Who is more of a person?

[Georg Ebner]

A person/individuum is only, who is fighting inside his animalic life and is at the same time - with his selfConsciousness - standing aside as an "alien" obServer.

That does not fit to animals or demented/mad human beings, but that is not their fault and as a result they deserve our respect and benevolent leadership.
And does probably also not fit to an <early> fetus, but they are also not guilty and can be expected to become human beings, what makes abortions a sin.
Those, who have sunken into KANT's "self-inflicted im-maturity" - what, to be honest, includes all those here, who can no longer detect differences of themselves to apes or mean, that "rationality" or "profit motive" (!) would be unique to us -, can not be excused, though.

[Georg Ebner]

Those, who wonder, why an era of selfDEIfication has sunken into animality,, may read the beginning of the "Textos" by GOMEZ DAVILA (span. ed. 1959: pp. 5-9, 17-38 and especially 47-61):

The supra-animalic human is born, as soon as he realizes, that on the one hand he must reach his telos, on the other hand he cannot. Not only accidentally - because he cannot conquer the whole universe [and anyWay: since KANT we know, that the universe is anti-nomical: we can imagine it neither as endless nor as having an end], he cannot be immortal aso. -; but essentially - because he is not a static angel having history, but being history (albeit being not only history).
But as soon as this antAgonism creator-creature is no longer experienced by the creature, it sinks back into animality.
"The human being is born with the birth of GOD [in human mind, G.E.] and dies with the death of GOD [in human mind, G.E.]." (idem)

"The human being is neither an angel [or a GOD, G.E.] nor a beast. And those, who make him an angel [or a beast, G.E.], make him a beast." (PASCAL)

"The path of modern formation goes From humanity By nationality To bestiality." (GRILLPARZER 1849)