Target caves to right-wing terrorism, removes Pride merchandise for employee safety

[🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸]

The department said just after 3:15 p.m. that the township store had resumed operations after police officers, with the help of a bomb-sniffing dog from the Stark County Sheriff's office, searched the location and found no bombs.

In a statement, police said its dispatch center around 12:40 p.m. received calls from Channel 19 and Channel 5 news saying they had received bomb threats against four Target stores, including the one in Jackson Township. The message said that Target had turned its back on the LGBTQ community and that bombs had been planted in the stores.

https://www.cantonrep.com/story/news/local/jackson/2023/05/26/target-store-jackson-township-evacuated-bomb-threat-pride-month-terrorist-threats-lgbtq-merch/70261866007/

I wonder how many of the bomb threats are just false flags in order to make the other side look bad.

[🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸]

I wonder how many of the bomb threats are just false flags in order to make the other side look bad.

Probably some of them are. The type of person who thinks bomb threats are OK isn't likely to have a moral objection to some lying.

Very true since in vast majority of cases they are lying in the first place about there being a bomb.

[🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸]

I wonder how many of the bomb threats are just false flags in order to make the other side look bad.

Jesus freaking Christ you can’t be serious with that nut job conspiracy

“Oh sh*t what we’ve intended to happen all along is making us look bad, better call it a false flag!”

Something that requires zero coordination between different individuals is not a "conspiracy."

Whose side do you think looks bad if this threat is taken at face value?

https://www.tmz.com/2023/05/27/target-bomb-threat-lgbtq-ally-ohio-utah-pride-hoax/

[🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸]

But I think there is an agenda to make children trans, who aren't trans.

You are incorrect about this. Do not believe lies from the likes of Matt Walsh, Ron DeSantis, Chiya Raichik, and the like.

Why should we believe that they're lies?

I know this will be lost on you, but you’re making the assertion that certain groups are forcibly transing kids gender. You should be the one providing credible evidence that it’s true

If what you're saying is true, wouldn't you be able to back it up?  Wouldn't you be able to give me a knowable answer as to why more people are declaring as "trans" now than ever before?  You tell me why the incidence of Gender Dysphoria is higher than it has ever been?

I think it's the case both that kids are becoming trans as a result of sociocultural influence, and also that this mostly isn't because anyone is intentionally setting out to make this happen. Representations of transness are put out in the culture for the sake of being inclusive, which are then adopted as a self-understanding by kids who may be struggling with their social and bodily experience for a variety of reasons.

[🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸]

But I think there is an agenda to make children trans, who aren't trans.

You are incorrect about this. Do not believe lies from the likes of Matt Walsh, Ron DeSantis, Chiya Raichik, and the like.

Why should we believe that they're lies?

I know this will be lost on you, but you’re making the assertion that certain groups are forcibly transing kids gender. You should be the one providing credible evidence that it’s true

If what you're saying is true, wouldn't you be able to back it up?  Wouldn't you be able to give me a knowable answer as to why more people are declaring as "trans" now than ever before?  You tell me why the incidence of Gender Dysphoria is higher than it has ever been?

I think it's the case both that kids are becoming trans as a result of sociocultural influence,

What actual evidence do you have for this? Because the only "evidence" for sociocultural influence inducing transness when it wasn't there before(as opposed to it allowing more people to recognize it due to increased understanding/decreased stigma) was a terribly done study that's methodology IIRC was basically just asking parents, most of whom were recruited from explicitly anti-trans forums, if they thought their kids were trans because of peer influence, and trusting that extremely biased source as gospel.

And as someone who actually has experienced gender dysphoria and s**t, social contagion and cultural influence theories are contradicted by personal experience, while transness becoming more common for reason analagous to those that made left handedness more common a century ago(increased knowledge of it plus decreased stigma leading to people being more likely to A. know what they're feeling and have language that expresses it, B. actually accept that their feelings are valid, and C. know that transition is a thing that can be done). There was some backround like of the idea of being and presenting female for most of my life, but I didn't know what being trans was until I was 9 or 10 at least, and back then it was described to me by my parents in a way that, while well meaning and not hateful, did end up setting trans people up as some kind of exotic weird people separate from the "default" I (as a white kid who was supposedly "straight" and "male") was taught on a subconscious level by my environment, media and otherwise, that I was. It took a while for me to entertain the idea that I might be trans, and I ended up thinking I wasn't because of some stupid bulls**t test that wasn't and isn't worth a thimble full of piss told me I wasn't(the fact that I gave the answer with the weird maid fetishy stuff to the "do you like cleaning" question because cleaning was kind of satisfying and the other answers all implied not liking it and also I didn't know what a fetish was), and suggested "autogynephillia", a diagnosis of sexual arousal from feeling like a hot women that is ostensibly a male fetish. Of course, the fact that many if not most cis women fit the diagnostic criteria for this "male" "fetish" calls at the very least the first part of that description into question. From my understanding, finding yourself enjoying the thought of being the opposite sex more than being your current sex during "private moments" tends to be a sign that you'd like being the opposite sex more in general.

