Proportional EV split for 1936
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 09:28:26 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Proportional EV split for 1936
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Proportional EV split for 1936  (Read 1566 times)
RBH
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,210


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 28, 2006, 11:01:54 PM »

Here's the split of votes, leaving out the at-large votes.

AL: 8 FDR, 1 Landon
AZ: 1 FDR
AR: 6 FDR, 1 Landon
CA: 14 FDR, 6 Landon
CO: 2 FDR, 2 Landon
CT: 3 FDR, 3 Landon
DE: 1 FDR
FL: 4 FDR, 1 Landon
GA: 9 FDR, 1 Landon
ID: 1 FDR, 1 Landon
IL: 16 FDR, 11 Landon
IN: 7 FDR, 5 Landon
IA: 5 FDR, 4 Landon
KS: 4 FDR, 3 Landon
KY: 5 FDR, 4 Landon
LA: 7 FDR, 1 Landon
ME: 2 Landon, 1 FDR
MD: 4 FDR, 2 Landon
MA: 8 FDR, 6 Landon, 1 Lemke
MI: 10 FDR, 6 Landon, 1 Lemke
MN: 6 FDR, 3 Landon
MS: 7 FDR
MO: 8 FDR, 5 Landon
MT: 1 FDR, 1 Landon
NE: 3 FDR, 2 Landon
NV: 1 FDR,
NH: 1 FDR, 1 Landon
NJ: 8 FDR, 6 Landon
NM: 1 FDR
NY: 27 FDR, 17 Landon, 1 Thomas
NC: 8 FDR, 3 Landon
ND: 1 FDR, 1 Landon
OH: 14 FDR, 9 Landon, 1 Lemke
OK: 6 FDR, 3 Landon
OR: 2 FDR, 1 Landon
PA: 19 FDR, 14 Landon, 1 Lemke
RI: 1 FDR, 1 Landon
SC: 6 FDR
SD: 1 FDR, 1 Landon
TN: 6 FDR, 3 Landon
TX: 18 FDR, 3 Landon
UT: 1 FDR, 1 Landon
VT: 1 Landon
VA: 6 FDR, 3 Landon
WA: 4 FDR, 2 Landon
WV: 4 FDR, 2 Landon
WI: 7 FDR, 3 Landon
WY: 1 FDR

Total: 284 FDR, 146 Landon, 4 Lemke, 1 Thomas

That's a 65/34 split, due to the South.

North: 199-129 FDR, 60/39 split in the EVs, 59/38 split in the popular vote
South: 85-17 FDR, 83/17 split in the EVs, 81/19 split in the popular vote

that'll happen when 23% of the Congress seats went to an area contributing 9% of the vote.

But yeah, with proportional EVs, we find that Landon only got really whupped, as opposed to being totally whupped.
Logged
Tetro Kornbluth
Gully Foyle
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,845
Ireland, Republic of


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 02, 2007, 01:00:06 PM »

Using that same method for 1912:

