2024 Generic Ballot / Recruitment / Fundraising / Ratings Megathread
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 05:56:39 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  2024 Generic Ballot / Recruitment / Fundraising / Ratings Megathread
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 25 26 27 28 29 [30] 31 32
Author Topic: 2024 Generic Ballot / Recruitment / Fundraising / Ratings Megathread  (Read 42947 times)
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,341
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #725 on: March 11, 2024, 06:09:01 AM »



I don’t know how much that helps in a district he lost to Nikki Haley
A good deal. Mace's 2022 primary challenger was Trumpy; I think she was even Trumpy enough, although I don't recall if she won the endorsement.

Mace won her 2022 primary…
Logged
Tekken_Guy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,985
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #726 on: March 11, 2024, 11:38:38 AM »



I don’t know how much that helps in a district he lost to Nikki Haley
A good deal. Mace's 2022 primary challenger was Trumpy; I think she was even Trumpy enough, although I don't recall if she won the endorsement.

Mace won her 2022 primary…

Well she was the incumbent and she’ll be the incumbent here as well.
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,341
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #727 on: March 11, 2024, 12:16:37 PM »



I don’t know how much that helps in a district he lost to Nikki Haley
A good deal. Mace's 2022 primary challenger was Trumpy; I think she was even Trumpy enough, although I don't recall if she won the endorsement.

Mace won her 2022 primary…

Well she was the incumbent and she’ll be the incumbent here as well.

She’s a much weaker and much Trumpier incumbent than she was then.  I think the question is less if she wins or loses, it’s which of her challengers wins the race to beat her in the runoff.
Logged
Tekken_Guy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,985
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #728 on: March 11, 2024, 12:27:56 PM »



I don’t know how much that helps in a district he lost to Nikki Haley
A good deal. Mace's 2022 primary challenger was Trumpy; I think she was even Trumpy enough, although I don't recall if she won the endorsement.

Mace won her 2022 primary…

Well she was the incumbent and she’ll be the incumbent here as well.

She’s a much weaker and much Trumpier incumbent than she was then.  I think the question is less if she wins or loses, it’s which of her challengers wins the race to beat her in the runoff.

Well Haley only won SC-01 because of a lot of Democrats crossing over to vote against Trump. Mace won’t have that sort of problem to the same extent. She could still lose but I won’t count her out.
Logged
Roll Roons
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,052
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #729 on: March 11, 2024, 03:12:24 PM »
« Edited: March 11, 2024, 03:30:29 PM by Roll Roons »

SMP reserving $239M in ads across seven Senate battlegrounds:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/03/11/senate-democrats-ads-super-pac/

$65M in OH
$42M in PA
$23M in AZ
$14M each in MI and WI

In addition to a previously announced $45M in MT and $36M in NV, and the possibility of offensive spending in FL and TX.
Logged
Tekken_Guy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,985
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #730 on: March 11, 2024, 03:29:49 PM »

SLF reserving $239M in ads across seven Senate battlegrounds:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/03/11/senate-democrats-ads-super-pac/

$65M in OH
$42M in PA
$23M in AZ
$14M each in MI and WI

In addition to a previously announced $45M in MT and $36M in NV, and the possibility of offensive spending in FL and TX.

SLF is the Republicans.
Logged
Roll Roons
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,052
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #731 on: March 11, 2024, 03:30:36 PM »

SLF reserving $239M in ads across seven Senate battlegrounds:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/03/11/senate-democrats-ads-super-pac/

$65M in OH
$42M in PA
$23M in AZ
$14M each in MI and WI

In addition to a previously announced $45M in MT and $36M in NV, and the possibility of offensive spending in FL and TX.

SLF is the Republicans.

Thank you, fixed.
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,229


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #732 on: March 13, 2024, 11:50:53 AM »

Dems take the lead again, ever so slightly

Logged
Spectator
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,383
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #733 on: March 13, 2024, 04:43:43 PM »

SMP reserving $239M in ads across seven Senate battlegrounds:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/03/11/senate-democrats-ads-super-pac/

$65M in OH
$42M in PA
$23M in AZ
$14M each in MI and WI

In addition to a previously announced $45M in MT and $36M in NV, and the possibility of offensive spending in FL and TX.

The low figure in Michigan is kind of perplexing. Arizona’s and Wisconsin’s similar comparatively low figures probably indicates they think Gallego and Baldwin are a decent favorite but want to make sure.
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,229


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #734 on: March 18, 2024, 04:35:53 PM »

Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,229


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #735 on: March 22, 2024, 09:30:20 AM »

CA-09 and CA-49 being Lean D at this point is kind of absurd

Logged
Roll Roons
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,052
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #736 on: March 22, 2024, 09:39:50 AM »
« Edited: March 22, 2024, 09:58:10 AM by Roll Roons »

CA-09 and CA-49 being Lean D at this point is kind of absurd



To use your words, are you dense?

The article literally explains why they've made the decisions that they have. You're just salty because all of the ratings changes favor Republicans.
Logged
kwabbit
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,812


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #737 on: March 22, 2024, 09:55:24 AM »

CA-09 and CA-49 being Lean D at this point is kind of absurd



CA-09 had more GOP votes in the primary and the GOP actually has a good candidate. Mayor of the largest city in the district. Lean D seems appropriate, although Likely still makes sense.

