which president was more liberal
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 09:28:52 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  which president was more liberal
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: .....
#1
nixon
 
#2
clinton
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 29

Author Topic: which president was more liberal  (Read 3630 times)
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 31, 2006, 09:10:36 PM »

discuss.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,724
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 01, 2006, 07:30:09 AM »

In terms of policies or general viewpoints? (Nixon on the first, Bubba on the second).
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 01, 2006, 12:25:02 PM »

In terms of policies or general viewpoints? (Nixon on the first, Bubba on the second).

^^^^
Logged
Rob
Bob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,277
United States
Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -9.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 01, 2006, 03:45:15 PM »

Nixon was a conservative who governed as a liberal. Clinton was a liberal who governed as a conservative. Frankly, I'll take the former any day of the week.
Logged
Michael Z
Mike
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,288
Political Matrix
E: -5.88, S: -4.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: September 03, 2006, 04:49:29 AM »

Clinton governed as a conservative partly because the Senate didn't give him much of a choice after the 1994 elections. Remember his plans to nationalise health care?
Logged
kashifsakhan
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 525
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: September 05, 2006, 04:43:25 PM »

Clinton governed as a conservative partly because the Senate didn't give him much of a choice after the 1994 elections. Remember his plans to nationalise health care?

Thats true. He never really got to do much because the last 6 years of his presidency was just a train of scandals.
Logged
kashifsakhan
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 525
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: September 07, 2006, 02:24:08 PM »

forgot to vote.... Clinton definitely.
Logged
Michael Z
Mike
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,288
Political Matrix
E: -5.88, S: -4.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: September 08, 2006, 06:06:59 AM »

Clinton governed as a conservative partly because the Senate didn't give him much of a choice after the 1994 elections. Remember his plans to nationalise health care?

Thats true. He never really got to do much because the last 6 years of his presidency was just a train of scandals.

Yeah, plus the Republicans controlled the Senate after '94.
Logged
Rob
Bob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,277
United States
Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -9.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: September 08, 2006, 06:20:39 AM »

Clinton governed as a conservative partly because the Senate didn't give him much of a choice after the 1994 elections. Remember his plans to nationalise health care?

Yes, but after that he swung far to the right and embraced the congressional GOP agenda, albeit without some of their nuttier ideas.

I'm mildly amazed that he couldn't even break 50 percent in 1996. That should have been a resounding victory on the level of 1956, even with Perot in the race.
Logged
kashifsakhan
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 525
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: September 08, 2006, 05:56:15 PM »

Clinton governed as a conservative partly because the Senate didn't give him much of a choice after the 1994 elections. Remember his plans to nationalise health care?

Yes, but after that he swung far to the right and embraced the congressional GOP agenda, albeit without some of their nuttier ideas.

I'm mildly amazed that he couldn't even break 50 percent in 1996. That should have been a resounding victory on the level of 1956, even with Perot in the race.

I think the reason for him not breaking 50% in 1996 was due to the scandals, plus the fact that due to the GOP controlled congress, he didnt manage to get alot done.
Logged
True Democrat
true democrat
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,368
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.10, S: -2.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: September 09, 2006, 01:36:56 PM »

Clinton governed as a conservative partly because the Senate didn't give him much of a choice after the 1994 elections. Remember his plans to nationalise health care?

Yes, but after that he swung far to the right and embraced the congressional GOP agenda, albeit without some of their nuttier ideas.

I'm mildly amazed that he couldn't even break 50 percent in 1996. That should have been a resounding victory on the level of 1956, even with Perot in the race.

I think the reason for him not breaking 50% in 1996 was due to the scandals, plus the fact that due to the GOP controlled congress, he didnt manage to get alot done.

Turnout was a big issue.  Everyone knew Clinton was going to win, so nobody turned out to vote.
Logged
kashifsakhan
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 525
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: September 09, 2006, 08:44:41 PM »

Clinton governed as a conservative partly because the Senate didn't give him much of a choice after the 1994 elections. Remember his plans to nationalise health care?

Yes, but after that he swung far to the right and embraced the congressional GOP agenda, albeit without some of their nuttier ideas.

I'm mildly amazed that he couldn't even break 50 percent in 1996. That should have been a resounding victory on the level of 1956, even with Perot in the race.

I think the reason for him not breaking 50% in 1996 was due to the scandals, plus the fact that due to the GOP controlled congress, he didnt manage to get alot done.

Turnout was a big issue.  Everyone knew Clinton was going to win, so nobody turned out to vote.

Thats true.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: September 10, 2006, 03:04:03 AM »

definitely clinton.
Logged
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: September 11, 2006, 09:40:18 PM »
« Edited: September 11, 2006, 09:43:31 PM by Nym90 »

Nixon was a conservative who governed as a liberal. Clinton was a liberal who governed as a conservative. Frankly, I'll take the former any day of the week.

Maybe, but you have to consider Nixon's attitude that he was totally above the law and that the executive branch should basically be able to do whatever it wants. That in and of itself makes him far worse than Clinton overall, even though Nixon's policies themselves weren't really that bad.

Both Presidents largely or in the case of Nixon completely faced Congresses controlled by the opposite party, so that made both of them more moderate than they likely would've been if their own party had complete control. Both had to be pragmatic and compromise in order to get anything accomplished.
Logged
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: September 11, 2006, 09:42:15 PM »

Clinton governed as a conservative partly because the Senate didn't give him much of a choice after the 1994 elections. Remember his plans to nationalise health care?

Yes, but after that he swung far to the right and embraced the congressional GOP agenda, albeit without some of their nuttier ideas.

I'm mildly amazed that he couldn't even break 50 percent in 1996. That should have been a resounding victory on the level of 1956, even with Perot in the race.

I would hardly say he "embraced" the GOP agenda. He vetoed quite a lot of legislation, but he did show quite a willingness to compromise which was pretty much a political necessity and reality in that environment.
Logged
DWPerry
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,674
Puerto Rico


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: September 12, 2006, 01:38:01 AM »

Clinton governed as a conservative partly because the Senate didn't give him much of a choice after the 1994 elections. Remember his plans to nationalise health care?

Yes, but after that he swung far to the right and embraced the congressional GOP agenda, albeit without some of their nuttier ideas.

I'm mildly amazed that he couldn't even break 50 percent in 1996. That should have been a resounding victory on the level of 1956, even with Perot in the race.

I think the reason for him not breaking 50% in 1996 was due to the scandals, plus the fact that due to the GOP controlled congress, he didnt manage to get alot done.

The last Dem to crack 50% was Carter in 1976, before that, LBJ in'64; then you must go back to FDR for consecutive 50+% for a Dem.
Logged
MarkWarner08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,812


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: September 16, 2006, 06:08:40 PM »

Nixon. He oversaw the passage of major envrionmental reforms and he appointed relatively moderate justices.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.045 seconds with 13 queries.