Is this worrisome for Democrats?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 04:28:29 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Is this worrisome for Democrats?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Is this worrisome for Democrats?  (Read 593 times)
WalterWhite
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,990
United States
Political Matrix
E: -9.35, S: -9.83

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: April 23, 2023, 07:43:54 PM »

In recent history, Democrats typically improve on their popular vote margin from a midterm election to the subsequent presidential election in the House of Representatives, regardless of whether the incumbent is a Republican or a Democrat.

1994 to 1996: R+6.8% to D+0.1% (D+6.9% improvement)
1998 to 2000: R+1.1% to R+0.5% (D+0.6% improvement)
2002 to 2004: R+4.8% to R+2.6% (D+2.2% improvement)
2006 to 2008: D+8.0% to D+10.6% (D+2.6% improvement)
2010 to 2012: R+6.8% to D+1.2% (D+8.0% improvement)
2014 to 2016: R+5.7% to R+1.1% (D+4.6% improvement)

From 1996 to 2016, Democrats do, on average, 4.2% better in House elections during a presidential year than the House election two years prior.

Given that the 2018 House popular vote margin was D+8.6%, one might have expected the 2020 House popular vote margin to be D+12.8% based on previous data. However, the actual 2020 House popular vote margin was D+3.1%, which is 9.7% more Republican than what recent trends indicate. 2020 was the first presidential year since 1992 in which Republicans improved their popular vote margins in the House of Representatives from the last midterm election.

What is this supposed to mean? Was this just a fluke, or is this really troublesome for Democrats?
Logged
Fuzzy Bear
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,726
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: April 24, 2023, 06:16:38 AM »

In recent history, Democrats typically improve on their popular vote margin from a midterm election to the subsequent presidential election in the House of Representatives, regardless of whether the incumbent is a Republican or a Democrat.

1994 to 1996: R+6.8% to D+0.1% (D+6.9% improvement)
1998 to 2000: R+1.1% to R+0.5% (D+0.6% improvement)
2002 to 2004: R+4.8% to R+2.6% (D+2.2% improvement)
2006 to 2008: D+8.0% to D+10.6% (D+2.6% improvement)
2010 to 2012: R+6.8% to D+1.2% (D+8.0% improvement)
2014 to 2016: R+5.7% to R+1.1% (D+4.6% improvement)

From 1996 to 2016, Democrats do, on average, 4.2% better in House elections during a presidential year than the House election two years prior.

Given that the 2018 House popular vote margin was D+8.6%, one might have expected the 2020 House popular vote margin to be D+12.8% based on previous data. However, the actual 2020 House popular vote margin was D+3.1%, which is 9.7% more Republican than what recent trends indicate. 2020 was the first presidential year since 1992 in which Republicans improved their popular vote margins in the House of Representatives from the last midterm election.

What is this supposed to mean? Was this just a fluke, or is this really troublesome for Democrats?

The Democrats, as a whole, have taken uniformily Far-Left positions on a wide range of social issues.  They are far more socially liberal than the entirety of their party.  Younger voters are more in line with the Democrats, to be sure, but younger voters don't always enter the electorate at the same rate as older voters depart the electorate due to death or change of partisan leanings in its older voters.
Logged
ottermax
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,799
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.58, S: -6.09

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: April 24, 2023, 09:29:38 AM »

That historic trend was caused by the turnout differential between Democrats and Republicans where Democrats were the party of lower propensity voters (generally lower income, less college-educated, more racially diverse). 2020 was a big shift and this is great evidence for that. Trump created a new group of low propensity voters who turned out for him.

Interestingly this is probably why the Democrats overperformed in 2022 - Republicans now rely on low-propensity voters in a way that Democrats did for the past 20-30 years, and they do not show up in non-presidential years. Bizarrely most Democratic pundits just expect 2024 to be good for them and 2020 showed us that presidential turnout is not necessarily good for Democrats anymore. If Trump loses the nomination however it will be interesting to see what actually happens.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 11 queries.