How Oregon would vote like if their rural areas votes like Missouri's
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 01:39:15 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  How Oregon would vote like if their rural areas votes like Missouri's
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: How Oregon would vote like if their rural areas votes like Missouri's  (Read 663 times)
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,781


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 20, 2021, 06:39:43 PM »
« edited: November 20, 2021, 06:44:39 PM by Old School Republican »

For example in Oregon using Fox's data(who did exit polls in every state):

https://www.foxnews.com/elections/2020/general-results/voter-analysis?state=OR


If Trump won rural areas and small towns in Oregon by 50 points(so 74-24), Trump would have actually won Oregon

Trump: 49.28%
Biden: 48.88%

Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,662
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 20, 2021, 10:54:06 PM »

It's a possible Dem vulnerability in the long run.  I think there's enough resorty areas in rural Oregon to keep it from getting quite that lopsided?
Logged
NOVA Green
Oregon Progressive
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,457
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 21, 2021, 02:09:12 AM »

Don't get what you are saying...

Poorly defined statement based upon a hypothetical, stacked upon other random elements, to the point that this is essentially a bunch of random drivel.

Please define and clarify your argument and what it really is that you are trying to state...

--- Confused in Oregon
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,282
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 21, 2021, 02:22:38 AM »

Sure, though rural areas in Missouri vote to the right of the country. The flip side is that if rural areas in Missouri voted like rural areas in New Hampshire, it’d be a swing state at best for Republicans and likely a Democratic-leaning state.
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,781


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 21, 2021, 02:57:39 AM »

Don't get what you are saying...

Poorly defined statement based upon a hypothetical, stacked upon other random elements, to the point that this is essentially a bunch of random drivel.

Please define and clarify your argument and what it really is that you are trying to state...

--- Confused in Oregon



Two things I’m trying to convey :


1. Why democrats can’t afford to completely ignore rural/small town America

2. A potential pathway for Oregon republicans to win gubernatorial race (get to Knute margins in the burbs + 30 in the rurals  May do it )
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,282
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 21, 2021, 11:07:42 AM »

Don't get what you are saying...

Poorly defined statement based upon a hypothetical, stacked upon other random elements, to the point that this is essentially a bunch of random drivel.

Please define and clarify your argument and what it really is that you are trying to state...

--- Confused in Oregon



Two things I’m trying to convey :


1. Why democrats can’t afford to completely ignore rural/small town America

2. A potential pathway for Oregon republicans to win gubernatorial race (get to Knute margins in the burbs + 30 in the rurals  May do it )

Since there aren’t the same number of Evangelicals in the PNW, I don’t think a Republican getting the same numbers in rural areas that they do in MO/AR is really feasible. They would need to significantly reduce urban margins, and while it’s plausible that the right kind of Republican could do that in a local race under favorable conditions, the national GOP isn’t pulling that off.

Now, it’s true that Democrats shouldn’t ignore rural areas, but Republicans can’t rely solely on rural areas, either.
Logged
At-Large Senator LouisvilleThunder
LouisvilleThunder
Atlas Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,902
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.55, S: 1.74

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 21, 2021, 01:36:23 PM »

Oregon's rurals are much less densely populated than Missouri rurals. It's much harder to develop land in Oregon for settlement due to the regulations, geography, and culture there.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 11 queries.