Why did many Southern states once ban incumbent governors from serving back to back terms?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 03:59:19 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Why did many Southern states once ban incumbent governors from serving back to back terms?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why did many Southern states once ban incumbent governors from serving back to back terms?  (Read 325 times)
Greedo punched first
ERM64man
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,795


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: April 23, 2023, 02:42:14 PM »

Virginia is currently the only state like this. Alabama and Mississippi use to be like that. What was the reason for this?
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,662
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: April 23, 2023, 03:01:33 PM »

Extreme fear of executive power during the early republic era.   Almost of the states with simple majority veto overrides (AR, AL, IN, KY, TN, WV) are also Southern or heavily Southern influenced, and NC, MD, and DE have a 60% override threshold instead of the standard 2/3rds.  NC only introduced the gubernatorial veto at all in the 1990's. 
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 11 queries.