Could Mastriano be the Gillum of 2022 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 11:34:05 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Could Mastriano be the Gillum of 2022 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Could Mastriano be the Gillum of 2022  (Read 2265 times)
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,245


« on: June 14, 2022, 12:47:46 PM »

If anything, he's going to be the DeSantis of 2022. The guy everybody expects to lose but ends up winning.

People conveniently forget now, but DeSantis was similarly cast as unelectable, super "pro Trump" and far-right. And the vast majority of people here bought into that, including Republicans. Hell, he's still characterized like that today, it's just that Democrats have become more pessimistic in Florida so they don't think he'll lose. But it's really important to remember accurately because we're now making the same exact mistakes and assumptions today, only with more drama around election administration. Shapiro is probably a better candidate than Gillum, though, but nobody was talking as if Gillum was the bad candidate in 2018. It was all about how extreme and bad DeSantis was.

This is a bit of rewriting history. DeSantis came off like an awful candidate (and just plain dumb too), but he was never the extreme far-right candidate Mastriano is. Not really a comparison there. DeSantis was clearly right, but he was nowhere near as extreme as M is, and he definitely wasn't seen that way by many. If anything, he was just seen as more of a doofus.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 12 queries.