Could anyone have beaten Clinton in 1996?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 10:16:51 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  Could anyone have beaten Clinton in 1996?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Could anyone have beaten Clinton in 96?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 36

Author Topic: Could anyone have beaten Clinton in 1996?  (Read 5244 times)
Please Delete my account!!
Michael_Barkley
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 313
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 21, 2006, 03:54:17 PM »

Since this seems to be the trend on this board, I thought I would add this one.  In 1994, Clinton seemed headed to certain doom after the Republicans won control of both houses of congress for the first time in over 50 years.  But what a difference 2 years makes.

By 96, the main election was over before it started.  To his credit, Bob Dole did do better in the actual election than most polls and political analyst thought he would.  But still, Dole entered the presidential election with way too much against him.  His age, a poorly run campaign, and the fact that he didn't have the persona that Clinton did.  I think it's a shame because Bob Dole would have made a good president.   But he didn't stand a chance.

So is there any Republican that cuold have beaten Clinton in 96?  Forbes?  Buchanan?  Anybody?
Logged
kashifsakhan
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 525
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 21, 2006, 04:53:14 PM »

No. I think Clinton could beat any Republican on his charisma alone. I dont think there was any Republican back then, or even now, that could beat an incumbent Clinton.
Logged
dazzleman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,777
Political Matrix
E: 1.88, S: 1.59

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 21, 2006, 08:38:02 PM »

Maybe Colin Powell.  He's the only person I can think of.  He was the only potential opponent that Clinton feared.
Logged
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 22, 2006, 12:23:47 AM »

Possibly Powell; the election would've been close.

I have to think Clinton would've had a decent shot at sweeping the South if Powell had been the Republican nominee, however. Either that or someone like Buchanan might well have run as a third party candidate.

Other than Colin Powell, though, I don't think any Republican could've won that race. Alexander actually might've been the strongest nominee among the candidates who ran; he probably at least would've won KY and TN, but probably not anything else that Dole lost.
Logged
Dr. Cynic
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,450
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.11, S: -6.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: September 22, 2006, 01:09:27 PM »

I have to agree with Nym. Powell would have a decent shot at Clinton in 1996, and it would have made me really conflicted, and glad that I was only 8 going on 9 years at the time.
Logged
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: September 24, 2006, 01:31:13 PM »

I have to agree with Nym. Powell would have a decent shot at Clinton in 1996, and it would have made me really conflicted, and glad that I was only 8 going on 9 years at the time.

I think we would've seen a map similar to 1976, actually. Clinton would probably win most of the South as they'd prefer a white moderate Democrat from the South over a northern black moderate Republican (sad but true), especially one who was and is pretty liberal on social issues.
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,653
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: September 24, 2006, 01:45:23 PM »

No, I don't think so. Maybe Powell would have had a shot but it still would have been dead close.
Logged
TomC
TCash101
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,976


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: September 24, 2006, 02:49:26 PM »

Kemp would have been better than Dole and been more competetive in the NE and the rust belt. Clinton still probably would have won though.
Logged
Reignman
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,236


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -3.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 01, 2006, 05:48:06 PM »

Nope.
Logged
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 01, 2006, 08:30:04 PM »

powell and alexander are the only two that would have even had a chance.
Logged
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,577
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 01, 2006, 08:41:33 PM »

I concur with others that Colin Powell could have been the only Republican who even remotely had a chance of defeating President Clinton -that said, he would have been torn to pieces in the primaries for being too moderate, so the point is moot. 
Logged
gorkay
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 995


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: November 09, 2006, 04:44:59 PM »

Clinton and his people thought Alexander was his strongest potential opponent. But I don't think Alexander would have beaten him. Powell may have had a chance, but I doubt he would have won either. His political inexperience would have been a liability that Clinton would have taken full advantage of.
Logged
Stranger in a strange land
strangeland
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,174
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: November 13, 2006, 12:27:24 PM »

Powell had a chance, but it would have been close.
Logged
merseysider
militant centrist
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 524


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: November 22, 2006, 06:44:14 PM »

I think the GOP would have had a good chance of ousting Clinton in 96 had they not won control of Congress in 94 - I was looking at some Clinton 96 ads and they all seemed to consist of attacks on Newt Gingrich and the Republican Congress.

I think if they had got someone with Bob Dole's politics but who was a bit younger, that someone could have won.
Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: November 22, 2006, 07:03:03 PM »

Lamar Alexander/Colin Powell (R) 274
Bill Clinton/Albert Gore Jr. (D) 264

Logged
Conan
conan
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,140


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: November 22, 2006, 09:29:19 PM »

Lamar Alexander/Colin Powell (R) 274
Bill Clinton/Albert Gore Jr. (D) 264


You're such a hack
Logged
Colin
ColinW
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,684
Papua New Guinea


Political Matrix
E: 3.87, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: November 22, 2006, 10:12:08 PM »

Lamar Alexander/Colin Powell (R) 274
Bill Clinton/Albert Gore Jr. (D) 264


You're such a hack

Pot, meet kettle.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.04 seconds with 13 queries.