South Carolina and Mississippi in 1928
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 01:20:14 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  South Carolina and Mississippi in 1928
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: South Carolina and Mississippi in 1928  (Read 2066 times)
RBH
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,210


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 03, 2006, 10:23:57 PM »

I know that Bilbo was working for Smith, and there was probably a united front for Smith as well, that was helpful for Al and all.

Unlike Alabama (Heflin), Texas (Tom Love and others), Georgia (W.D. Upshaw and others) and North Carolina (Simmons), I don't think there was any major breaks for Hoover in either Mississippi or South Carolina.

And Hoover failed to get 10 votes in quite a few counties in those states.

So, anybody got anything to add about the 1928 elections in those two states?
Logged
memphis
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,959


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 03, 2006, 10:34:30 PM »

Herbert Hoover had been very prominent in relief efforts during the Great Mississippi flood of 1927. The fact that he broke 15% in MS (the first Republican in 40 years to do so) was probably a result of this.
Logged
RBH
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,210


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 03, 2006, 11:39:09 PM »

Here's Hoover's results in the River counties, going from North to South

De Soto: 64 votes (4.5%)
Tunica: 26 votes (4%)
Coahoma: 223 votes (11%)
Bolivar: 266 votes (12%)
Washington: 246 votes (14%)
Issaquena: 6 votes (4%)
Warren: 530 votes (16%)
Claiborne: 43 votes (6%)
Jefferson: 61 votes (7%)
Adams: 840 votes (39%)
Wilkinson: 73 votes (9%)

The CQ results also give Smith a 1020 to 1 victory in Humphreys county.
Logged
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 04, 2006, 12:48:12 AM »

Intersesting. I wonder why Hoover did so well in Adams county.

Overall the South was pretty well screwed in this election; they had to choose between a Catholic and a Republican (and worse yet, a Catholic who favored repeal of Prohibition). I guess the Deep South considered being a Republican to be worse. Smiley
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,779


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 05, 2006, 05:10:38 AM »

I prevously raised the question why Smith got 82% in Mississippi but only 51% in Alabama, when the two usually voted alike. But most people didn't seem to get the question. Tongue Why did some Southern states swing towards Hoover while others didn't?
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,719
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 05, 2006, 05:53:44 AM »

South Carolina and Mississippi were not even close to being democratic in 1928.
Logged
jimrtex
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,817
Marshall Islands


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 05, 2006, 07:26:34 PM »

Intersesting. I wonder why Hoover did so well in Adams county.
Natchez is in Adams County.  The next two best counties include Vicksburg and Greenville.  As small cities, they may have had a small professional class, or might have served as aid distribution centers.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 11 queries.