County maps for interesting candidates
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 10:37:33 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  County maps for interesting candidates
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6
Author Topic: County maps for interesting candidates  (Read 38834 times)
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,727
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 03, 2006, 03:21:04 PM »

I've been meaning to do some of these for a while; basically national (or regional in certain cases) maps of, well, interesting candidates.

Did Anderson first:



The forum currently re-sizes images, so copy the image to something like Paint to see a bigger, clearer picture.

Comments?
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,083
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 03, 2006, 03:28:54 PM »

Hmm, that is interesting.  I can understand his heavy support in northern IL and New England, and lack thereof right across the South, but why did he seem to do so well in CO as well?  It's not just Denver either.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,727
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 03, 2006, 03:44:58 PM »

Hmm, that is interesting.  I can understand his heavy support in northern IL and New England, and lack thereof right across the South, but why did he seem to do so well in CO as well?  It's not just Denver either.

Ski-resorts and all that I think; he took 20.8% in Pitkin (which includes Aspen) for example.
Logged
Rob
Bob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,277
United States
Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -9.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 03, 2006, 06:41:47 PM »

Very nice! His areas of strength are the same places that Nader ran well in 2000.

I would really like a LaFollette map for 1924, if at all possible. Smiley
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,727
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 03, 2006, 06:54:47 PM »

His areas of strength are the same places that Nader ran well in 2000.

In general yes (college towns and resorts... basically...), but there are some interesting exceptions here and there.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Sure Smiley
Logged
Rob
Bob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,277
United States
Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -9.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 03, 2006, 07:06:32 PM »

Awesome! Cheesy
Logged
Colin
ColinW
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,684
Papua New Guinea


Political Matrix
E: 3.87, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: August 03, 2006, 07:24:32 PM »

Got any others for us? Great work as always Al very interesting.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,727
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: August 03, 2006, 07:34:31 PM »

Just a small one now;



Schmitz (who was pretty much an out-and-out fascist) also polled well in parts of Louisiana and fairly well (ie; 4%) in a couple of counties in Southern California and Tennessee.
Logged
Rob
Bob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,277
United States
Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -9.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: August 03, 2006, 07:38:18 PM »

Schmitz ran ahead of McGovern in four Idaho counties, didn't he?

That's pretty damn scary.
Logged
Colin
ColinW
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,684
Papua New Guinea


Political Matrix
E: 3.87, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: August 03, 2006, 08:14:35 PM »

Did well with the Mormons in Idaho didn't he?
Logged
WMS
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,557


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: August 04, 2006, 04:24:34 PM »

Los Alamos and Santa Fe Counties were Anderson's top two, eh? Err, let's see...I suppose Anderson won the left-libertarian vote. Smiley
Logged
jimrtex
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,817
Marshall Islands


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: August 04, 2006, 07:57:15 PM »
« Edited: August 04, 2006, 08:38:21 PM by jimrtex »

The forum currently re-sizes images, so copy the image to something like Paint to see a bigger, clearer picture.
You can do it is as an url.

Click for full size picture.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Interesting college town vote, including places like Norman, Stillwater, Columbia, Carbondale, Raleigh-Durham, Lawrence, Manhattan, Lincoln, Laramie, Champaign-Urbana, Lafayette, Bloomington, Tallahassee, Morgantown, Madison, Lexington, Austin, Knoxville, Ames, Iowa City, Boulder, Lansing, Ann Arbor, State College.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,727
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: August 04, 2006, 08:08:50 PM »


I could do... but that would be logical Smiley
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: August 05, 2006, 04:34:11 AM »


Schmitz (who was pretty much an out-and-out fascist)

And we all know what happened to John Schmitz' daughter, don't we? Smiley
Logged
jimrtex
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,817
Marshall Islands


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: August 05, 2006, 11:10:16 AM »


Schmitz (who was pretty much an out-and-out fascist)

And we all know what happened to John Schmitz' daughter, don't we? Smiley
I had an internet acquaintance who was living in Germany, and was concerned about coming back to the United State, because he had for some reason registered as an American Independent, and thought it might be some sort of socialist party.  Shortly thereafter I was reading about Schmitz's daughter.

