Wallace's best states were Southern, and Schmitz's best areas were in the Interior West.

Absolutely not. The belief that Wallace was conservative is one of the great myths of American politics. Like I said earlier he was a Dixiecrat in all senses of the word, he was economically left-wing and very populist. He basically ran a hawkish, law and order Democratic campaign.

As for Schmitz there were no militia-type right wingers in 1972. He was a John Bircher and basically an out and out fascist.
Logged
Adlai Stevenson
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,403
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: March 20, 2007, 11:48:30 AM »

Schmitz got almost 10% of the vote in Idaho - why was his campaign especially strong there?
Logged
Rob
Bob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,277
United States
Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -9.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: March 20, 2007, 12:42:56 PM »

Schmitz got almost 10% of the vote in Idaho - why was his campaign especially strong there?

Idaho had more Birchers per capita than any other state, and they turned out in force for their comrade.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: March 20, 2007, 01:43:20 PM »

He was basically an out and out fascist.
Who? Schmitz or Nixon? Wink
Would it be accurate to say that Wallace was more of an old-fashioned conservative and Schmitz was more of a militia-type right-winger? Therefore, Wallace's best states were Southern, and Schmitz's best areas were in the Interior West.

Absolutely not. The belief that Wallace was conservative is one of the great myths of American politics. Like I said earlier he was a Dixiecrat in all senses of the word, he was economically left-wing and very populist. He basically ran a hawkish, law and order Democratic campaign.

As for Schmitz there were no militia-type right wingers in 1972. He was a John Bircher and basically an out and out fascist.
The idea that (all, or even most) Dixiecrats were economically left-wing and very populist, though, is another one of the great myths of American politics. Tongue
Logged
TommyC1776
KucinichforPrez
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,162


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: March 20, 2007, 05:20:22 PM »

What's a John Bircher?  like what type of an orginazation is it?  Also, what's a facist?  Isn't that a dictator?
Logged
Colin
ColinW
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,684
Papua New Guinea


Political Matrix
E: 3.87, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: March 20, 2007, 08:39:12 PM »


A member of the John Birch Society.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

The John Birch Society is an anti-communist organization that was founded in the late 1950's and was prominent in far right-wing circles until the late 70's. They were a group of rabidly anti-communist conspiracy nuts who actually gained a rather wide membership for such a fringe group.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Birch_Society

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

A fascist, in its most broad description, is a person who is very socially authoritarian and mostly anti-democracy. Specifically fascism was originally one who supported the ideas of Benito Mussolini and the Italian Fascist Party but its current usage is basically to describe all right-wing authoritarians and those on the right who are anti-democracy and in favour of a dictatorial or strongman government. Basically fascist has become the right-wing version of left-wing communism. While a dictator can be a fascist, a fascist can be any sort of person and it describes a political ideology not a particular position within a government.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism
Logged
CARLHAYDEN
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,638


Political Matrix
E: 1.38, S: -0.51

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: March 20, 2007, 08:47:05 PM »

Schmitz was a politician with a sense of humor (all too rare).

Let me give your two examples:

When asked why he joined the JBS, Schmitz replied that he was elected from Orange county, so he had to join some moderate organization.

In 1972, when departing from a flight at John Wayne, Schmitz saw a man standing in the crowd wearing a brown suit.  Schmitz siddled up to him and said, 'I didn't know we were supposed to show up in uniform.'
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: March 22, 2007, 06:46:26 AM »

Nice attack Colin. Throwing the word "fascist" around about a conservative is not unexpected around here and especially not from a liberal such as yourself.
Logged
Colin
ColinW
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,684
Papua New Guinea


Political Matrix
E: 3.87, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: March 22, 2007, 11:06:54 AM »

Nice attack Colin. Throwing the word "fascist" around about a conservative is not unexpected around here and especially not from a liberal such as yourself.

I'm sorry but most John Birchers cross the line from conservatism into authoritarianism in my book with the John Birch Societies latent anti-Semitism, conspiracy theories and completely outrageous claims.
Logged
Rob
Bob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,277
United States
Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -9.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: March 22, 2007, 11:09:56 AM »

most John Birchers cross the line from conservatism into authoritarianism

What's the difference Huh
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: March 22, 2007, 11:21:16 AM »

Nice attack Colin. Throwing the word "fascist" around about a conservative is not unexpected around here and especially not from a liberal such as yourself.

I'm sorry but most John Birchers cross the line from conservatism into authoritarianism in my book with the John Birch Societies latent anti-Semitism, conspiracy theories and completely outrageous claims.

LOL, you're funny when wrong.
Logged
Colin
ColinW
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,684
Papua New Guinea


Political Matrix
E: 3.87, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: March 22, 2007, 11:25:16 AM »

Nice attack Colin. Throwing the word "fascist" around about a conservative is not unexpected around here and especially not from a liberal such as yourself.

I'm sorry but most John Birchers cross the line from conservatism into authoritarianism in my book with the John Birch Societies latent anti-Semitism, conspiracy theories and completely outrageous claims.

LOL, you're funny when wrong.

Last time I checked the John Birchers claimed that Eisenhower was a Communist which is catagorically false. Unless I am mistaken, which I don't think I am, this isn't a singular occurance.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: March 22, 2007, 11:33:25 AM »

Nice attack Colin. Throwing the word "fascist" around about a conservative is not unexpected around here and especially not from a liberal such as yourself.

I'm sorry but most John Birchers cross the line from conservatism into authoritarianism in my book with the John Birch Societies latent anti-Semitism, conspiracy theories and completely outrageous claims.

LOL, you're funny when wrong.

Last time I checked the John Birchers claimed that Eisenhower was a Communist which is catagorically false. Unless I am mistaken, which I don't think I am, this isn't a singular occurance.

Lets see links & proof of the accusations you are making.
Logged
Colin
ColinW
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,684
Papua New Guinea


Political Matrix
E: 3.87, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: March 22, 2007, 11:41:02 AM »

Nice attack Colin. Throwing the word "fascist" around about a conservative is not unexpected around here and especially not from a liberal such as yourself.

I'm sorry but most John Birchers cross the line from conservatism into authoritarianism in my book with the John Birch Societies latent anti-Semitism, conspiracy theories and completely outrageous claims.

LOL, you're funny when wrong.

Last time I checked the John Birchers claimed that Eisenhower was a Communist which is catagorically false. Unless I am mistaken, which I don't think I am, this isn't a singular occurance.

Lets see links & proof of the accusations you are making.

The Wikipedia article on the John Birch Society which links to websites showing quotations from The Politician which was John Birch founder Robert Welch's book.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Birch_Society

The page contains two links to websites stating quoting these attacks.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,779


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: March 22, 2007, 11:44:22 AM »

Everyone knows the John Birch Society was a bunch of complete freaks. Otherwise, Lewis, Colin and Al all make good points about this.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: March 22, 2007, 12:16:19 PM »

Everyone knows the John Birch Society was a bunch of complete freaks. Otherwise, Lewis, Colin and Al all make good points about this.

"Everyone knows" is opinion, to say the least. I have read their website, gotten their membership package and read their line of beliefs. It is no more "nutty" then any other group out there. The only reason people like you and Colin call them names and go after them is because you two aren't conservatives.
Logged
Bono
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,699
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: March 22, 2007, 12:20:40 PM »

Also, anti-semitism is a neo-con codeword for "anyone who doesn't support every action of the state of Israel".
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.05 seconds with 11 queries.