Don't get what you are saying...
Poorly defined statement based upon a hypothetical, stacked upon other random elements, to the point that this is essentially a bunch of random drivel.
Please define and clarify your argument and what it really is that you are trying to state...
--- Confused in Oregon
Two things I’m trying to convey :
1. Why democrats can’t afford to completely ignore rural/small town America
2. A potential pathway for Oregon republicans to win gubernatorial race (get to Knute margins in the burbs + 30 in the rurals May do it )
Since there aren’t the same number of Evangelicals in the PNW, I don’t think a Republican getting the same numbers in rural areas that they do in MO/AR is really feasible. They would need to significantly reduce urban margins, and while it’s plausible that the right kind of Republican could do that in a local race under favorable conditions, the national GOP isn’t pulling that off.
Now, it’s true that Democrats shouldn’t ignore rural areas, but Republicans can’t rely solely on rural areas, either.