Opinion of the idea of a progressive corporate tax?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 02, 2024, 11:53:32 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Opinion of the idea of a progressive corporate tax?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: What do you think of the idea of a progressive corporate tax?
#1
Freedom Idea
 
#2
Horrible Idea
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 32

Author Topic: Opinion of the idea of a progressive corporate tax?  (Read 534 times)
GregTheGreat657
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,906
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.77, S: -1.04

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 07, 2021, 06:26:27 PM »

By this, I mean that small businesses pay less in taxes than big businesses
Logged
TheReckoning
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,764
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 07, 2021, 07:36:15 PM »

Obvious freedom idea is obvious.
Logged
RINO Tom
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,026
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 08, 2021, 10:08:00 PM »

How progressive?  What is the cutoff for “small business”?  You know there are tiny entities that are corporations, right?

Given the OP’s previous “populist” opinions, I’ll assume whatever he’d support would be absolutely unproductive for the economy and therefore hurt more people than it’d help.
Logged
GregTheGreat657
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,906
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.77, S: -1.04

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 09, 2021, 06:38:34 PM »

How progressive?  What is the cutoff for “small business”?  You know there are tiny entities that are corporations, right?

Given the OP’s previous “populist” opinions, I’ll assume whatever he’d support would be absolutely unproductive for the economy and therefore hurt more people than it’d help.
Businesses with 100 or fewer employees: 10%
Businesses with over 100 employees: 30%
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,796


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 09, 2021, 07:51:50 PM »

How progressive?  What is the cutoff for “small business”?  You know there are tiny entities that are corporations, right?

Given the OP’s previous “populist” opinions, I’ll assume whatever he’d support would be absolutely unproductive for the economy and therefore hurt more people than it’d help.
Businesses with 100 or fewer employees: 10%
Businesses with over 100 employees: 30%

Wait you would have a number of employees decide what the rate should be rather than Taxable Income if you created a progressive tax structure for corporations . I’m sorry but that doesn’t really make much sense at all .

Logged
CEO Mindset
penttilinkolafan
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 925
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 09, 2021, 10:55:13 PM »

no. taxing income or consumption in any form instead of economic rents is evil, end of discussion.
Logged
AGA
Atlas Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,280
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -5.39

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 09, 2021, 11:50:14 PM »

No, that could encourage the break up of companies when it doesn't make economic sense.
Logged
Geoffrey Howe
Geoffrey Howe admirer
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,782
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 10, 2021, 12:09:48 PM »

How progressive?  What is the cutoff for “small business”?  You know there are tiny entities that are corporations, right?

Given the OP’s previous “populist” opinions, I’ll assume whatever he’d support would be absolutely unproductive for the economy and therefore hurt more people than it’d help.
Businesses with 100 or fewer employees: 10%
Businesses with over 100 employees: 30%

No possible disincentive to employ more...
Logged
President Johnson
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,935
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.70


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 12, 2021, 03:54:09 PM »

Not a bad idea in theory and I'd be open to having smaller businesses lower tax rates than larger corporations. At least in theory again. However, putting that into pratice is a much different and more difficult question. Especially where you "cut the line". A certain number of employees? Revenue? Overall value? If smaller firms pay a lower tax rates then larger ones will use all kinds of tricks to fall into a lower tax bracket. Especially those that just barely fall into a higher bracket. In the end, I believe this would only cause a bureaucratic mess and bind tons of ressources in companies and tax authorities with little to no positive effects.

Much more important is to close tax loopholes and make sure multinational corporations pay their fair share in taxes in countries they do business in.
Logged
Santander
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,929
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: 2.61


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: November 12, 2021, 05:13:29 PM »

If anything, corporate taxes should be regressive, like all taxes.

Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,196
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: November 14, 2021, 12:23:02 PM »

Unusual take for a leftist, but the corporate tax is unnecessary and inefficient. Just have a highly progressive income tax that counts capital gains as income.
Logged
parochial boy
parochial_boy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,108


Political Matrix
E: -8.38, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: November 14, 2021, 12:47:03 PM »

Unusual take for a leftist, but the corporate tax is unnecessary and inefficient. Just have a highly progressive income tax that counts capital gains as income.

I've seen that take quite a bit -  but corporate profits *theoretically* serve to inflate share price and therefore capital wealth; and, capital gains are only taxed when they are realised; and wealth inequalities are both worse (and always have been) than income inequalities - and actively decrease consumption - and second hand financial asset inflation discourages new investment. In that respect I think it is important to tax wealth before it is realised and corporate taxation is a route to that.

(yes that's a lot of ands)

Also, corporations are entities independent of their owners - and as long as they don't disburse all of their income in dividends (already taxed at a lower rate to reflect coporation tax in most jurisdictions) as soon as it is earned, I think it is fair to treat them as such as far as tax is concerned.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,196
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: November 14, 2021, 01:02:12 PM »

Unusual take for a leftist, but the corporate tax is unnecessary and inefficient. Just have a highly progressive income tax that counts capital gains as income.

I've seen that take quite a bit -  but corporate profits *theoretically* serve to inflate share price and therefore capital wealth; and, capital gains are only taxed when they are realised; and wealth inequalities are both worse (and always have been) than income inequalities - and actively decrease consumption - and second hand financial asset inflation discourages new investment. In that respect I think it is important to tax wealth before it is realised and corporate taxation is a route to that.

(yes that's a lot of ands)

Also, corporations are entities independent of their owners - and as long as they don't disburse all of their income in dividends (already taxed at a lower rate to reflect coporation tax in most jurisdictions) as soon as it is earned, I think it is fair to treat them as such as far as tax is concerned.

That's fair, and I should have mentioned that I'm also in support of a tax on excess wealth of course. That said, I still think that taxes should be levied on individuals rather than corporations. I don't think there really is a need to tax corporate profits that aren't disbursed as dividends and don't contribute to inflating the wealth of the super-rich. What that means in practice is that those profits get reinvested (which isn't really even "surplus value" as such - even employee-owned corporations will set aside some of their earnings for investment) which ultimately means they will go into 3 things: providing value for consumers, increasing wages, and of course increasing future gains for shareholders (which will be taxed as capital gains). So in the end, I do think that the combination of an income and wealth tax take care of everything.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.043 seconds with 13 queries.