Since 1968, did each loser come off as more elitist? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 07:03:46 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Since 1968, did each loser come off as more elitist? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Since 1968, did each loser come off as more elitist?  (Read 1374 times)
sting in the rafters
slimey56
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,495
Korea, Democratic People's Republic of


Political Matrix
E: -6.46, S: -7.30

P P P
« on: August 25, 2021, 04:53:49 PM »

All except '68 and '84. While Mondale was certainly seen as "out of touch" and Reagan made populist appeals against big government, the few regions he did well with indicate the working-class nature of the Democratic campaign.
Logged
sting in the rafters
slimey56
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,495
Korea, Democratic People's Republic of


Political Matrix
E: -6.46, S: -7.30

P P P
« Reply #1 on: August 25, 2021, 07:32:33 PM »

All except '68 and '84. While Mondale was certainly seen as "out of touch" and Reagan made populist appeals against big government, the few regions he did well with indicate the working-class nature of the Democratic campaign.





Seems like Reagan did really good with WWC outside Appalachia
He did really good period, however the few places Mondale did well (Appalachia, the Iron Range in north Minnesota, limited parts of the Midwest due to the farm crisis) were all places with a strong tradition of labor. The truly historic margins came in the suburbs.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 12 queries.