Daily Kos: Republicans now openly advocating mass murder of LGBTQ+ Americans

[Landslide Lyndon]

This is all an aside to the fact that the scenario you outlined here was completely ridiculous. How exactly are Republicans going to "forcibly de-transition" someone who lives in San Francisco? You are stark raving insane if you think this is remotely plausible. This is why I do not take you seriously on this subject: You use the most hyperbolic rhetoric you can think of because you get emotional, and then you find yourself defending an indefensible position. Why should I spend time formulating responses to arguments that you barely put any thought into in the first place?

Are you unfamiliar with the concept of federal laws? What exactly would stop a GOP trifecta from passing a law banning gender-affirming care at the national level?

The Constitution would stop it from happening because it is an issue that is up for the states to decide. The regulation of health and welfare falls under the police powers reserved to the states.

Wow, the naivete! Or should I say delusion.

[Kahane's Grave Is A Gender-Neutral Bathroom]

This is all an aside to the fact that the scenario you outlined here was completely ridiculous. How exactly are Republicans going to "forcibly de-transition" someone who lives in San Francisco? You are stark raving insane if you think this is remotely plausible. This is why I do not take you seriously on this subject: You use the most hyperbolic rhetoric you can think of because you get emotional, and then you find yourself defending an indefensible position. Why should I spend time formulating responses to arguments that you barely put any thought into in the first place?

Are you unfamiliar with the concept of federal laws? What exactly would stop a GOP trifecta from passing a law banning gender-affirming care at the national level?

The Constitution would stop it from happening because it is an issue that is up for the states to decide. The regulation of health and welfare falls under the police powers reserved to the states.

Wow, the naivete! Or should I say delusion.

Even in the worst possible scenario SF would be safe for LGBT people. If you take the Fugitive Slave Act (which is a good example as trans activists see themselves as fighting something as evil and important as slavery) the agents and hired people searching for escaped slaves didn't just break down doors in rural Vermont, for instance.

[Ferguson97]

This is all an aside to the fact that the scenario you outlined here was completely ridiculous. How exactly are Republicans going to "forcibly de-transition" someone who lives in San Francisco? You are stark raving insane if you think this is remotely plausible. This is why I do not take you seriously on this subject: You use the most hyperbolic rhetoric you can think of because you get emotional, and then you find yourself defending an indefensible position. Why should I spend time formulating responses to arguments that you barely put any thought into in the first place?

Are you unfamiliar with the concept of federal laws? What exactly would stop a GOP trifecta from passing a law banning gender-affirming care at the national level?

The Constitution would stop it from happening because it is an issue that is up for the states to decide. The regulation of health and welfare falls under the police powers reserved to the states.

Tell that to the 6-3 conservative US Supreme Court.

[Kahane's Grave Is A Gender-Neutral Bathroom]

This is all an aside to the fact that the scenario you outlined here was completely ridiculous. How exactly are Republicans going to "forcibly de-transition" someone who lives in San Francisco? You are stark raving insane if you think this is remotely plausible. This is why I do not take you seriously on this subject: You use the most hyperbolic rhetoric you can think of because you get emotional, and then you find yourself defending an indefensible position. Why should I spend time formulating responses to arguments that you barely put any thought into in the first place?

Are you unfamiliar with the concept of federal laws? What exactly would stop a GOP trifecta from passing a law banning gender-affirming care at the national level?

The Constitution would stop it from happening because it is an issue that is up for the states to decide. The regulation of health and welfare falls under the police powers reserved to the states.

Tell that to the 6-3 conservative US Supreme Court.

ACLU LLC et al. v. ER, DIRECTOR, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, et al.

Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

No. 17–599. Argued April 22, 2024—Decided June 25, 2024

The opinion of the court is written by Justice Ben Laden and joined by Justice Thomas, Justice Rowling, Justice Kavanaugh, and Justice Coney Barrett and is as follows:

"lmao kill the transgenders lol"

[President of the great nation of 🏳️‍⚧️]

ACLU LLC et al. v. STATE OF ALABAMA, et al.

Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

No. 17–599. Argued April 1, 2031—Decided June 27, 2031

The opinion of the court is written by Justice Raichik and joined by Justice Thomas, Justice Kavanaugh, Justice Barrett, Justice Bishop, and Justice Walsh and is as follows:

"lmao kill the transgenders lol"

You joke, but I fixed it for you.

[Kahane's Grave Is A Gender-Neutral Bathroom]

ACLU LLC et al. v. STATE OF ALABAMA, et al.

Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

No. 17–599. Argued April 1, 2031—Decided June 27, 2031

The opinion of the court is written by Justice Raichik and joined by Justice Thomas, Justice Kavanaugh, Justice Barrett, Justice Bishop, and Justice Walsh and is as follows:

"lmao kill the transgenders lol"

You joke, but I fixed it for you.

Raichik, Bishop and Walsh are appointed by President DeSantis, who OSR continues to insist is moderate.