Kilpatrick's effect on Granholm
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 08:57:07 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Kilpatrick's effect on Granholm
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: How will Kwame Kilpatrick (& his re-election) effect on Granholm
#1
->5%
 
#2
-2.5%-5%
 
#3
-<2.5%
 
#4
No effect at all
 
#5
+<2.5%
 
#6
+2.5%-5%
 
#7
+>5%
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 12

Author Topic: Kilpatrick's effect on Granholm  (Read 1163 times)
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: June 15, 2006, 09:03:50 AM »

I'm really curious, especially from Wayne Co. area voters who are involved in Det. politics.  I personally think he will have a minimal effect around -2% b/c once he started going crooked (or at least when it came out publically), Granholm distanced herself--which was a smart move.
Logged
Dave from Michigan
9iron768
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,298
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: June 15, 2006, 08:19:16 PM »

I don't think there will be much of an effect as long as Granholm stays way from him. He is very unpopular in the suburbs like 89% disapproval.  The whole city suburbs water issue could have some affect Granholm opposes the bill to take away control of the water department form Detroit and make a tri county board. but even this will have a minimal effect if any.
Logged
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: June 15, 2006, 08:32:35 PM »

He helps pump up turnout in Detroit but hurts with swing voters in the suburbs and elsewhere. In a midterm, in which turnout overall is low, I'd say it's a wash.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: June 16, 2006, 04:01:15 PM »

Just curious--what was the rationale behind the +5% by whoever voted for that?
Logged
Cashcow
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,843


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: June 16, 2006, 07:04:57 PM »

It will have basically no effect, if any at all. Suburban Michiganians generally assume that whoever is the mayor of Detroit will invariably be involved with loads of corruption, so it probably won't affect many votes.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: June 16, 2006, 09:28:54 PM »

It will have basically no effect, if any at all. Suburban Michiganians generally assume that whoever is the mayor of Detroit will invariably be involved with loads of corruption, so it probably won't affect many votes.

True about the corruption, but a corrupt Dem. still hurts the party even if it's expected.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.035 seconds with 14 queries.