UK General Discussion: Rishecession
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 12:00:35 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  UK General Discussion: Rishecession
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 55 56 57 58 59 [60] 61 62 63 64 65 ... 230
Author Topic: UK General Discussion: Rishecession  (Read 240983 times)
Torrain
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,056
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1475 on: October 19, 2022, 04:31:29 AM »

https://twitter.com/DPJHodges/status/1582662302553501696?s=20&t=ci1ewASa8g8eW5aMv5nnCQ
Brady is keen for the 1922 Committee not to be seen as a firing squad, hence why he effectively left it to the cabinet to do the dirty work with Johnson in July.

Hodges has a mixed record (see everything he’s written on Beergate), so I’d ideally like a second reporter on this, but this definitely fits with the priors we have. We should remember though, that he told us there would be cabinet resignations within 48 hours - almost a week ago. He’s a bit dodgy. 

Brady’s determination to keep 50% of MPs submitting letters as the trigger for rule-changes and further action has been well-documented, in the Times and elsewhere. And the 15% threshold being met in the past day or two tallies with all the cloak and dagger discussions Brady has had with the cabinet since the weekend.
Logged
Torrain
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,056
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1476 on: October 19, 2022, 04:43:28 AM »

Tory MP no.6 calling for Truss to go - serial critic Steve Double. Comments made on live radio interview, rather than tweets/open letter.
Logged
Torrain
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,056
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1477 on: October 19, 2022, 04:50:40 AM »
« Edited: October 19, 2022, 05:56:46 AM by Torrain »

Government whips have taken the gamble of making today’s fracking vote a three-line whip, no exceptions, framing it as a confidence vote in government.

This is ruffling some feathers, as it forces a number of rural MPs to either lose the whip, or cast a vote that Labour will bludgeon them with until Election Day. It’s a big, antagonistic risk - and could burn through the government’s dwindling reserves of political capital.

The decision has been taken by Truss for procedural reasons, explained in a useful thread here: https://mobile.twitter.com/aliceolilly/status/1582674916314583040
Logged
EastAnglianLefty
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,598


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1478 on: October 19, 2022, 05:40:20 AM »

I note there have previously been calls for part of Truss's reset to involve firing the Chief Whip.

Then again, it's been so long since they had a good one (Williamson was effective but not really good) that I'm not sure who they have who knows how to do the job properly. Given that Brady is known to have leadership ambitions, maybe he'd be their best bet?
Logged
Silent Hunter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,321
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1479 on: October 19, 2022, 05:41:55 AM »

Remember Chamberlain fell after a slashed majority in an adjournment motion treated as a confidence vote.
Logged
Torrain
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,056
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1480 on: October 19, 2022, 05:46:18 AM »

Can anyone think of another example of a three-line whip in favour of a policy explicitly ruled out in the party manifesto?

Feels like we’re entering new territory in the “Truss ignores the 2019 manifesto” saga.
Logged
Property Representative of the Harold Holt Swimming Centre
TheTide
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,657
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1481 on: October 19, 2022, 06:18:14 AM »

She's flip flopped on the triple lock again, thus seemingly overruling Jeremy Hunt. In fact she even name dropped the Chancellor.
Logged
afleitch
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,860


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1482 on: October 19, 2022, 06:56:51 AM »

Worth noting that the recent Scotland poll was commissioned by Alba. Who inserted themselves as a prompted choice.

In terms of flow of the vote from the five recent published polls, rather than direct swing, the SNP and Labour have the same retention rate of 86% and flow to each other of 9%. Numerically there are more SNP to Labour switchers as there are more SNP voters to start with. A direct flow from Tory to Labour (25%) disproportionally would advantage Labour more in seats where they are in third or even fourth.

So based on that model, the only seats Labour win are Kirkcaldy and East Lothian (currently Alba held) and the SNP take every seat from the Tories.
Logged
CumbrianLefty
CumbrianLeftie
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,815
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1483 on: October 19, 2022, 08:07:15 AM »

Surely by now Charles would reach out and suggest she resigns?

That would be.....unusual.
Logged
Property Representative of the Harold Holt Swimming Centre
TheTide
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,657
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1484 on: October 19, 2022, 08:17:11 AM »

Logged
CumbrianLefty
CumbrianLeftie
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,815
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1485 on: October 19, 2022, 08:20:11 AM »

But such a strongarmed vote "in favour" will be essentially meaningless.

The opposition (including in the Tories) won't go away, and fracking won't suddenly become more of a practical long term prospect than it was (not) before.

The "Tories last manifesto said the opposite" argument is pretty unanswerable too.
Logged
Torrain
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,056
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1486 on: October 19, 2022, 08:38:30 AM »


I rate Wragg, and think this is probably one of the better responses a Truss critic could take to this vote.

However, his position - “I’m being loyal, so my disloyalty counts” is a good summation of how febrile and damaged politics has become under this government.
Logged
CumbrianLefty
CumbrianLeftie
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,815
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1487 on: October 19, 2022, 08:42:15 AM »

She's flip flopped on the triple lock again, thus seemingly overruling Jeremy Hunt. In fact she even name dropped the Chancellor.

