NJ-Senate 2008: Christie will Not Run
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 07, 2024, 06:52:15 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  NJ-Senate 2008: Christie will Not Run
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3
Author Topic: NJ-Senate 2008: Christie will Not Run  (Read 5087 times)
Conan
conan
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,140


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: January 09, 2007, 04:21:36 PM »
« edited: January 09, 2007, 05:49:55 PM by conan »

I will be supporting Baroni. He has proven that he can win in Democratic territory, look at the returns from his district, it is amazing.

Gormley is hinting at a US Senate run, but he will go nowhere, and rightfully so. And no, LoBiondo's district would not turn Democratic when he retires.
Actually it will. It went 50 Bush 49 Kerry. It's trending dem and dems are much better financed then reps in NJ. 3 of the GOPs NJ seats will flip when they open.
LoBiondo's seat is State Sen. - elect Whelans for the taking
State Dem reps who can run:
Assemblymen:
Van Drew
Albano
Whelan
Fisher
Whelan
State Senators:
Whelan (currently an assemblyman, is running for Gormely's Senate seat and I predict he'll win)

Reps:
Assembly:
Blee (running for Senate seat being vacated by Gormley)
Senate:
Gormely (retiring this year)
Asselta
Logged
Kevin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,424
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: January 09, 2007, 05:45:48 PM »

How about Christane Todd Whitman?
Logged
Conan
conan
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,140


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: January 09, 2007, 05:54:41 PM »

She'd be trashed. Too much baggage.
Logged
Kevin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,424
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: January 09, 2007, 07:36:31 PM »

She'd be trashed. Too much baggage.

What about the baggage of your man Lautenburg and besides being corrupt as humanly possible seems to be a big plus for a canidate in New Jersey elections.   
Logged
Conan
conan
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,140


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: January 09, 2007, 07:43:33 PM »

She'd be trashed. Too much baggage.

What about the baggage of your man Lautenburg and besides being corrupt as humanly possible seems to be a big plus for a canidate in New Jersey elections.   
Lautenberg has never been called corrupt by anyone, republican, democrat or anyone else. Besides we all know baggage only counts when you're a republican in NJ.
Logged
Yates
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,873


Political Matrix
E: -0.38, S: 1.54

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: January 09, 2007, 08:01:23 PM »

Perhaps the Republicans' most electable potential candidate is Representative Chris Smith.
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: January 09, 2007, 08:55:53 PM »
« Edited: January 09, 2007, 08:57:35 PM by Verily »

Perhaps the Republicans' most electable potential candidate is Representative Chris Smith.

Anti-abortion = not electable state-wide in New Jersey. Especially not when you're as rabid as Smith about it.
Logged
Yates
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,873


Political Matrix
E: -0.38, S: 1.54

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: January 09, 2007, 09:20:55 PM »

Perhaps the Republicans' most electable potential candidate is Representative Chris Smith.

Anti-abortion = not electable state-wide in New Jersey. Especially not when you're as rabid as Smith about it.

Alright.  Perhaps Mike Ferguson?
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: January 09, 2007, 09:35:41 PM »

Perhaps the Republicans' most electable potential candidate is Representative Chris Smith.

Anti-abortion = not electable state-wide in New Jersey. Especially not when you're as rabid as Smith about it.

Alright.  Perhaps Mike Ferguson?

He almost turned what should have been an easy victory into defeat this year; he's a terrible campaigner. (Most of the reason Stender did so well is because Ferguson ran ads calling her "Stender the spender", giving her name recognition and looking pathetically childish at the same time.)
Logged
MAS117
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,206
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: January 09, 2007, 09:45:17 PM »

Perhaps the Republicans' most electable potential candidate is Representative Chris Smith.

Anti-abortion = not electable state-wide in New Jersey. Especially not when you're as rabid as Smith about it.

Alright.  Perhaps Mike Ferguson?

Ferguson has already stated he intends to run for reelection to the House in 2008.
Logged
HardRCafé
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,364
Italy
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: January 09, 2007, 10:54:23 PM »

Besides we all know baggage only counts when you're a republican in NJ.

So sad.  So true.
Logged
Yates
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,873


Political Matrix
E: -0.38, S: 1.54

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: January 09, 2007, 10:54:51 PM »

Alright.  I assume that Scott Garrett, Jim Saxton, and Frank LoBiondo, are too conservative for the state.  What about Rodney Frelinghuysen? (Forgive my spelling.)
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,498
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: January 09, 2007, 11:01:35 PM »

Alright.  I assume that Scott Garrett, Jim Saxton, and Frank LoBiondo, are too conservative for the state.  What about Rodney Frelinghuysen? (Forgive my spelling.)

