TX-06: Dems in Disarray!
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 20, 2024, 11:36:05 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  TX-06: Dems in Disarray!
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16
Author Topic: TX-06: Dems in Disarray!  (Read 24316 times)
Devils30
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.06, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #250 on: May 01, 2021, 11:24:17 PM »

https://ballotpedia.org/Texas%27_6th_Congressional_District

Only 27% with college degree here. I thought it was better but GA-6 is 56% and GA-7 37%. Not to mention this one doesn’t have the black voters that those two have. Dems need to at least contest places like this even if it’s a likely loss at this stage.
Logged
EastwoodS
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,905


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #251 on: May 01, 2021, 11:28:55 PM »

Wright is going to the runoff, no question about it. But Sanchez is actually closing the gap from the 2-3 points earlier. It is now less than 400 votes.

Hopefully she can still make the runoff.

There are only 9 precincts from Tarrant left.

It’s over.

It’s going to be a 2xR runoff.

Tarrant favors Sanchez over Ellzey though.
All of Tarrant now in, Ellezey defeats Sanchez by 354 votes apparently. Provisionals not included.
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,319
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #252 on: May 01, 2021, 11:30:23 PM »

Wright is going to the runoff, no question about it. But Sanchez is actually closing the gap from the 2-3 points earlier. It is now less than 400 votes.

Hopefully she can still make the runoff.

There are only 9 precincts from Tarrant left.

It’s over.

It’s going to be a 2xR runoff.

Tarrant favors Sanchez over Ellzey though.
All of Tarrant now in, Ellezey defeats Sanchez by 354 votes apparently. Provisionals not included.
How are provisionals likely to go?
Logged
EastwoodS
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,905


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #253 on: May 01, 2021, 11:30:57 PM »

Wright is going to the runoff, no question about it. But Sanchez is actually closing the gap from the 2-3 points earlier. It is now less than 400 votes.

Hopefully she can still make the runoff.

There are only 9 precincts from Tarrant left.

It’s over.

It’s going to be a 2xR runoff.

Tarrant favors Sanchez over Ellzey though.
All of Tarrant now in, Ellezey defeats Sanchez by 354 votes apparently. Provisionals not included.
How are provisionals likely to go?
No clue, tbh. But I doubt there’s enough to overcome a 354 vote lead.
Logged
Roll Roons
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,147
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #254 on: May 01, 2021, 11:37:32 PM »

So what's the rating for a Wright vs. Ellzey runoff?
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,204
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #255 on: May 01, 2021, 11:38:25 PM »

Dems miss the runoff by 354 votes !!!

100% counted.

https://results.texas-election.com

How STUPID are they ?
Logged
Kahane's Grave Is A Gender-Neutral Bathroom
theflyingmongoose
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,371
Norway


Political Matrix
E: 3.41, S: -1.29

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #256 on: May 01, 2021, 11:39:36 PM »

I still think that Wood could pull this off.

(Sorry, it is the moderate republican part of my brain)


The Washington Post says that tarrant is only 90.5% in.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,204
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #257 on: May 01, 2021, 11:40:41 PM »

I still think that Wood could pull this off.

(Sorry, it is the moderate republican part of my brain)


The Washington Post says that tarrant is only 90.5% in.


They have not updated.

The TX SoS page has 100% in already.
Logged
EastwoodS
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,905


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #258 on: May 01, 2021, 11:41:23 PM »

I still think that Wood could pull this off.

(Sorry, it is the moderate republican part of my brain)


The Washington Post says that tarrant is only 90.5% in.


They have not updated.

The TX SoS page has 100% in already.
Lmao, he is being sarcastic
Logged
Non Swing Voter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,169


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #259 on: May 02, 2021, 12:05:53 AM »

Wow a lot of the high profile candidates like Rodimer, Wood, and Kim had really awful showings. 

What's Rodimer's next move?  Alaska to primary Murkowski? 
Logged
Matty
boshembechle
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,098


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #260 on: May 02, 2021, 12:07:37 AM »

Interesting note:

tarramt county turnout was lower than both ellis and navarro county

interesting because tarrant is where all the high propensity suburban voters live

Logged
Stuart98
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,791
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.35, S: -5.83

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #261 on: May 02, 2021, 12:11:54 AM »

Ellzey had a lot more funding than Wright did (especially with outside groups taken into account), so he probably had a much more robust turnout game in his base.
Logged
DINGO Joe
dingojoe
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,689
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #262 on: May 02, 2021, 12:12:30 AM »

Is Sanchez done, or can she still squeak into the runoff?

It would require a minor miracle from the remaining vote in Tarrant.

Not really sure why the Dems ran several candidates capable of getting more than 5% here. Should have coalesced around one and forced others out/to states of non-campaigning. Then you can get someone to 30% and basically guarantee they advance.

While I didn't follow this much, it doesn't seem like any candidate did anything worthy of "coalescing" and given the demographics of the district  it would take an exceptional candidate to generate enough interest to make the runoff competitive.  Obviously, none of these could do it.  Of course, the Rs were mediocre too.
Logged
Vosem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,641
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.13, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #263 on: May 02, 2021, 12:24:03 AM »
« Edited: May 02, 2021, 12:33:43 AM by Vosem »

With 100% in Ellzey leads Sanchez by 354 votes for the second slot. Wright called as the winner of the first slot, no call for the second slot.

