Why did Herschel a Walker hold up better than Oz or Masters? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 06:55:01 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Why did Herschel a Walker hold up better than Oz or Masters? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why did Herschel a Walker hold up better than Oz or Masters?  (Read 759 times)
Spectator
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,383
United States


« on: December 02, 2022, 08:52:54 AM »

I think Herschel's status as a football legend actually did earn him a lot of goodwill. A hypothetical candidate who had all of his baggage but without the football accomplishments wouldn't have made it out of primary even with a Trump endorsement.

This holds up in the general election. As obviously flawed as Herschel Walker is, he was still a football star in his small hometown and the state's flagship university. Naturally, someone like that will have much more goodwill than a creepy tech bro or a snake-oil peddler who ran for office in a state that he didn't even live in.

I actually think his status as a legend had minimal impact. That was all 40 years ago, and anyone under the age of 50 wouldn’t remember it. He seems to have gotten a small bump out of his home county of Johnson, only underperforming Kemp by 1%, but that’s about all I see.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 13 queries.