TX-Gov: ChismStrat/Blueprint (D): Abbott + 19 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 10:26:13 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2022 Gubernatorial Election Polls
  TX-Gov: ChismStrat/Blueprint (D): Abbott + 19 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: TX-Gov: ChismStrat/Blueprint (D): Abbott + 19  (Read 1341 times)
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,276
United States


« on: June 14, 2022, 01:32:10 PM »

Very telling that this same poll only finds Trump ahead of Biden by 6 points in a hypothetical 2024 rematch (44-38), which really contradicts the posters who are implying that this poll was designed to favor Republicans. Again, a case can be made that the Trump years were an unusual drag on the TX GOP and that Trump himself was an atrocious candidate for the state who underperformed rather substantially in a way other Republicans (including DeSantis) wouldn’t. While the state will likely still drift into Battleground status in the medium term, the popular (and at times smug) comparison between "GA 2016" and TX 2020/today was extremely superficial and often resembled wishful thinking. There was no room for any impactful pro-R countertrend in GA after 2016 the way there is in South TX/the RGV/metro parts with a high concentration of Latino voters in TX, and there’s nothing like the lopsided Atlanta-based migration of core Democratic groups (esp. AA voters) going on in TX (nor does any metro in TX hold the same power over the entire state that Atlanta holds over GA). Obviously many Democrats are migrating to TX, but if the pool of migrants is just way more diverse overall and consisting of a higher share of R-leaning and swing voters, it’s not going to be nearly as beneficial to the party. This is not even to mention that we’re dealing with entirely different partisan baselines in both states.

I maintain that MN is a closer analogy to TX than GA (or AZ) in that both MN and TX are states which should be competitive in major wave elections and cannot be taken for granted by the dominant parties, but which are not going to flip in any close-ish national election in the foreseeable future (although I do think MN is closer to flipping in a "neutral" year than TX is in spite of the 2020 trend in MN).
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 13 queries.