So I thought I would take a look at Oklahoma (because personally I found the implication of OP's question a bit extreme).
In short, there are plenty of areas in Oklahoma where white voters are predominantly-Democratic (and not just in college precincts).
But to proceed, one has to decide - especially post-2020 Census - how to handle the "Native" vote. Do you:
- Assume all Natives are in fact such and actually vote considerably to the left of white voters?
- Assume most of them are culturally and demographically no different than whites and vote accordingly?
I firmly believe the correct answer is much closer to Option #2 than Option #1, but I counted conservatively and used Option #1 for support and Option #2 for turnout (i.e. "Natives" went 70-75% D while simultaneously enjoying turnout levels among whites). This means that white D support & white turnout are projected below actual performance, thereby at least slightly underestimating white D support. This gives us a bare minimum of precincts where Biden clearly won the bulk of white voters.
It's also worth noting that the precincts included are only white majority, white plurality or non-black plurality (VAP): no plurality/majority-black precincts or majority-Latino precincts are included (and I am sure there are many of these where Biden also won the white vote).
The three clusters that meet these very conservative criteria in OKC & Tulsa have a combined population of 170k people. I have virtually no doubt that precincts comprising several hundred thousand people in OK saw the bulk of white voters supporting Biden (with a good chunk of them being more obscured in predominantly black and/or Latino precincts).
Biden likely won 58-64% of the white vote in both of the OKC-area clusters; 55-60% in the Tulsa cluster.