People distrust him because he's from a family notorious for corruption, even though he isn't himself, much like Harold Ford, Jr. However he's nowhere near as charismatic as Ford.
Logged
HardRCafé
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,364
Italy
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: January 09, 2007, 11:33:10 PM »

People distrust him because he's from a family notorious for corruption, even though he isn't himself, much like Harold Ford, Jr. However he's nowhere near as charismatic as Ford.

People in Minnesota.
Logged
Conan
conan
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,140


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: January 09, 2007, 11:50:00 PM »

Alright.  I assume that Scott Garrett, Jim Saxton, and Frank LoBiondo, are too conservative for the state.  What about Rodney Frelinghuysen? (Forgive my spelling.)

People distrust him because he's from a family notorious for corruption, even though he isn't himself, much like Harold Ford, Jr. However he's nowhere near as charismatic as Ford.
People don't associate him with corruption, he's probably the most respected Republican in our delegation.
Logged
Kevin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,424
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: January 10, 2007, 02:19:06 PM »

Alright.  I assume that Scott Garrett, Jim Saxton, and Frank LoBiondo, are too conservative for the state.  What about Rodney Frelinghuysen? (Forgive my spelling.)

People distrust him because he's from a family notorious for corruption, even though he isn't himself, much like Harold Ford, Jr. However he's nowhere near as charismatic as Ford.
People don't associate him with corruption, he's probably the most respected Republican in our delegation.

Your clalling NJ Republicans corrupt isn't that kind of hypacritcal?
Logged
Conan
conan
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,140


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: January 10, 2007, 03:11:01 PM »

Actually it will. It went 50 Bush 49 Kerry. It's trending dem and dems are much better financed then reps in NJ. 3 of the GOPs NJ seats will flip when they open.
LoBiondo's seat is State Sen. - elect Whelans for the taking
State Dem reps who can run:
Assemblymen:
Van Drew
Albano
Whelan
Fisher
Whelan
State Senators:
Whelan (currently an assemblyman, is running for Gormely's Senate seat and I predict he'll win)

Reps:
Assembly:
Blee (running for Senate seat being vacated by Gormley)
Senate:
Gormely (retiring this year)
Asselta

The next Congressman from the Second district will be Nick Asselta, who has strong ties to the AFL-CIO and who is very popular with a large base. Whelan will not run for Congress, Van Drew likely will.

Don't be so sure Whelan will win the Senate, he got off easy in 2005 because the Republicans dropped the ball by not exposing his actual record, he won't be so lucky this time.
The republican party of NJ is incompetent. Nick Asselta may have strong ties to the AFL-CIO but let's not forget that the Democratic party is the AFL-CIO. I am pretty sure a dem will win the House seat when it opens. Maybe not Gormely's senate seat but it's still close and can happen there.
Logged
Conan
conan
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,140


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: January 10, 2007, 03:12:03 PM »

Alright.  I assume that Scott Garrett, Jim Saxton, and Frank LoBiondo, are too conservative for the state.  What about Rodney Frelinghuysen? (Forgive my spelling.)

People distrust him because he's from a family notorious for corruption, even though he isn't himself, much like Harold Ford, Jr. However he's nowhere near as charismatic as Ford.
People don't associate him with corruption, he's probably the most respected Republican in our delegation.

Your clalling NJ Republicans corrupt isn't that kind of hypacritcal?
I just said the man wasn't corrupt!
Logged
Adlai Stevenson
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,403
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: January 10, 2007, 03:18:29 PM »

The odd thing about New Jersey is that it always seems to be a close race that ends up being won by around 5%-10% by the Democrats.  The Republicans have been disappointed so often in the state.  Eventually, surely one of them must break through?  Kean, Jr. arguably was the candidate to do it and he lost by a wider margin than Bush did in 2004. 

I am not particularly proud of Jon Corzine, Frank Lautenberg and especially Robert Menendez.  In fact I hope Lautenberg retires and gives Robert Andrews the chance to run. 

If I were a Republican I would not bother giving any attention to New Jersey until the 2009 gubernatorial race; Corzine conceivably could be vulernable and Kean, Jr. would be more likely to succeed.  The GOP have poured so much money into the state in 2002, 2004 and 2006 and ended up without anything to show for it.  As someone said, with the funds diverted to Kean, Jr. in 2006 they probably could have kept Virginia and Montana and thus the Senate. 
Logged
agcatter
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,740


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: January 10, 2007, 04:02:42 PM »

NJ is a waste of GOP resources.  They have no chance.  No more realistic than Dems trying to win a Senate seat in Texas.
Logged
Kevin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,424
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: January 10, 2007, 04:34:41 PM »

The odd thing about New Jersey is that it always seems to be a close race that ends up being won by around 5%-10% by the Democrats.  The Republicans have been disappointed so often in the state.  Eventually, surely one of them must break through?  Kean, Jr. arguably was the candidate to do it and he lost by a wider margin than Bush did in 2004. 

