Describe Mondale-Dole voter.

[TimeUnit2027]

Let's try

[Mr. Smith]

George Wallace, possibly John Anderson.

[TheElectoralBoobyPrize]

They’d almost assuredly be a southerner.

[I Will Not Be Wrong]

Somebody from Western Pennsylvania.

[TheReckoning]

Certainly some in Russell County, Kansas

[John Forbes Kerrygold 🧈]

Centrist to center-left Independent, probably southern, possibly a veteran. "Voted for the person not the party." Was troubled by Clinton's personal foibles and respected Dole's experience. Probably a Mondale-Bush and Gore-Bush voter later as well.

[Vice President Christian Man]

Are there any counties that voted accordingly?

[Brother Jonathan]

Are there any counties that voted accordingly?

Edgefield, South Carolina and Lincoln, Tennessee at the very least it seems. But that can probably be attributed to Perot.

[darklordoftech]

Disliked that Reagan broke his pledge to deactivate Selective Service and pushed the war on drugs but also disliked Clinton’s “soccer momism”.

[seskoog]

I'm curious if there were any Mondale-Bush 92 voters. I don't believe any counties voted that way.

[TheElectoralBoobyPrize]

.

Are there any counties that voted accordingly?

Edgefield, South Carolina and Lincoln, Tennessee at the very least it seems. But that can probably be attributed to Perot.

Or ancestral Democrats dying off. Or maybe there were some that gave the benefit of the doubt to Mondale because he had been Carter's VP, but were too far gone to the Rs by '96.

I'm curious if there were any Mondale-Bush 92 voters. I don't believe any counties voted that way.

I thought for sure there would be an Iowa county that voted this way, but nope.

[mianfei]

Are there any counties that voted accordingly?

Edgefield, South Carolina and Lincoln, Tennessee at the very least it seems. But that can probably be attributed to Perot.
[/quote]

Or ancestral Democrats dying off. Or maybe there were some that gave the benefit of the doubt to Mondale because he had been Carter's VP, but were too far gone to the Rs by '96.
[/quote]Certainly nothing to do with Perot. It was substantially ancestral Democrats disappearing with the Republican Revolution of 1994. Although the rapid shift of ancestral Democrats really took off in 2000, there were traces of it in 1996, when Clinton lost many of these counties in Kentucky. Despite unusually good performances for a Democrat in the old Unionist GOP bastions — getting 37 percent in Owsley County, 52 percent in Tyler County, West Virginia and carrying Martin County — Clinton only won Kentucky by less than one percent. Other states of the nonplantation South — Arkansas, Missouri, Tennessee and West Virginia — showed similar if less marked trends following on from the Republican Revolution.