Yesterday, Tekken_Guy made this thread about a WI map he made
https://talkelections.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=436717.msg8019051#msg8019051I thought the map he made was interesting and I asked what the site was. An Existential Void Where A Uterus Should Be directed me to the site Tekken_Guy was using.
https://elections-daily.com/the-election-shuffler/ (Side note, I think I might've already become addicted, so thank you An Existential Void Where A Uterus Should Be)
On the thread, MT Treasurer said he played around with CO and tried to make the state close but he said that even changing some safe D Native/Hispanic counties to safe R and making Adams, Jefferson and Arapahoe single-digit D wins couldn't even make the state competitive.
I was inspired by him to see if I could produce a GOP winning map without any of Larimer, Jefferson, Adams or Arapahoe.
I changed margins in 26 counties and didn't change turnout in anything.
Here was what I was able to achieve.
Denver: D+47
Boulder: D+43
Larimer: D+1
Jefferson: D+4
Adams: D+5
Arapahoe: D+8
Broomfield: D+14
Clear Creek: D+7
La Plata: D+5
Costilla: D+12
San Miguel: D+37
Gunnison: D+16
Garfield: R+10
Grand: R+12
Gilpin: R+1
Saguache: R+2
Pueblo: R+10
Alamosa: R+12
Las Animas: R+21
Conejos: R+18
Huerfano: R+14
Chaffee: R+9
Weld: R+30
Douglas: R+27
El Paso: R+34
Mesa: R+39
Statewide: R+0.16 (5,099 votes)
Yep, I was able to do it.
Though the fact that I made some big shifts and the GOP still only ekes out a victory of just 5,099 votes shows how hard the state really is for the GOP right now.