District-wide partisan total: Republicans 62.1, Democrats 37.1, ind (Mizher) 0.4, Libertarian 0.3

There are reasons to take this number with a grain of salt -- the local majority party always over-performs open jungle primaries, Democrats are notoriously sh**t at Texas special elections, the Republican candidates put in way more effort here, incumbents usually get a sympathy boost in a special election caused by a death, turnout was low -- but even considering all that, R+25 in a Trump+3 seat is way better for the GOP than any polling here or anywhere else suggested, and for them to out-perform Romney in this left-trending seat is astounding. (This was Romney '12 58-41, Trump '16 54-42, Trump '20 51-48. Abbott '18 56-42, Abbott '14 58-40...). Balls-to-the-wall performance.

EDIT: The "Obama Second Term, Second Time" vibes are really strong with this outcome.
Logged
Benjamin Frank
Frank
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,066


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #264 on: May 02, 2021, 01:01:55 AM »
« Edited: May 02, 2021, 01:16:48 AM by Frank »

Wow a lot of the high profile candidates like Rodimer, Wood, and Kim had really awful showings.  

What's Rodimer's next move?  Alaska to primary Murkowski?  

More evidence that the media tends to focus on the sensational - the more interesting/controversial candidates, as much as if not more than the actual frontrunners.
Logged
beesley
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,151
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -4.52, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #265 on: May 02, 2021, 01:09:32 AM »

Wood is beating Rodimer, which we can all be happy about.
Logged
Kahane's Grave Is A Gender-Neutral Bathroom
theflyingmongoose
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,371
Norway


Political Matrix
E: 3.41, S: -1.29

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #266 on: May 02, 2021, 01:42:27 AM »

Wow a lot of the high profile candidates like Rodimer, Wood, and Kim had really awful showings.  

What's Rodimer's next move?  Alaska to primary Murkowski?  

More evidence that the media tends to focus on the sensational - the more interesting/controversial candidates, as much as if not more than the actual frontrunners.

It seems my $100 on Wood was wasted.
Logged
Intell
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,812
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -1.24

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #267 on: May 02, 2021, 01:56:32 AM »

Interesting note:

tarramt county turnout was lower than both ellis and navarro county

interesting because tarrant is where all the high propensity suburban voters live



Tarrant is much more working class and minority heavy than people think, especially the Tarrant portion of TX-06.
Logged
LtNOWIS
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 520


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #268 on: May 02, 2021, 02:09:10 AM »

Wow a lot of the high profile candidates like Rodimer, Wood, and Kim had really awful showings.  

What's Rodimer's next move?  Alaska to primary Murkowski?  

More evidence that the media tends to focus on the sensational - the more interesting/controversial candidates, as much as if not more than the actual frontrunners.

It seems my $100 on Wood was wasted.
I would've given him money if I remembered, but it's probably better I didn't.

I suppose it's good to see Trump's chosen candidate Susan Wright get an embarrassingly low portion of the vote, right? As an anti-Trumper, should I should be rooting for this guy Ellzey as the slightly better option?
Logged
Bootes Void
iamaganster123
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,677
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #269 on: May 02, 2021, 02:10:57 AM »

So far all special elections have been R vs R or D vs D. Interesting.
Logged
Horus
Sheliak5
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,113
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #270 on: May 02, 2021, 02:12:19 AM »

Wow a lot of the high profile candidates like Rodimer, Wood, and Kim had really awful showings.  

What's Rodimer's next move?  Alaska to primary Murkowski?  

More evidence that the media tends to focus on the sensational - the more interesting/controversial candidates, as much as if not more than the actual frontrunners.

It seems my $100 on Wood was wasted.
I would've given him money if I remembered, but it's probably better I didn't.

I suppose it's good to see Trump's chosen candidate Susan Wright get an embarrassingly low portion of the vote, right? As an anti-Trumper, should I should be rooting for this guy Ellzey as the slightly better option?

Trump doesn't always endorse the worst candidate. He endorsed the admittedly awful but not a sex predator Mo Brooks over Roy Moore in the AL-Senate special and also went with Madison Cawthorn's opponent.
Logged
beesley
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,151
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -4.52, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #271 on: May 02, 2021, 02:37:37 AM »

Wow a lot of the high profile candidates like Rodimer, Wood, and Kim had really awful showings.  

What's Rodimer's next move?  Alaska to primary Murkowski?  

More evidence that the media tends to focus on the sensational - the more interesting/controversial candidates, as much as if not more than the actual frontrunners.

It seems my $100 on Wood was wasted.
I would've given him money if I remembered, but it's probably better I didn't.

I suppose it's good to see Trump's chosen candidate Susan Wright get an embarrassingly low portion of the vote, right? As an anti-Trumper, should I should be rooting for this guy Ellzey as the slightly better option?

Trump doesn't always endorse the worst candidate. He endorsed the admittedly awful but not a sex predator Mo Brooks over Roy Moore in the AL-Senate special and also went with Madison Cawthorn's opponent.

He pays far less attention than you think and often endorses who his advisers or Kevin McCarthy tell him to. He also tends not to endorse candidates he doesn't think will win with his endorsement.
Logged
It’s so Joever
Forumlurker161
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,072


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #272 on: May 02, 2021, 02:47:35 AM »

After today, the only question now is whether Democrats lose 20 or 50 seats.
Logged
Woody
SirWoodbury
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,245


Political Matrix
E: 1.48, S: 1.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #273 on: May 02, 2021, 03:22:12 AM »

?
Logged
beesley
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,151
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -4.52, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #274 on: May 02, 2021, 03:30:30 AM »

Nothing of value
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.07 seconds with 12 queries.