Unicameralism Plan: Term length for At-Large Seats?

[Sestak]

I will note that the poll is nonbinding - mostly just there to provide a rough benchmark. I would rather see what people have to say on this and the arguments presented - a final decision is more likely to hinge on that.

[S019]

I prefer 4, but that's because I like longer terms in general (I believe they allow for more to be done during each session) other people may not share this view. I'm fine with either in the end, though.

[Dr. MB]

2 months. 4 is a bad idea.

[Esteemed Jimmy]

2 months

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

I am open to 4 being considered on its own merits, but I think for the sake of the plan the best approach is minimizing changes contained within itself. Certainly the case for 4 even under bicameralism could well be made and from my experience with the house in 2017-2018, I did find the constant reelection cycle somewhat annoying, but I prefer that to be considered separately either after or before the plan is adopted.

[OBD]

4 months for the regional at-large seats, 2 months for the 9 nationally elected seats (not sure which is being asked here lol)

[Sestak]

4 months for the regional at-large seats, 2 months for the 9 nationally elected seats (not sure which is being asked here lol)

Question is about the at-large (national) seats. Regional seats will be 4 mos.

[OBD]

4 months for the regional at-large seats, 2 months for the 9 nationally elected seats (not sure which is being asked here lol)

Question is about the at-large (national) seats. Regional seats will be 4 mos.

Ah okay. That changes my vote then so subtract one from the 4 month option.

[West_Midlander]

2 months, preferably. I voted for four in the poll accidentally.

[Deep Dixieland Senator, Muad'dib (OSR MSR)]

Unicameralism is cancer