Liberal Republican Presidents (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 07:07:40 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Liberal Republican Presidents (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ?
#1
McKinley
 
#2
T. Roosevelt
 
#3
Taft
 
#4
Harding
 
#5
Coolidge
 
#6
Hoover
 
#7
Eisenhower
 
#8
Nixon
 
#9
Ford
 
#10
Reagan
 
#11
GHWBush
 
#12
GW Bush
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 38

Author Topic: Liberal Republican Presidents  (Read 19359 times)
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


« on: January 25, 2004, 12:41:21 PM »

I guess TR was the most liberal *for his time*.  Nixon was the most liberal ever, though not all that liberal for his time.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


« Reply #1 on: June 01, 2004, 04:43:07 PM »

According to James Chace's new book -- "1912: Wilson, Roosevelt, Taft and Debs -- The Election That Changed the Country" -- if Teddy hadn't split the Republicans in 1912 and had actually won the election, then the whole history of American party politics in the 20th century would have been different. The Republican party would have been the party of internationalism and social reform. The Republicans, instead of the Democrats, have led the United States to the leadership of the free world in the WWII-and-after era and the Civil Rights, industrial, and economic reforms. Blacks might have stayed with the Republicans, socialists and progressives might have joined the coalition, and the racist southern white vote would not have started shifting away from the Democrats. In 2004, the Republican party might have been the party of business, labour, environmentalists, civil rights activists, pro-choice, gay rights, internationalists, etc. The Democrats might have been the party of racists, isolationists, and religious extremists. It would have been an interesting alignment.

Business and labour could not be in the same party, as their interests are diametrically opposed.  The same could be said of business and environmentalists.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 14 queries.