I am not particularly proud of Jon Corzine, Frank Lautenberg and especially Robert Menendez.  In fact I hope Lautenberg retires and gives Robert Andrews the chance to run. 

If I were a Republican I would not bother giving any attention to New Jersey until the 2009 gubernatorial race; Corzine conceivably could be vulernable and Kean, Jr. would be more likely to succeed.  The GOP have poured so much money into the state in 2002, 2004 and 2006 and ended up without anything to show for it.  As someone said, with the funds diverted to Kean, Jr. in 2006 they probably could have kept Virginia and Montana and thus the Senate. 

Had this been a Repubican year I think Menedez would have most likely lost.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #46 on: January 10, 2007, 06:27:21 PM »

I promised myself that I wouldn't get worked up about GOP chances here because NJ is always a let down. I will, however, still follow the race and wish the best of luck to the GOP nominee. I'm now solidly behind Bill Baroni. He can make it a good race.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #47 on: January 10, 2007, 06:39:39 PM »


Actually it will. It went 50 Bush 49 Kerry. It's trending dem and dems are much better financed then reps in NJ. 3 of the GOPs NJ seats will flip when they open.
LoBiondo's seat is State Sen. - elect Whelans for the taking
State Dem reps who can run:
Assemblymen:
Van Drew
Albano
Whelan
Fisher
Whelan
State Senators:
Whelan (currently an assemblyman, is running for Gormely's Senate seat and I predict he'll win)

Reps:
Assembly:
Blee (running for Senate seat being vacated by Gormley)
Senate:
Gormely (retiring this year)
Asselta

Just because Bush only won by a point doesn't mean the seat is going Dem. Van Drew would be strong but what else do the others offer? Why would Whelan be a lock for the seat?


Also, what are you talking about in regards to Whelan running for the State Senate? I've only heard of one Dem running so far. There hasn't been a statement by Whelan in the last day has there?
Logged
Conan
conan
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,140


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #48 on: January 10, 2007, 08:45:21 PM »
« Edited: January 10, 2007, 09:11:25 PM by conan »


Actually it will. It went 50 Bush 49 Kerry. It's trending dem and dems are much better financed then reps in NJ. 3 of the GOPs NJ seats will flip when they open.
LoBiondo's seat is State Sen. - elect Whelans for the taking
State Dem reps who can run:
Assemblymen:
Van Drew
Albano
Whelan
Fisher
Whelan
State Senators:
Whelan (currently an assemblyman, is running for Gormely's Senate seat and I predict he'll win)

Reps:
Assembly:
Blee (running for Senate seat being vacated by Gormley)
Senate:
Gormely (retiring this year)
Asselta

Just because Bush only won by a point doesn't mean the seat is going Dem. Van Drew would be strong but what else do the others offer? Why would Whelan be a lock for the seat?


Also, what are you talking about in regards to Whelan running for the State Senate? I've only heard of one Dem running so far. There hasn't been a statement by Whelan in the last day has there?

Well by the time the seat opens up it's pretty much 50-50 (In 2008 or 2010) and Dems have greater representation in that area a long with more candidates. We also have the money and the local labor support most likely. The GOP is an incompetent failure in NJ. Our operation is just much better. I think Corzine carried the district too and probably Al and Menendez. I am pretty sure Whelan is running, I think I read it on politicsnj.com

Edit: Corzine did carry the district
Corzine 92564  -   54%
Forrester 80569 -  46%
Municipal numbers arent out for 2006 yet so I can't confirm Menendez
Al had a substantial lead in the counties where they are fully included in the district so it's safe to assume he won it.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #49 on: January 10, 2007, 10:12:23 PM »


Well by the time the seat opens up it's pretty much 50-50 (In 2008 or 2010) and Dems have greater representation in that area a long with more candidates.

No, that's not necessarily true. You can't say that it will turn out that way with each passing year just because of the Presidential candidates. In a McCain vs. Hillary race, would you say that it would end up 50-50? I doubt it.

I wouldn't say that the Dems have more representation there. You have some notable Assemblymen and possibly a State Senator soon but I am pretty sure that the GOP still dominates on the local level.

 
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

The growing influence from outside areas like Camden definetley works in your favor in regards to man power, money, etc. I will also concede that the NJ GOP is a mess. However, if the local groups band together under the leadership of the widely influential LoBiondo, the GOP is still favored. The local parties will do everything they can to keep that seat.

As for Whelan, I was informed that he has been mentioned for the seat for awhile but has not announced anything. I thought you were claiming that he was definetley in. A race with Whelan in it will be interesting.

Edit: Corzine did carry the district
Corzine 92564  -   54%
Forrester 80569 -  46%
Municipal numbers arent out for 2006 yet so I can't confirm Menendez
Al had a substantial lead in the counties where they are fully included in the district so it's safe to assume he won it.
[/quote]
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.049 seconds with 12 queries.