Alabama: Wilson 8
Arizona: Wilson 1
Arkansas: Wilson 5 Taft 1 TR 1
California: TR 5 Wilson 5 Debs 1 (Taft not on Ballot)
Colorado: Wilson 3 TR 2 Taft 1
Connecticut: Wilson 2 Taft 2 TR 1
Delaware: Wilson 1
Florida: Wilson 4 (Given the level of splitting between the candidates after Wilson this was hard to determine.)
Georgia: Wilson 10 TR 2
Idaho: Wilson 1 Taft 1
Illinois: Wilson 10 TR 9 Taft 6 Debs 2
Indiana: Wilson 6 TR 4 Taft 3
Iowa: Wilson 5 TR 4 Taft 3
Kansas: Wilson 3 TR 3 Taft 2
Kentucky: Wilson 5 Taft 3 TR 3
Louisana: Wilson 7 TR 1
Maine: Wilson 2 TR 2
Maryland: Wilson 4 TR 2 Taft 2
Massachutes: Wilson 6 Taft 5 TR 5
Michigan: TR 5 Taft 4 Wilson 4
Minnesota: TR 4 Wilson 3 Taft 2 Debs 1
Mississippi: Wilson 8
Missouri: Wilson 8 Taft 5 TR 3
Montana: Wilson 1 TR 1
Nebraska: Wilson 3 TR 2 Taft 1
Nevada: Wilson 1
New Hampshire: Wilson 1 Taft 1
New Jersey: Wilson 5 TR 4 Taft 3
New Mexico: Wilson 1
New York: Wilson 18 Taft 12 TR 11 Debs 2
North Carolina: Wilson 6 TR 3 Taft 1
North Dakota: Wilson 1 TR 1 Taft 1
Ohio: Wilson 9 Taft 6 TR 5 Debs 2
Oklahoma: Wilson 4 Taft 3 Debs 1 (TR not on ballot)
Oregon: Wilson 1 TR 1 Taft 1
Pennsyvlania: TR 13 Wilson 12 Taft 8 Debs 2 Chafin 1
Rhode Island: Wilson 1 Taft 1 TR 1
South Carolina: Wilson 7
South Dakota: TR 2 Wilson 1 (Taft not on ballot)
Tennesee: Wilson 5 Taft 3 TR 2
Texas: Wilson 13 TR 2 Taft 1 Debs 1
Utah: Taft 1 Wilson 1
Vermont: Taft 1 TR 1 (Only state Wilson doesn't register)
Virginia: Wilson 6 Taft 2 TR 2
Washington: TR 2 Wilson 1 Taft 1 Debs 1
West Virginia: Wilson 3 TR 2 Taft 1
Wisconsin: Wilson 4 Taft 4 TR 2 Debs 1
Wyoming: Wilson 1

Wilson 291, TR 131, Taft 94, Debs 14, Chafin 1
Logged
Tetro Kornbluth
Gully Foyle
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,845
Ireland, Republic of


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 02, 2007, 02:25:10 PM »

1860:

Alabama: Breckinbridge 4 Bell 2 Douglas 1
Arkansas: Breckinbridge 1 Bell 1
California: Lincoln 1 Douglas 1
Connecticut: Lincoln 2 Douglas 1 Breckinbridge 1
Delaware: Breckinbridge 1
Florida: Breckinbridge 1
Georgia: Breckinbridge 4 Bell 3 Douglas 1
Illinois: Lincoln 5 Douglas 4
Indiana: Lincoln 6 Douglas 5
Iowa: Lincoln 1 Douglas 1
Kentucky: Bell 4 Breckinbridge 4 Douglas 2
Louisana: Breckinbridge 2 Bell 2
Maine: Lincoln 4 Douglas 2
Maryland: Breckinbridge 4 Bell 4
Massachutes: Lincoln 7 Douglas 2 Bell 2
Michigan: Lincoln 2 Douglas 2
Minnesota: Lincoln 1 Douglas 1
Mississippi: Breckinbridge 2 Bell 2
Missouri: Douglas 2 Bell 2 Breckinbridge 2 Lincoln 1
New Hampshire: Lincoln 2 Douglas 1
New Jersey: Douglas 4 Lincoln 3
New York: Lincoln 18 Douglas 15
North Carolina: Breckinbridge 4 Bell 4
Ohio: Lincoln 11 Douglas 8 Bell 1 Breckinbridge 1
Oregon: Lincoln 1
Pennsylvania: Lincoln 14 Breckinbridge 9 Douglas 1 Bell 1
Rhode Island: Lincoln 1 Douglas 1
South Carolina: Breckinbridge 6 (Not sure how else to count this..)
Tennesee: Bell 5 Breckinbridge 4 Douglas 1
Texas: Breckinbridge 2
Vermont: Lincoln 2 Douglas 1
Virginia: Bell 6 Breckinbridge 6 Douglas 1
Wisconsin: Lincoln 2 Douglas 1

