Since 1968, did each loser come off as more elitist? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 01:34:09 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Since 1968, did each loser come off as more elitist? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Since 1968, did each loser come off as more elitist?  (Read 1386 times)
Progressive Pessimist
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,144
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -7.65

« on: August 23, 2021, 06:22:49 PM »

Was Humphrey, a huge union and working class supporter, really seen as more elite than Nixon? Was it due more to racial views, if so?

Other than that, I suppose there is a connection. Though 2016 and 2020 are more difficult to classify since the definition of "elite" lost all meaning by then.
Logged
Progressive Pessimist
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,144
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -7.65

« Reply #1 on: August 25, 2021, 05:42:08 PM »

A lot of this also sounds like the claim that the more “charismatic” candidate always wins.  Such assessments are only ever formed with the value of hindsight - we backwardly project traits onto candidates to explain away their wins/losses.

That's actually a very good point.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 12 queries.