FOX-VA-Tmac+5 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 02:27:24 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections
  2023 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  FOX-VA-Tmac+5 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: FOX-VA-Tmac+5  (Read 2051 times)
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,652
« on: October 14, 2021, 06:11:24 PM »

I think this matches closely with swing from the presidential race in CA to the CA Recall?
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,652
« Reply #1 on: October 14, 2021, 06:37:35 PM »

I have a question

I wasn’t really following elections in 2009

Wtf happened in VA?

In 2009 fall, Obama ratings weren’t bad. Bush was still toxic

Was there a scandal on the dem ticket?



There was no one big scandal, but it was an old school pretty elderly rural Dem who unfortunately had a speech impediment debating someone who looked and spoke like JFK and didn't say anything to scare Fairfax.
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,652
« Reply #2 on: October 15, 2021, 06:37:50 AM »

Turns out McAuliffe has a 11 or 12 point lead among registered voters so they're already assuming that turnout benefits Youngkin a lot.

So they’re making the same mistake as the California recall? Cool.

Yeah, while I don't believe McAuliffe is actually up 53-41 (which the OP conveniently left out) in RV, I do think it's interesting that pollsters appear to be making the same mistake they did in CA and creating ridiculous LV models that cycle out a ton of Democrats.

Plausible they are overcorrecting for 2020?  But it can't just be assumed.  The geography of EV turnout thus far does look more R than 2020, not necessarily by enough to win though.
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,652
« Reply #3 on: October 15, 2021, 07:02:08 AM »

Turns out McAuliffe has a 11 or 12 point lead among registered voters so they're already assuming that turnout benefits Youngkin a lot.

So they’re making the same mistake as the California recall? Cool.

Yeah, while I don't believe McAuliffe is actually up 53-41 (which the OP conveniently left out) in RV, I do think it's interesting that pollsters appear to be making the same mistake they did in CA and creating ridiculous LV models that cycle out a ton of Democrats.

Plausible they are overcorrecting for 2020?  But it can't just be assumed.  The geography of EV turnout thus far does look more R than 2020, not necessarily by enough to win though.

It's definitely possible. I also think it's possible that you have a lot of people who are not ticking off "very excited" to vote but are still going to vote nonetheless. Which may be Biden supporters, since they feel deflated a bit right now. So they may be getting bumped out of the "LV" model if it's too strict.

I don't think EV can really tell us anything though. It's just as possible that any location might be lower because that group has decided to vote election day instead of early vote.

That only makes the situation better for Republicans if it happens.  The reason the current EV data doesn't look like "enough" for statewide R's is the low turnout in the 3 rural Appalachian influenced districts.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 13 queries.