Lincoln 115, Breckinbridge 78, Douglas 62, Bell 45


Logged
RBH
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,210


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 02, 2007, 05:45:00 PM »

Using that same method for 1912:

(snip)

Wilson 291, TR 131, Taft 94, Debs 14, Chafin 1

House Seats only: Wilson 210, TR 111, Taft 96, Debs 17, Chafin 1

The differences in our lists

Alabama: Wilson 7, TR 2, Taft 1
Arkansas: Wilson 4, Taft 2, TR 1
Colorado: Wilson 2, TR 1, Taft 1
Georgia: Wilson 9, TR 2, Taft 1
Indiana: Wilson 6, TR 3, Taft 3, Debs 1
Iowa: Wilson 4, TR 4, Taft 3
Louisana: Wilson 6, TR 1, Debs 1
Maine: Wilson 2, TR 1, Taft 1
Maryland: Wilson 3, TR 2, Taft 1
Missouri: Wilson 7, Taft 5, TR 3, Debs 1
Texas: Wilson 13, TR 2, Taft 2, Debs 1
Virginia: Wilson 7, Taft 2, TR 1
Washington: TR 2 Wilson 1 Taft 1 Debs 1

One source of differences is probably due to my method.

Any candidate who gets half of the percentage needed for one vote gets votes counted for the distribution. The votes counted there are used as the total sum. Then the percentages come from dividing the votes by that total.

Then in cases where rounding everybody up creates too many votes then the percentage furthest from being rounded up is rounded down.

Virginia, 1912

Wilson: 6.67
Taft: 1.72
Roosevelt: 1.61

Since there's 10 votes and rounding up creates 11 votes, then only Wilson and Taft get rounded up and Roosevelt is rounded down.
Logged
Tetro Kornbluth
Gully Foyle
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,845
Ireland, Republic of


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 06, 2007, 12:38:41 PM »

1856:
Alabama: Buchanan 4 Fillmore 3
Arkansas: Buchanan 1 Fillmore 1
California: Buchanan 1 Fillmore 1
Connecticut: Fremont 2 Buchanan 2
Delaware: Buchanan 1
Florida: Buchanan 1
Georgia: Buchanan 5 Fillmore 3
Iowa: Fremont 1 Buchanan 1
Illinois: Buchanan 4 Fremont 4 Fillmore 1
Indiana: Buchanan 6 Fremont 4 Fillmore 1
Kentucky: Buchanan 5 Fillmore 5
Louisana: Buchanan 2 Fillmore 2
Maine: Fremont 4 Buchanan 2
Mass: Fremont 7 Buchanan 2 Fillmore 1
Michigan: Fremont 2 Buchanan 2
Miss: Buchanan 3 Fillmore 2
Missouri: Buchanan 4 Fillmore 3
New Hampshire: Fremont 2 Buchanan 1
New Jersey: Buchanan 2 Fremont 2 Fillmore 1
New York: Fremont 15 Buchanan 11 Fillmore 7
North Carolina: Buchanan 4 Fillmore 4
Ohio: Fremont 10 Buchanan 9 Fillmore 2
Pennsylvania: Buchanan 13 Fremont 8 Fillmore 4
Rhode Island: Fremont 1 Buchanan 1
South Carolina: Buchanan 6 (How else?)
Tennesse: Buchanan 5 Fillmore 5
Texas: Buchanan 1 Fillmore 1
Vermont: Fremont 2 Buchanan 1
Virginia: Buchanan 8 Fillmore 5
Wisconsin: Fremont 2 Buchanan 1

Buchanan 150, Fremont 88, Fillmore 57. Buchanan wins a majority of just 2 electoral votes.
Logged
Starbucks Union Thug HokeyPuck
HockeyDude
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,376
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 06, 2007, 05:59:16 PM »

Someone do 1992, just interested
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.035 seconds with 11 queries.