Was it expected before the election that Dukakis would do so well in rural areas?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 08:06:24 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Was it expected before the election that Dukakis would do so well in rural areas?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Was it expected before the election that Dukakis would do so well in rural areas?  (Read 1026 times)
Matty
boshembechle
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,967


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 20, 2022, 10:42:57 PM »

Of course the farm crisis was going to hurt the incumbent party, but was it anticipated just how well Dukakis would do in the plains and places like iowa and Montana?

To this day Democratic presidents haven’t matched him in some of these places, not even bill clinton.

Logged
NOVA Green
Oregon Progressive
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,454
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 21, 2022, 09:01:05 PM »

Of course the farm crisis was going to hurt the incumbent party, but was it anticipated just how well Dukakis would do in the plains and places like iowa and Montana?

To this day Democratic presidents haven’t matched him in some of these places, not even bill clinton.



I remember following the national maps by state post DEM / PUB convention in '88 in Newsweek and US News and World Report showing Dukakis performing very well in many of these places.

Even places like Kentucky, Tennessee, and Arkansas appeared to be polling very well into early October.

Deal with Dukakis surge in farming country wasn't really represented in many statewide polls in '88.

Recall a really decent article in Congressional Quarterly a couple months after the election that showed how extensive the swings were in farm country using county data.

Logged
Liberalrocks
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,932
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -4.35

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 22, 2022, 03:03:45 PM »

In addition to Montana, South Dakota always really stood out to me. In just how close Dukakis got to carrying it. Mondale had been crushed there by Reagan in 84 but Iowa was much closer.  I know it’s only 3 electoral votes and was hardly worth an effort, but I wonder if the (horribly run) Dukakis campaign had any idea how close they were there and that it wasn’t going to be the normal +20 point GOP margin. Would have been quite the map had South Dakota been Democratic that year in an otherwise electoral college landslide.
Logged
Matty
boshembechle
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,967


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 23, 2022, 01:37:53 AM »

In addition to Montana, South Dakota always really stood out to me. In just how close Dukakis got to carrying it. Mondale had been crushed there by Reagan in 84 but Iowa was much closer.  I know it’s only 3 electoral votes and was hardly worth an effort, but I wonder if the (horribly run) Dukakis campaign had any idea how close they were there and that it wasn’t going to be the normal +20 point GOP margin. Would have been quite the map had South Dakota been Democratic that year in an otherwise electoral college landslide.

Things must have been absolutely awful in some of these areas if usually reliable conservative Republicans crossed en masse to vote for a New England liberal
Logged
NOVA Green
Oregon Progressive
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,454
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 25, 2022, 05:25:23 PM »

In addition to the most obvious Dukakis over-performance in various parts of the rural parts of the Midwest and upper great plains, Dukakis was able to run really well in many non-agricultural based rural areas where there was still a strong resource based economic base.

The "Oil Patch" springs to mind in SE OK and along the Red River counties, parts of rural TX, the southern belt of Wyoming, as well as in some heavily timber dependent places in the Pacific Northwest.

Sure Jimmy Carter performed pretty well in some of these places in '76 as well, but in many ways '88 really exemplifies how Bush Senior was able to maintain solid holds in the suburbs while simultaneously massively bleeding support from Reagan in many parts of rural America.

Interestingly enough, Obama in '08 really came closest to Dukakis performance in the "Grain & Dairy belts", but getting whacked hard in energy dependent rural areas as well as many timber dependent communities.
Logged
Calthrina950
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,919
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 05, 2022, 02:19:52 AM »

The Farm Crisis certainly benefited Dukakis, and it's possible that Bush's reputation as an upper-class, educated, suburban Republican (although he had lived in Texas for forty years by the time of the election), might have hurt him with some rural voters. But the swings varied by region. Dukakis improved significantly over Mondale in Kansas, Missouri, the Dakotas, Oklahoma, Texas, Colorado, and Montana, and of course flipped Iowa and Wisconsin, along with Oregon and Washington on the West Coast. But throughout much of the South, he only marginally improved over Mondale (i.e., Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi, South Carolina, Virginia) and even did worse than him in Tennessee.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 12 queries.