2008: Clinton/Richardson (D) vs. McCain/Owens (R) vs. Independents (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 09:28:31 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Alternative Elections (Moderator: Dereich)
  2008: Clinton/Richardson (D) vs. McCain/Owens (R) vs. Independents (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 2008: Clinton/Richardson (D) vs. McCain/Owens (R) vs. Independents  (Read 1866 times)
CultureKing
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,249
United States


« on: February 03, 2007, 10:31:23 PM »

This is my first time posting a map, so... (somthing just might go wrong):






In this scenario:
McCain/Owens (blue) 147    23% of National vote
Clinton/Richardson (red) 229    29% of National vote
Guiliani/Nelson (light red) 102    22% of National vote
Bloomberg/Ventura 0      4% of National vote
Hagel/Paul (light blue) 61    19% of National vote
Nader/LaMarche 0    3% of National vote

Out of the independents Nader of course is the weakest while Bloomberg runs a campaign that fails to gain much traction and he only gets around 3-4% nationally, McCain is able to win many Republican states and the south though Hagel takes many of the plains states, and Guiliani takes some of the midwest and pulls in Florida. Clinton is able to keep many red states and expand into Arkansas and Louisiana because of the spitting of the votes.
Logged
CultureKing
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,249
United States


« Reply #1 on: February 03, 2007, 10:32:25 PM »

This is my first time posting a map, so... (somthing just might go wrong):






In this scenario:
McCain/Owens (blue) 147    23% of National vote
Clinton/Richardson (red) 229    29% of National vote
Guiliani/Nelson (light red) 102    22% of National vote
Bloomberg/Ventura 0      4% of National vote
Hagel/Paul (light blue) 61    19% of National vote
Nader/LaMarche 0    3% of National vote

Out of the independents Nader of course is the weakest while Bloomberg runs a campaign that fails to gain much traction and he only gets around 3-4% nationally, McCain is able to win many Republican states and the south though Hagel takes many of the plains states, and Guiliani takes some of the midwest and pulls in Florida. Clinton is able to keep many red states and expand into Arkansas and Louisiana because of the spitting of the votes.

oh and the house votes Clinton into office
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 13 queries.