Is de-extincing animals species ethical? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 01:41:22 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Religion & Philosophy (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Is de-extincing animals species ethical? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Is de-extincing animals species ethical?  (Read 681 times)
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,426


« on: September 20, 2021, 01:09:44 AM »

There's no inherent reason why it wouldn't be, but the prudential issues with anything that's already been extinct for a while (in geological terms) strike me as enormous.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,426


« Reply #1 on: September 21, 2021, 07:07:01 PM »

It absolutely is not ethical. It's basically humanity playing God and probably making a big mistake while at it. I could see an argument for species extinct due to human activity in the recent era; but something like mamooths or dinosaurs should be a big no no.

Since humanity is made in the image of God, humanity "playing God" isn't itself morally disqualifying. Motivations, methods, proportionality, and anticipated effects on the human spirit and the natural world have to be considered. That does rule out most of what people talk about when they talk about "playing God", but it's not clear to me that it rules out cloning a few mastodons or cave bears here and there.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 12 queries.