Hilariously wrong predictions
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 05:33:43 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results
  2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Hilariously wrong predictions
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: Hilariously wrong predictions  (Read 23519 times)
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,743


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: June 22, 2006, 04:46:17 AM »
« edited: June 22, 2006, 04:48:45 AM by jfern »

I say RealClearPolitics gets the award for terrible predictions. From Monday November 6th, 2000:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.




http://web.archive.org/web/20001216085300/http://www.realclearpolitics.com/Polls/polls-Electoral_11_06_EC.html

RealClearPolitics = total joke.


Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: June 22, 2006, 09:14:48 AM »

I say RealClearPolitics gets the award for terrible predictions. From Monday November 6th, 2000:


Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.



http://web.archive.org/web/20001216085300/http://www.realclearpolitics.com/Polls/polls-Electoral_11_06_EC.html

RealClearPolitics = total joke.




First, you link doesn't work.  Second, the premise that a 2-3% win in the popular vote translates into a 397 EV total is usually correct.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,743


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: June 22, 2006, 02:03:53 PM »

I say RealClearPolitics gets the award for terrible predictions. From Monday November 6th, 2000:


Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.



http://web.archive.org/web/20001216085300/http://www.realclearpolitics.com/Polls/polls-Electoral_11_06_EC.html

RealClearPolitics = total joke.




First, you link doesn't work.  Second, the premise that a 2-3% win in the popular vote translates into a 397 EV total is usually correct.

They were predicting Bush winning by 9.3 points instead of Gore winning by 0.5 points. As for the link, yes, sometimes it doesn't work, but if you hit reload a few times, it should load.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: June 22, 2006, 06:01:23 PM »

I say RealClearPolitics gets the award for terrible predictions. From Monday November 6th, 2000:


Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.



http://web.archive.org/web/20001216085300/http://www.realclearpolitics.com/Polls/polls-Electoral_11_06_EC.html

RealClearPolitics = total joke.




First, you link doesn't work.  Second, the premise that a 2-3% win in the popular vote translates into a 397 EV total is usually correct.

They were predicting Bush winning by 9.3 points instead of Gore winning by 0.5 points. As for the link, yes, sometimes it doesn't work, but if you hit reload a few times, it should load.

Okay, I got the link.

No, that was way off, but a small popular vote win, 2% for example, probably will translate into a 297 (not 397) EV total.
Logged
adam
Captain Vlad
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,922


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -5.04

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: June 23, 2006, 05:59:57 AM »

Not as wrong as my prediction was...

Logged
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: June 24, 2006, 09:23:27 AM »

Not as wrong as my prediction was...



That looks to me to have been a very reasonable prediction.

For the 1996 election. Smiley
Logged
adam
Captain Vlad
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,922


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -5.04

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: June 24, 2006, 03:09:22 PM »

Not as wrong as my prediction was...



That looks to me to have been a very reasonable prediction.

For the 1996 election. Smiley

Haha, yeah it would actually. I just thought Gore would landslide that election. He had Bush killed in experience and speaking ability. Boy was I wrong.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,743


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: June 26, 2006, 04:36:26 AM »

Here's Freepers going wild about this.

http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3a0768da11cb.htm


Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: June 26, 2006, 04:21:01 PM »

The best part is that there was only one person of all the comments that actually questioned the validity of RCP's prediction.  I love Free Republic.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,743


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: November 07, 2006, 04:57:37 PM »

The best part is that there was only one person of all the comments that actually questioned the validity of RCP's prediction.  I love Free Republic.

Hey, now, that's not true. There was this comment:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
George W. Hobbes
Mr. Hobbes
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 962


Political Matrix
E: -0.38, S: 1.03

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: November 09, 2006, 10:06:21 PM »

My prediction is 2000 was even worse, I think I said Gore would win TN and Bush would carry CA.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: November 12, 2006, 07:42:23 AM »

This was mine.



Gore/Lieberman - 328- 50.2%
Bush/Cheney - 210 - 47.6%
Logged
poughies
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 919
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: November 25, 2006, 09:25:57 PM »

This year they could have easily had it. There poll average said dems=6 seat gain in the senate. Granted some of the margins were small, but they were all right. And what did they do... they got stupid and decided to off base..... RCP=why did u do that.
Logged
Starbucks Union Thug HokeyPuck
HockeyDude
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,376
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: November 26, 2006, 06:38:52 PM »

My prediction for that election.... was not bad for an 8th grader who had just recently discovered politics, and was rooting big time for Gore : )



It was eithyer that or very close to it
Logged
Reignman
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,236


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -3.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: December 02, 2006, 02:32:03 AM »

i didn't have a prediction really, but if had sat down and thought about it I probably would've guessed:

Image Link

3 states wrong.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,743


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: December 02, 2006, 02:35:15 AM »
« Edited: December 02, 2006, 02:37:02 AM by jfern »

Here's my prediction BTW.
Didn't bother to predict the smaller swing states
PA for Gore
OH for Bush
Figured that it would probably come down to FL, and decided that Gore was slightly favored based upon tracking polls.

Gore ended up doing slightly better in the smaller swing states than I would have guessed. He almost won without FL.
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: December 02, 2006, 02:37:27 AM »

i didn't have a prediction really, but if had sat down and thought about it I probably would've guessed:

Image Link

3 states wrong.

There's Florida, but what are the other two?
Logged
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,597


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: December 02, 2006, 05:59:01 AM »

i didn't have a prediction really, but if had sat down and thought about it I probably would've guessed:

Image Link

3 states wrong.

There's Florida, but what are the other two?

New Mexico & New Hampshire
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: December 02, 2006, 04:20:01 PM »

i didn't have a prediction really, but if had sat down and thought about it I probably would've guessed:

Image Link

3 states wrong.

There's Florida, but what are the other two?

New Mexico & New Hampshire

Oh, right.

I have 2004 embedded in my brain way too much... Tongue
Logged
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,431
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: February 22, 2007, 01:03:24 AM »

Here's a fun link from 2002 -- MyDD was predicting big Democratic gains, including a Democratic House.  And if you scroll down just long enough...you'll see a prediction from a certain Mr. Moderate!

http://web.archive.org/web/20021113060548/www.mydd.com/archives/000216.html

The most frustratingly wrong prediction was Jerome's decision to keep Torricelli in front of Forrester until, quite literally, the day before Torricelli withdrew from the race because he was back by 20+ in the polls.

RCP has nothing on Jerome Armstrong.
Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: March 16, 2007, 01:13:32 PM »

I do not even remember mine from 2000
Logged
adam
Captain Vlad
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,922


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -5.04

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: March 16, 2007, 05:46:42 PM »

Not as wrong as my prediction was...



Why would Gore do better than Clinton did in 1996? You gave Gore Colorado and Virgnia. These did not even go for Clinton in 1996.

I was 10 or 11 in 2000. I rest my case. Tongue
Logged
Dr. Cynic
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,437
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.11, S: -6.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: March 22, 2007, 07:56:05 PM »

Not as wrong as my prediction was...



That looks to me to have been a very reasonable prediction.

For the 1996 election. Smiley

Haha, yeah it would actually. I just thought Gore would landslide that election. He had Bush killed in experience and speaking ability. Boy was I wrong.

It happens.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,917


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: March 22, 2007, 10:17:17 PM »

I had no "prediction", besides that Bush was going to win.

Back then the individual states just didn't seem to matter that much, what mattered was the popular vote.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,491
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: April 05, 2007, 04:15:37 PM »


I doubt you had one considering your age. I didn't even have one.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.088 seconds with 12 queries.