I was thinking of telling him, that the good news was that the immigration people wouldn't think he was a commie...
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,727
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: August 05, 2006, 04:20:55 PM »



Don't have county-level stuff for six states, but the overall picture is pretty clear anyway.
Some very interesting patterns here and there.

Bigger picture here
Logged
jerusalemcar5
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,731
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -4.26, S: -8.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: August 05, 2006, 08:19:37 PM »

Hey can you do Barry Commoner in 1980 Smiley.
Logged
jimrtex
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,817
Marshall Islands


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: August 05, 2006, 08:49:17 PM »

Don't have county-level stuff for six states, but the overall picture is pretty clear anyway.


74.0% in Comal County, 58.5% in Gillespie.  Lots of missing data.  I suspect that El Paso was over 10%, it was almost 50:50 in 1920 and 1928.

Big State
Logged
Rob
Bob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,277
United States
Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -9.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: August 05, 2006, 08:56:41 PM »

Very cool. Thanks for the LaFollette data. Smiley

He took all the Republican progressive vote, even carrying two anti-slavery German counties in Texas.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,727
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: August 06, 2006, 10:03:13 AM »

Thanks Jim Smiley

He took all the Republican progressive vote, even carrying two anti-slavery German counties in Texas.

What's interesting about that, is that in traditionally Democratic areas where other lefties had run well in in the past, he did quite badly; Little Dixie certainly didn't warm to him for one thing.

He also did pretty well in most mining areas; which isn't really suprising. Can't explain that one county in South Carolina though. Any guesses?
Logged
Rob
Bob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,277
United States
Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -9.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: August 06, 2006, 10:20:04 AM »

No idea. It reminds me of the Debs vote in a few northern Louisiana parishes in 1912- he broke 30 percent in one or two iirc. I'm assuming that these places were dirt-poor, but how did the people become organized to vote Socialist, in this one election?
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,727
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: August 06, 2006, 06:44:13 PM »

No idea. It reminds me of the Debs vote in a few northern Louisiana parishes in 1912- he broke 30 percent in one or two iirc.

One of them was Winn parish.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

No idea. That it happend in a South Carolina county is especially odd, bearing in mind the restrictions on the franchise and poor turnouts.
Not sure what the county was like in 1924, but it's quite industrial these days IIRC.
Logged
jimrtex
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,817
Marshall Islands


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: August 07, 2006, 02:57:41 AM »

It's interesting that even the lower levels (5% and 10%) picked up areas where there had been significant immigration (from both Europe and the midwest) such as in the Panhandle and South Plains and along the Red River, and the Czech and German areas between Houston and San Antonio.

A hugely extreme difference between Comal and Hays counties, but that has been consistent:

1876: Hays 504:165 Tilden; Comal 176:260 Hayes.
1896: Hays 1813:692 Bryan;  Comal 268:1023 McKinley.
1916: Hays 995:123 Wilson;  Comal 432:743 Hughes.
1940: Hays 2239:555 FDR;  Comal 852:1851 Wilkie.
1972: Hays 4068:5406 Nixon;  Comal 1823:6761 Nixon.
1988: Hays 11187:11716 Bush; Comal 5716:13994 Bush.
2004: Hays 27021:20110 Bush; Comal 31574:9153 Bush.

They're becoming similar.  2004 was down to 20% different.  1896, 1916, and 1940 were around 50%.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,727
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: August 07, 2006, 07:44:53 PM »

Perot in 1992 now:



bigger picture is here

Some very odd patterns there...
Logged
WMS
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,557


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: August 11, 2006, 04:38:39 PM »

Communitarian-land didn't seem to like Perot all that much. Wink
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.045 seconds with 11 queries.