It’s pretty clear to me that the experience of gender is to a significant degree social and cultural. If the concept of gender and how it relates to sex changes in a culture, why wouldn’t I expect that change how people identify what gender they are?  The act of labeling an experience has a tendency to modify that experience toward the pattern of the label. 

Not just the number but also the demographic profile of who is trans has changed over time. It used to be most were adult MtF, but now a large proportion are adolescent FtM.  This suggests that the things that lead someone to identify as trans today are likely different than in the past.

Regarding left-handedness, the concept of being left-handed isn’t new. And stigma by itself is probably not a good explanation for lower rates a century ago. The historical data on it isn’t great, but it seems that low rates of left-handedness were associated with the industrial revolution and universal education, where kids ended up learning to be right-handed because their physical environments were set up for that, and most adapted to it. Before that, left-handedness might have been about as common as today.

[🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸]

Target having "tuck friendly" swimwear is part of that agenda. It wants to present being trans as both cool and a choice for all children. Its the same logic as "children under five can't possible know rather they are a boy or girl so both should be presented as options"

Not sure why everyone keeps accepting this claim about "tuck friendly swimwear for children" uncritically when it's demonstrably false.

Are there a lot of adult males who would fit in an XS women's swimsuit?

[🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸]

It’s pretty clear to me that the experience of gender is to a significant degree social and cultural. If the concept of gender and how it relates to sex changes in a culture, why wouldn’t I expect that change how people identify what gender they are?  The act of labeling an experience has a tendency to modify that experience toward the pattern of the label. 

Not just the number but also the demographic profile of who is trans has changed over time. It used to be most were adult MtF, but now a large proportion are adolescent FtM.  This suggests that the things that lead someone to identify as trans today are likely different than in the past.

Regarding left-handedness, the concept of being left-handed isn’t new. And stigma by itself is probably not a good explanation for lower rates a century ago. The historical data on it isn’t great, but it seems that low rates of left-handedness were associated with the industrial revolution and universal education, where kids ended up learning to be right-handed because their physical environments were set up for that, and most adapted to it. Before that, left-handedness might have been about as common as today.

Gender has significant cultural/social elements, but at its core gender is a core part of the human psyche. You need more evidence to imply that transness is some cultural fad than saying that the demographics of the trans community have changed as transness became less dangerous and unknown. The things that leads trans people to identify as trans and transition are gender dysphoria and gender euphoria. The fact that its actually properly understood now is what causes the increase and more equal gender distribution(and the fact that trans men were generally able to present as masculine women without becoming a pariah, while for trans women, presenting oneself as a feminine man meant becoming an outcast.

I am not sure about the idea that trans woman have had an easier time fitting in to society in the past than trans men. I don't know but it's not what I would guess.

It isn't so much a more equal gender distribution now from what is was before, as it is reversed.


https://www.genderhq.org/increase-trans-females-nonbinary-dysphoria

[🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸]

It’s pretty clear to me that the experience of gender is to a significant degree social and cultural. If the concept of gender and how it relates to sex changes in a culture, why wouldn’t I expect that change how people identify what gender they are?  The act of labeling an experience has a tendency to modify that experience toward the pattern of the label. 

Not just the number but also the demographic profile of who is trans has changed over time. It used to be most were adult MtF, but now a large proportion are adolescent FtM.  This suggests that the things that lead someone to identify as trans today are likely different than in the past.

Regarding left-handedness, the concept of being left-handed isn’t new. And stigma by itself is probably not a good explanation for lower rates a century ago. The historical data on it isn’t great, but it seems that low rates of left-handedness were associated with the industrial revolution and universal education, where kids ended up learning to be right-handed because their physical environments were set up for that, and most adapted to it. Before that, left-handedness might have been about as common as today.

Gender has significant cultural/social elements, but at its core gender is a core part of the human psyche. You need more evidence to imply that transness is some cultural fad than saying that the demographics of the trans community have changed as transness became less dangerous and unknown. The things that leads trans people to identify as trans and transition are gender dysphoria and gender euphoria. The fact that its actually properly understood now is what causes the increase and more equal gender distribution(and the fact that trans men were generally able to present as masculine women without becoming a pariah, while for trans women, presenting oneself as a feminine man meant becoming an outcast.

I am not sure about the idea that trans woman have had an easier time fitting in to society in the past than trans men. I don't know but it's not what I would guess.

It isn't so much a more equal gender distribution now from what is was before, as it is reversed.


https://www.genderhq.org/increase-trans-females-nonbinary-dysphoria

I was saying that trans women didn't have the option to present as a gender nonconforming member of our birth sex with relatively bearable backlash in the same way that trans men did back them. Also the trans women who transitioned back then generally had a lot of resources that afab people were much less likely to have than amab people.

And the site your citing has a very clear agenda that puts its statistics in doubt. And especially when they scaremonger about autistic kids being somehow suckered into transitioning as if people like me are idiots who can't be trusted to understand our own bodies.

The 1st graph figures are from the 2018 UK National LGBT Survey and show self-ID.

The 2nd graph figures are from Tavistock https://gids.nhs.uk/about-us/number-of-referrals/