AZ-GOV (Suffolk): Hobbs +1 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 01:21:18 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2022 Gubernatorial Election Polls
  AZ-GOV (Suffolk): Hobbs +1 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: AZ-GOV (Suffolk): Hobbs +1  (Read 863 times)
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,258


« on: September 27, 2022, 07:41:49 AM »

Hobbs (D) 46%
Lake (R) 45%
Undecided 8%

Hobbs fav: 44/32 (+12)
Lake fav: 41/46 (-5)

Was taken 9/21-25, so before much of the news about the new abortion ban.

https://www.suffolk.edu/-/media/suffolk/documents/academics/research-at-suffolk/suprc/polls/other-states/2022/9_27_2022_marginals.pdf?la=en&hash=CCF4EBD1AB374306D62E429263030AD53F974576
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,258


« Reply #1 on: September 27, 2022, 07:49:49 AM »

Hobbs continues to have the best net fav out of all 4 candidates, while Lake has consistently been underwater.

Are Lake's ads attacking Hobbs specifically? While she may be a quieter candidate, people still seem to "like" her (or more, they don't strongly dislike her) like other candidates.
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,258


« Reply #2 on: September 27, 2022, 09:42:51 AM »

I have not seen a single ad from Lake. I have heard the RGA is financing ads attacking Hobbs, but the Senate race has received 90% of people’s attention thus far.

Yeah, sorry i meant RGA ads. Lake is only starting her owns starting today, funny enough.

How are the Hobbs/DGA ads?
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,258


« Reply #3 on: September 27, 2022, 10:08:47 AM »

"Very likely to vote" a bit better for Hobbs, 48-45.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 13 queries.