Missouri Gubernatorial Race 2008: Matt Blunt v. Jay Nixon
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 02, 2024, 11:22:45 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Missouri Gubernatorial Race 2008: Matt Blunt v. Jay Nixon
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Missouri Gubernatorial Race 2008: Matt Blunt v. Jay Nixon  (Read 1401 times)
RBH
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,211


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 16, 2006, 02:25:37 PM »

And maybe someone else will run.

Matt Blunt: 37 on election day 2008, Secretary of state from 2001 to 2005, State Legislator from 1999 to 2001. Currently has a 36% job approval rating after a first year where he kicked a bunch of people off of medicaid, while also endorsing embryonic stem cell research.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Jay Nixon: Attorney General from 1993 to 2009, ran for the Senate in 1988 and 1998. Got squashed by Danforth in 1988 and lost by 9 points to Kit Bond in 1998. Won re-election with 59% in 1996, 60% in 2000, and 60% in 2004.

So basically this is a matchup between the unpopular Boy Wonder, Matt Blunt, and Jay Nixon, who isn't totally loved by Democrats.

Of course, the fun occurs down ballot, where I'm pretty sure someone like Gibbons or Koster could run for Attorney General, and i'm also suspecting that Matt Bartle could try and run for Attorney General.

But yeah, take your pick, Little Blunt or Jay Nixon
Logged
Nutmeg
thepolitic
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,922
United States Minor Outlying Islands


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 16, 2006, 03:06:53 PM »

Nixon should easily have this one.
Logged
RBH
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,211


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 16, 2006, 04:03:28 PM »

Matt Bartle is a State Senator from Lee's Summit (Jackson County). He won re-election this year, and also defeated a moderate who was challenging him.

Some portions of Bartle bills include:

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.

And here's the bio on Bartle:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

As for Steelman. She won't win. She'd have to make some pretty big advances into Blunt's base to pull off a victory.

Also, keep the state elections the way they are.
Logged
RBH
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,211


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 16, 2006, 04:37:53 PM »

Bartle won his primary by a 60/37 margin.

As for keeping them the way they are. It keeps turnout high for state elections.
Logged
Adlai Stevenson
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,403
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 16, 2006, 04:59:39 PM »

According to a poll earlier this year:

MISSOURI GOVERNOR
Nixon (D) 52%
Blunt (R) 39%

Logged
RBH
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,211


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 16, 2006, 05:04:27 PM »

Well, let's take a look at how the state split in voting in the August GOP primary



Southeast: 6%
St. Louis: 23%
Col/Jeff: 9%
Kansas City: 11%
Rolla: 7%
Southwest: 26%
West Central: 9%
Northwest: 5%
Northeast: 4%

In 2004, those percentages were 5% in SEMO, 24% in STL, 8% in CJ, 13% in KC, 6% in Rolla, 25% in SW MO, 5% in NW MO, and 5% in NEMO

So, for a hypothetical Hulshof/Blunt/Talent/Steelman race, here's how it would break down

Southeast: Possible Steelman plurality
St. Louis: Talent wins
Col/Jeff: Hulshof wins
Kansas City: Wide open
Rolla: Steelman wins
Southwest: Blunt wins
West Central: Wide open
Northwest: Wide open
Northeast: Hulshof wins, 2/3rds of voters there vote in the Democratic primary anyways

I doubt that Talent or Hulshof will run.

And Steelman only wins if somebody strong runs for office out of Springfield or Joplin, and splits votes from Blunt.

But, I'd rather face Blunt than Steelman. Sorta like how Republicans would have rather faced Holden instead of McCaskill.

As for Callahan running statewide, I doubt it'll happen.
Logged
RBH
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,211


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 16, 2006, 05:16:23 PM »

And here's some maps.

Treasurer: Steelman (R) v. Powell (D)



Secretary of State: Carnahan (D) v. The Wicked Witch of the East (R)

Logged
RBH
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,211


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 16, 2006, 06:10:15 PM »

Yeah, sure. He hasn't really done anything wrong in his job.

And here's some Attorney General maps.

Attorney General: Nixon (D) v. Chris Byrd (R)



And from 1996: Nixon v. Bredemeier



Southwest Missouri splits

2004: 51/46 Byrd
1996: 49/47 Nixon
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 11 queries.