Did this election reveal any new battleground states?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 05:40:53 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  Did this election reveal any new battleground states?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Did this election reveal any new battleground states?  (Read 571 times)
ProgressiveModerate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,750


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 11, 2020, 09:16:19 AM »

Like how 2016 revealed TX had potential to be more competitive down the road
Logged
UncleSam
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,514


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 11, 2020, 09:24:03 AM »

Maybe N.M.? We already knew about Georgia so that doesn’t count, and everything else < 10 points in margin was pretty much expected to be close.
Logged
Roll Roons
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,040
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 11, 2020, 09:24:11 AM »

It confirmed that GA is indeed "there". Could honestly see Democrats now prioritizing it over FL.
Logged
Meatball Ron
recoveringdemocrat
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,284


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 11, 2020, 09:28:28 AM »

Maybe N.M.? We already knew about Georgia so that doesn’t count, and everything else < 10 points in margin was pretty much expected to be close.

The margin in NM was 3 points more Dem this year than it was in 2016, and Biden out-ran Hillary by ~5 points. Depending on the final PV margin, that means it was as Dem this year as in 2016, or more Dem.

Yes, the Senate race was closer than it should've been - but I think the presidential results are probably more indicative here. Not a battleground.
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,268


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 11, 2020, 09:35:32 AM »

Pretty much solidifies AZ and GA as new battlegrounds.
Logged
forsythvoter
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 736


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 11, 2020, 09:37:15 AM »

Not really - I think this election was more notable for revealing which states might not actually be true battlegrounds right now (OH, FL, IA, TX for Rs; MN, VA, CO, NH, ME-Al, NM for Ds).

Of the remaining battleground states (PA, MI, WI, NV, AZ, GA, NC), I think GA was probably the most shocking. This is the first statewide election that Dems have won since 2006 and first Presidential election that Dems have won since 1992 (thanks to Perot). Most people acknowledged the D trends but didn't expect it to flip entirely, given 2018 was such a favorable D year and Abrams still lost by 1.4%.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,751
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 11, 2020, 09:53:37 AM »

Like how 2016 revealed TX had potential to be more competitive down the road

TX isn't gonna to be competetive any longer, Abbott is gonna win reelection and Cruz and Haley are likely to be the next R nominees for Prez and Crenshaw is likely to replace Cruz, get over it, IA and TX aren't battlegrounds, 2024

OH and FL and ME2 will be back competitive, Sherrod Brown is likely to get reelected, ME2 will go back due to Angus King winning reelection in 2024 and Rick Scott is gonna face stiff competetion in 2024
Logged
Sir Mohamed
MohamedChalid
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,727
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 11, 2020, 10:08:32 AM »

Not really, but it confirmed IA and OH are gone for Dems, while CO and VA are gone for the GOP.
Logged
Crumpets
Thinking Crumpets Crumpet
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,733
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.06, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 11, 2020, 10:28:24 AM »

I guess we can start our next "is it there?" clocks, first for Texas in 2024/28, and heck, maybe Kansas for, like, 2036?
Logged
Calthrina950
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,919
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: November 11, 2020, 10:59:19 AM »

It confirmed that GA is indeed "there". Could honestly see Democrats now prioritizing it over FL.

Agreed. I'm still stunned by the extent to which Cubans swung to Trump this year. And once again, Florida has disappointed the Democrats. Given these results, it's hard for me to see DeSantis losing reelection in 2022, and I think the state starts out as Lean R in 2024.
Logged
It’s so Joever
Forumlurker161
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,993


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: November 11, 2020, 11:09:43 AM »

Utah will be a battleground in the future. Blutah is coming.
 If current trends hold....Idaho as well.
Logged
ProgressiveModerate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,750


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: November 11, 2020, 11:15:49 AM »

Utah will be a battleground in the future. Blutah is coming.
 If current trends hold....Idaho as well.

It'll still be a little while, but I agree. SLC still shifted left in UT despite rural UT bouncing back, and that's the part of the state with the most growth, and it's probably safe R for 2024, but under the current re-alignment, UT isn't going back to R + 50 margins. Neither UT or ID bounced back R as hard as many people were expecting.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,156
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: November 11, 2020, 11:25:20 AM »

GA and AZ.

But they could also revert back to R with a normal Republican in 2024 and 2028.

Trump was a pretty abnormal Republican.
Logged
Hope For A New Era
EastOfEden
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,719


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: November 11, 2020, 11:33:29 AM »

Utah will be a battleground in the future. Blutah is coming.
 If current trends hold....Idaho as well.

It's coming!

Salt Lake County
54D/42R
First time over 50% D since 1964
Only the third D win since 1964 (the others were 2008 by literally 296 votes and 2016 because of McMullin)

Utah County
67R/27D
First time over 25% D since 1964
Was over 80% R in 2000 and over 85% R in 2004 and 2012

Davis County
61R/34D
First time over 30% D since 1968
Johnson didn't even win this county

Cache County
65R/29D
First time over 25% D since 1964
Johnson didn't win here either
Over 80% R in 2004 and 2012
Logged
One Term Floridian
swamiG
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,041


Political Matrix
E: -2.06, S: 3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: November 11, 2020, 11:40:08 AM »

Blutah, Blorgia, Blurizona, Blansas, Blexas, Nebluska, and depending on final margins, maybe Blaska

Potentials for GOP as well:

Redvada, New Redico, Red Island, and depending on final margins, maybe New YoRed
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,662
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: November 11, 2020, 11:44:09 AM »

It confirmed that GA is indeed "there". Could honestly see Democrats now prioritizing it over FL.

Agreed. I'm still stunned by the extent to which Cubans swung to Trump this year. And once again, Florida has disappointed the Democrats. Given these results, it's hard for me to see DeSantis losing reelection in 2022, and I think the state starts out as Lean R in 2024.

Yeah, Florida just isn't worth it for national Democrats anymore.  If Fried can get reelected, she should try for governor when it's open in 2026.  It might flip if a Republican is president, but that's about it.
Logged
It’s so Joever
Forumlurker161
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,993


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: November 11, 2020, 11:47:59 AM »

Utah will be a battleground in the future. Blutah is coming.
 If current trends hold....Idaho as well.

It's coming!

Salt Lake County
54D/42R
First time over 50% D since 1964
Only the third D win since 1964 (the others were 2008 by literally 296 votes and 2016 because of McMullin)

Utah County
67R/27D
First time over 25% D since 1964
Was over 80% R in 2000 and over 85% R in 2004 and 2012

Davis County
61R/34D
First time over 30% D since 1968
Johnson didn't even win this county

Cache County
65R/29D
First time over 25% D since 1964
Johnson didn't win here either
Over 80% R in 2004 and 2012
I will be alive to see this 2056 NUT electoral map:
https://www.yapms.com/app/?m=4uy3

The #realignment
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.038 seconds with 12 queries.