CA-49 I'd keep as Likely, but Levin didn't dominate the primary. GOP doesn't have the candidate to flip it though.
Logged
Gracile
gracile
Moderator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,064


Political Matrix
E: -8.00, S: -7.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #738 on: March 22, 2024, 10:09:53 AM »

Cook made some rating changes yesterday, two in favor of Republicans and two in favor of Democrats-

https://www.cookpolitical.com/analysis/house/house-overview/house-rating-changes-mn-02-moves-likely-lean-democrat-three-other

FL-05: Likely R > Solid R
MN-02: Likely D > Lean D
NJ-03: Likely D > Solid D
VA-10: Likely D > Solid D
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,371


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #739 on: March 22, 2024, 10:25:47 AM »

Why was FL05 even likely? Any good Democrat running in Jacksonville would obviously run for the 4th seat. Sure the trends on the 5th are decent for dems but its still Trump +15  and its FL.
Logged
Tekken_Guy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,985
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #740 on: March 22, 2024, 10:27:01 AM »

CA-09 and CA-49 being Lean D at this point is kind of absurd



CA-09 had more GOP votes in the primary and the GOP actually has a good candidate. Mayor of the largest city in the district. Lean D seems appropriate, although Likely still makes sense.

CA-49 I'd keep as Likely, but Levin didn't dominate the primary. GOP doesn't have the candidate to flip it though.

Last time I remember Harder was doing fine in the primary.
Logged
kwabbit
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,812


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #741 on: March 22, 2024, 11:06:16 AM »

CA-09 and CA-49 being Lean D at this point is kind of absurd



CA-09 had more GOP votes in the primary and the GOP actually has a good candidate. Mayor of the largest city in the district. Lean D seems appropriate, although Likely still makes sense.

CA-49 I'd keep as Likely, but Levin didn't dominate the primary. GOP doesn't have the candidate to flip it though.

Last time I remember Harder was doing fine in the primary.

Late returns pushed him from 52 to under 50.
Logged
Tekken_Guy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,985
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #742 on: March 22, 2024, 11:10:42 AM »

CA-09 and CA-49 being Lean D at this point is kind of absurd



CA-09 had more GOP votes in the primary and the GOP actually has a good candidate. Mayor of the largest city in the district. Lean D seems appropriate, although Likely still makes sense.

CA-49 I'd keep as Likely, but Levin didn't dominate the primary. GOP doesn't have the candidate to flip it though.

Last time I remember Harder was doing fine in the primary.

Late returns pushed him from 52 to under 50.

Come to think of it, Harder was barely above 50 in the 2022 primary and he easily won in November. I don’t think he has much to worry about and Kevin Lincoln is Allan Fung 2.0 at best.
Logged
kwabbit
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,812


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #743 on: March 22, 2024, 11:28:24 AM »

CA-09 and CA-49 being Lean D at this point is kind of absurd



CA-09 had more GOP votes in the primary and the GOP actually has a good candidate. Mayor of the largest city in the district. Lean D seems appropriate, although Likely still makes sense.

CA-49 I'd keep as Likely, but Levin didn't dominate the primary. GOP doesn't have the candidate to flip it though.

Last time I remember Harder was doing fine in the primary.

Late returns pushed him from 52 to under 50.

Come to think of it, Harder was barely above 50 in the 2022 primary and he easily won in November. I don’t think he has much to worry about and Kevin Lincoln is Allan Fung 2.0 at best.

Yeah, that's the best point in favor of Harder being fine. However, he was a carpetbagger in the 2022 primary and now has actually repped it, so reason to believe the primary is more correlated with the general now.

I don't think Lincoln is as strong as Fung, but the districts are extremely different. If the district wasn't below 20% college educated and heavily Hispanic, it wouldn't really be a question.
Logged
Dr Oz Lost Party!
PittsburghSteel
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,001
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #744 on: March 27, 2024, 11:12:28 AM »
« Edited: March 27, 2024, 11:17:44 AM by Dr Oz Lost Party! »

Dems +2 in latest YouGov poll that shows Trump up 1.

Up 24 points with 18-29 year olds and 23 with Hispanics. Fun!

Dem party favorability stands at 36-56% (-20), GOP at 33-60% (-27). Last week's YouGov also showed the GOP's unfavorability cracking 60%.

Moderate voters give the GOP a -49 favorability rating, and the Dems a -12.

https://d3nkl3psvxxpe9.cloudfront.net/documents/econTabReport_mTlzQOB.pdf
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,229


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #745 on: March 27, 2024, 01:54:04 PM »

YouGov/Economist poll inches 538 average back to Democrats:

Democrats 44.5%
Republicans 44.3%

D+0.2
Logged
brucejoel99
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,729
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #746 on: March 27, 2024, 05:02:36 PM »

2026/28 recruitment thread material:

Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,743


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #747 on: March 27, 2024, 05:10:36 PM »

2026/28 recruitment thread material:


It's not like you have to "move" to run in a different congressional district in the same state.
Logged
Roll Roons
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,052
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #748 on: March 28, 2024, 07:14:38 AM »


When was the last time an incumbent Democrat lost a primary from the center?
Logged
brucejoel99
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,729
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #749 on: March 28, 2024, 07:42:29 AM »

When was the last time an incumbent Democrat lost a primary from the center?

Al Lawson beating Corrine Brown & Dwight Evans beating Chaka Fattah in 2016?
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 25 26 27 28 29 [30] 31 32  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.051 seconds with 9 queries.