1964: Johnson doesn't run
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 07:54:47 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  1964: Johnson doesn't run
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 1964: Johnson doesn't run  (Read 702 times)
President Johnson
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,896
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.70


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: March 09, 2023, 03:09:16 PM »

LBJ actually considered briefly not running in the summer of 1964. What if he actually announced not to seek a full term? Does Bobby already get the nomination or is he more likely to end up in second place with Hubert Humphrey on top of the ticket?
Logged
Agonized-Statism
Anarcho-Statism
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,816


Political Matrix
E: -9.10, S: -5.83

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: March 09, 2023, 04:35:49 PM »

Kennedy would have a much better shot at the nomination than he did in 1968 with his brother's assassination on everyone's minds and early '60s optimism still in full swing. I suspect he goes for it, losing a bit of ground especially in the South but still winning big. Humphrey's map would look about the same, losing a bit of Johnson and to a lesser extent RFK's rally round the flag effect.


Attorney General Robert Kennedy (D-MA) / Governor Terry Sanford (D-NC)
Senator Barry Goldwater (R-AZ) / Congressman William Miller (R-NY) ✔
Logged
Sir Mohamed
MohamedChalid
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,702
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: March 11, 2023, 11:26:33 AM »

Kennedy would have a much better shot at the nomination than he did in 1968 with his brother's assassination on everyone's minds and early '60s optimism still in full swing. I suspect he goes for it, losing a bit of ground especially in the South but still winning big. Humphrey's map would look about the same, losing a bit of Johnson and to a lesser extent RFK's rally round the flag effect.


Attorney General Robert Kennedy (D-MA) / Governor Terry Sanford (D-NC)
Senator Barry Goldwater (R-AZ) / Congressman William Miller (R-NY) ✔

Yup, that sounds pretty good.

I read about Johnson considering not running as well, but is that really true? He was one of the most power hungry and politically skilled leaders of this country, I can't believe he would have given up being prez after 14 months and while a landslide reelection was pretty much assured. If he was more popular and in better health, he would have gone for another term in 1968.
Logged
Fuzzy Bear
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,721
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: April 08, 2023, 10:09:47 PM »
« Edited: April 08, 2023, 10:14:26 PM by Fuzzy Bear »

If RFK was going to be the candidate, Richard Nixon would have been nominated.


RFK's task would be to hold some combination of the Southern states, particularly the Carolinas and Georgia and be competitive in Louisiana and Texas.  Nixon had lots of friends in the petroleum industry, and I think that would have made a BIG difference.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 13 queries.