Time for another flip-flop or two before her time as PM is over, even if that's fairly soon Wink
Logged
Torrain
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,056
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1488 on: October 19, 2022, 08:47:34 AM »

Truss has pulled out of a scheduled visit (where she was expected to take questions) at the last minute. She confirmed she was going around 13.00, then cancelled half an hour later:
  • 12:33pm - visit announced via PM’s spokesman: The PM will this afternoon be visiting a British firm that specialises in automative technology “to hear from the kind of businesses driving UK innovation and growth”
  • 1:44pm - Downing St tells journalists the visit is off

Unclear whether this is her dodging questions, a genuine pressing matter, or if the government has been paralysed by more 1922 Committee drama.
Logged
Leading Political Consultant Ma Anand Sheela
Heat
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,026
Poland


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1489 on: October 19, 2022, 09:07:12 AM »
« Edited: October 19, 2022, 09:10:47 AM by Real clumsy women representation has never been tried »

Worth noting that the recent Scotland poll was commissioned by Alba. Who inserted themselves as a prompted choice.

In terms of flow of the vote from the five recent published polls, rather than direct swing, the SNP and Labour have the same retention rate of 86% and flow to each other of 9%. Numerically there are more SNP to Labour switchers as there are more SNP voters to start with. A direct flow from Tory to Labour (25%) disproportionally would advantage Labour more in seats where they are in third or even fourth.

So based on that model, the only seats Labour win are Kirkcaldy and East Lothian (currently Alba held) and the SNP take every seat from the Tories.
The problem with reifying these mid-term figures to that extent is that it requires you to take seriously the idea that Labour is on track to poll around 30% across Scotland, which is great by current standards but still historically poor, but also possibly get its best ever results in Banff and Buchan or Berwickshire. It's possible, I guess, I just wouldn't bet on it. It's still the Labour Party, for better or worse.

It's probably better to treat these in an impressionistic way for now. Pissed-off Tory voters are currently flocking to Labour everywhere but it's doubtful all of them will stick around. Some will go back, some might find the Lib Dems friendlier, some will stay home, a few may even decide they like Nicola Sturgeon after all. What anyone smart in SLab will actually be hoping for is that the sense that Labour is a viable alternative again and that the Tories are on the ropes will get more marginal SNP voters to switch or just not bother coming out. It's definitely not happening yet and it may not actually happen at all (I'm not in Scotland anymore so I have even less of an idea of how the 'fight the next election as a de facto referendum' play might work out than usual), but it did only start to happen in 2017 in roughly the last two weeks of the campaign.
Logged
CumbrianLefty
CumbrianLeftie
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,815
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1490 on: October 19, 2022, 09:14:34 AM »

Or to put it at its simplest, there are always some voters who like to back plausible winners.
Logged
Devout Centrist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,126
United States


Political Matrix
E: -99.99, S: -99.99

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1491 on: October 19, 2022, 09:58:12 AM »

Or to put it at its simplest, there are always some voters who like to back plausible winners.
Yes, and I reckon there’s a certain constituency in Scotland that runs headlong towards Labour when they show any signs of life.
Logged
Property Representative of the Harold Holt Swimming Centre
TheTide
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,657
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1492 on: October 19, 2022, 10:21:24 AM »

Braverman out, Shapps in. The Cameron clones are taking over.
Logged
Torrain
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,056
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1493 on: October 19, 2022, 10:22:06 AM »

Wow.
Logged
🦀🎂🦀🎂
CrabCake
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,265
Kiribati


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1494 on: October 19, 2022, 10:27:18 AM »

Smh Big Tofu strikes again
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,416


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1495 on: October 19, 2022, 10:29:51 AM »

So...how did PMQs go?
Logged
Torrain
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,056
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1496 on: October 19, 2022, 10:31:27 AM »

If reports are true - not sure which part is more shambolic. Truss replacing two of the four ministers inhabiting the Great Offices of State within a week? Or Truss appointing Grant Shapps, a man who has spent the entirety of her premiership trying to bring her down, into the cabinet.
Logged
Cassius
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,599


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1497 on: October 19, 2022, 10:31:50 AM »

Was she sacked or what? Not a good move in my opinion if so.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,416


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1498 on: October 19, 2022, 10:33:04 AM »

If reports are true - not sure which part is more shambolic. Truss replacing two of the four ministers inhabiting the Great Offices of State within a week? Or Truss appointing Grant Shapps, a man who has spent the entirety of her premiership trying to bring her down, into the cabinet.

Surely two holders of Great Offices of State sacked less than fifty days into a premiership is a record?
Logged
🦀🎂🦀🎂
CrabCake
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,265
Kiribati


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1499 on: October 19, 2022, 10:33:18 AM »

Braverman may be the shortest serving Home Secretary since George Nugent-Temple-Grenville, 1st Marquess of Buckingham, who was appointed by Pitt the Younger for three days in 1783.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 55 56 57 58 59 [60] 61 62 63 64 65 ... 230  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.058 seconds with 11 queries.