California v. Texas: ACA upheld due to lack of standing
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 02:28:34 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  California v. Texas: ACA upheld due to lack of standing
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: California v. Texas: ACA upheld due to lack of standing  (Read 526 times)
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY
Alfred F. Jones
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,124
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: June 17, 2021, 09:08:09 AM »

7-2 ruling with Alito and Gorsuch dissenting. Breyer opinion.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/19-840_6jfm.pdf
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: June 17, 2021, 09:09:25 AM »

What a lovely note on which to retire.
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,652
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: June 17, 2021, 10:00:14 AM »

Told you Barrett wasn't a down-the-line partisan!

But between this and joining in the pro-severability ruling just last term in Seila Law, Alito proves that he is.  I still can't believe they got Thomas for this, though.
Logged
Geoffrey Howe
Geoffrey Howe admirer
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,782
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: June 17, 2021, 12:02:54 PM »

I wonder whether they bent over backwards to uphold the statute (or, rather, not strike it down) in order to stave off court-packing attempts.
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,652
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: June 17, 2021, 01:20:39 PM »

I wonder whether they bent over backwards to uphold the statute (or, rather, not strike it down) in order to stave off court-packing attempts.

IDK that would be more plausible if it was 5/4 or 6/3 with a narrow Barrett/Kav concurrence.  I can only conclude they have truly had enough of these weirder and weirder Obamacare challenges.  You don't get Thomas voting to dismiss this case based on fears of court packing.   
Logged
brucejoel99
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,720
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: June 17, 2021, 04:06:18 PM »

Logged
brucejoel99
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,720
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: June 17, 2021, 07:09:29 PM »

Told you Barrett wasn't a down-the-line partisan!

But between this and joining in the pro-severability ruling just last term in Seila Law, Alito proves that he is.  I still can't believe they got Thomas for this, though.

I wonder whether they bent over backwards to uphold the statute (or, rather, not strike it down) in order to stave off court-packing attempts.

IDK that would be more plausible if it was 5/4 or 6/3 with a narrow Barrett/Kav concurrence.  I can only conclude they have truly had enough of these weirder and weirder Obamacare challenges.  You don't get Thomas voting to dismiss this case based on fears of court packing.   

To be fair to Thomas, this ruling appears to be pretty consistent with his jurisprudence on standing.
Logged
MATTROSE94
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,791
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -5.29, S: -6.43

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: June 17, 2021, 07:37:31 PM »

Told you Barrett wasn't a down-the-line partisan!

But between this and joining in the pro-severability ruling just last term in Seila Law, Alito proves that he is.  I still can't believe they got Thomas for this, though.
Amy Coney Barrett has been much better than I thought. The only rulings I really disagree with her on are the ones regarding COVID restrictions.
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,652
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: June 18, 2021, 02:59:15 PM »

Told you Barrett wasn't a down-the-line partisan!

But between this and joining in the pro-severability ruling just last term in Seila Law, Alito proves that he is.  I still can't believe they got Thomas for this, though.
Amy Coney Barrett has been much better than I thought. The only rulings I really disagree with her on are the ones regarding COVID restrictions.

Even there, she was in the moderate camp that partially upheld the CA restrictions (singing). 

A "you can't go to church for a year" order should be presumptively unconstitutional.  The state should have the burden of showing that something on the scale of WWIII or Black Death 2.0 is happening.  It's very different from "you can't go to church for 2 weeks until we know what the heck is going on."
Logged
Kahane's Grave Is A Gender-Neutral Bathroom
theflyingmongoose
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,318
Norway


Political Matrix
E: 3.41, S: -1.29

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: June 29, 2021, 06:21:02 PM »

Man, Trump's conservative court is working bigly.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.039 seconds with 11 queries.