2004 User Predictions - Discussion (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 06:28:32 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election
  2004 User Predictions - Discussion (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 2004 User Predictions - Discussion  (Read 870924 times)
CTguy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 742


« on: March 14, 2004, 06:45:45 AM »

Republicans wouldn't support that because it would change apportionment.  Right now most prison populations are in congressional districts that are held by republicans and they count as part of the  total a district needs to be valid.  I think some in upstate New York are so large they are almost half the district.  These people can't vote but Republicans who run in the districts there like to keep them because they make their real district size small and easy to run in.
Logged
CTguy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 742


« Reply #1 on: March 14, 2004, 07:08:21 AM »

it's not bad bad in terms of the sheer number of prisoners.  No, I'll give you that.  It's not like districts are dominated by prison populations.  But I think it's bad in the sense that it benefits one party almost unilaterally: Republicans.  Because most prisons are in rural areas that are represented by Republican Congresmen.  In a big state like New York if you took out all the prison populations, Republicans would probably lose an entire district.
Logged
CTguy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 742


« Reply #2 on: March 17, 2004, 10:21:18 AM »

Florida will definitely be in play.  And I think it is more likely Kerry will win it for 2 reasons:

1.) The cuban vote, which Bush won in 2000 by an 8-1 margin, is not nearly as energized because of some refugee policies.  

2.) The new voters in the state since 2000 seem more likely to vote for Kerry since 3 groups that have increased their ratio of the population are blacks, non-cuban hispanics, and jewish americans.  

Why else would Bush be spending so much money there 8 months before the election?
Logged
CTguy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 742


« Reply #3 on: March 19, 2004, 03:08:11 PM »

That's bull.  

If it looks like a duck and quacks a duck then it's a freaking duck.

His voting record is clearly republican on a wide range of issues.  He is less moderate than many Republican senators.  
Logged
CTguy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 742


« Reply #4 on: March 22, 2004, 06:08:19 AM »

Colin Powell would never win, especially not in the south as someone else pointed out...

Lets not forget the fact that race is still a huge factor, especially in primaries when more extreme voters turn out.

1/10 voters still believe Interracial marriage should be banned...  (http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2004-03-21-gay-marriage_x.htm)

A higher ratio in the south where most Republican primary delegates come from.  Colin Powell would have no chance of winning a Republican nomination...  and he is too conservative to win a Democratic nomination.

The country is clearly not ready for a black president because there are still too many biggots out there who don't even think interracial marriage is ok... and they tend to be older and they tend to vote more than anyone else, especially in primaries.  

But I don't mind not having Colin Powell as President, he is pathetic.  
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 10 queries.