MO: 1996 Referendum General Election Result
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 11:32:37 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  MO: 1996 Referendum General Election Result
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MO: 1996 Referendum General Election Result  (Read 786 times)
RBH
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,210


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 17, 2007, 08:27:45 PM »

New Election: 1996 Missouri Referendum General Election Results
   
   

Amendment 9: "Shall Article VIII of the Missouri Constitution be amended to provide that Missourians intend this initiative lead to adoption of an amendment to the United States Constitution establishing Congressional term limits and further amend Article VIII to provide the Secretary of State shall determine and inform voters on election ballots whether candidates for Congress support Congressional term limits by printing adjacent to incumbent candidates who failed to support Congressional term limits "DISREGARDED VOTERS' INSTRUCTION ON TERM LIMITS" and printing adjacent to non-incumbent candidates who refuse to take a term limits pledge "DECLINED TO PLEDGE TO SUPPORT TERM LIMITS?""



And this was struck down as unconstitutional.
Logged
RBH
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,210


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 17, 2007, 08:40:59 PM »

Term Limits in Nebraska



Passed 56-44
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 18, 2007, 02:09:19 AM »

What is with these attempts to inform voters on the ballot which politicians didn't support term limits?  I know this also was tried in Montana, too.
Logged
jimrtex
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,817
Marshall Islands


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 24, 2007, 04:06:39 AM »

What is with these attempts to inform voters on the ballot which politicians didn't support term limits?  I know this also was tried in Montana, too.
State-imposed term limits on federal representatives and senators violate the US Constitution.  The ballot labelling laws were an attempt to circumvent this limitation.  The states argued that this was no different than provisions in state law that permitted a candidate for Congress to be designated by political party on the ballot (eg it was only information).  But since there wasn't other information included on the ballot, and the clear intent was to get around the constitutional limitation, it has been ruled that it was equivalent to imposing a qualification.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 11 queries.