CONGRESSIONAL RESULTS MEGA THREAD
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 17, 2024, 09:41:30 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  CONGRESSIONAL RESULTS MEGA THREAD
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 23 24 25 26 27 [28] 29 30 31 32 33 ... 89
Author Topic: CONGRESSIONAL RESULTS MEGA THREAD  (Read 68612 times)
2016
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,616


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #675 on: November 10, 2020, 07:30:13 PM »

When can we expect the first absentee dumps from NY?

This is all I've seen so far.

Katko though had a 55K lead on Election Night so Balter would need to make up a lot of Ground.

I'm still very much convinced Tenney & Malliotakis win here!
Logged
Tekken_Guy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,136
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #676 on: November 10, 2020, 07:39:23 PM »

I think Garcia still wins with the LA later dumps (maybe provisionals?) breaking R, but it will definitely be close.

Not sure about #CA21, but my instinct is that the race ends up bouncing between 51-52-48-49 Valadao-Cox with continuously less Democratic Kerns updates balanced by everything else. But I don't have a really good handle on the vote count there.

Biden won the first batch of Onandaga (Syracuse) mail-ins 80-17 (he had been winning the county 53-44) which makes me really curious about NY-22. Brindisi needs like 76% of the mail-ins assuming no ballots are disqualified and I think he'll get close.

For NJ-07, the reason I'm so sure that Kean will win is that everything out seems to be provisional and he'll net more from them in every county. It's just basic partisan vote disparity stuff, Joe Biden didn't even win the in-person votes in Mecklenburg County.

CA-25: I really like Mike Garcia and hope he wins. It'd be really weird so see him losing in this environment given what's happening downballot.

UT-4: I feel pretty confident that Owens will win at this point. McAdams is the last of the extremely vulnerable house Democrats (Peterson, Horn, Cunningham, Torres-Small, Rose, Brindisi) who haven't lost yet or are clearly headed for defeat.

NY-22: I'm confident Tenney's got this.

NJ-07: Hunterdon and Somerset seem to say otherwise. They're fully in and Malinowski is doing better than Clinton in both counties.
Logged
2016
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,616


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #677 on: November 10, 2020, 07:43:26 PM »

New Alaska Results to be announced 9pm ET/5pm Alaska Time. Vote counting started this morning at 9am Alaska Time.

So, we could know in the next 75 Minutes if Dan Sullivan is reelected!
Logged
n1240
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,207


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #678 on: November 10, 2020, 08:16:06 PM »

https://www.wktv.com/content/news/Counting-of-absentee-ballots-underway-in-22nd-congressional-district-573033491.html

"Cortland County has finished; 3545 of their absentees went to Brindisi, 1101 to Tenney, and 130 to Libertarian, Keith Price."

Brindisi up 7% overall in the county based on this info, running behind his margin by 4% in 2018. Feels like he needs to run up the score in Broome and Oneida to have a chance, otherwise he'll probably fall a few points short.
Logged
Tekken_Guy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,136
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #679 on: November 10, 2020, 08:49:31 PM »

https://www.wktv.com/content/news/Counting-of-absentee-ballots-underway-in-22nd-congressional-district-573033491.html

"Cortland County has finished; 3545 of their absentees went to Brindisi, 1101 to Tenney, and 130 to Libertarian, Keith Price."

Brindisi up 7% overall in the county based on this info, running behind his margin by 4% in 2018. Feels like he needs to run up the score in Broome and Oneida to have a chance, otherwise he'll probably fall a few points short.

Brindisi winning would be a pleasant surprise for Democrats in this awful cycle. With McAdams’ hopes fading, he could be the ”lone survivor” instead.
Logged
Matty
boshembechle
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #680 on: November 10, 2020, 08:50:45 PM »

GOP candidate declares victory in Iowa 2nd
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,451
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #681 on: November 10, 2020, 08:50:54 PM »

https://www.wktv.com/content/news/Counting-of-absentee-ballots-underway-in-22nd-congressional-district-573033491.html

"Cortland County has finished; 3545 of their absentees went to Brindisi, 1101 to Tenney, and 130 to Libertarian, Keith Price."

Brindisi up 7% overall in the county based on this info, running behind his margin by 4% in 2018. Feels like he needs to run up the score in Broome and Oneida to have a chance, otherwise he'll probably fall a few points short.

Brindisi winning would be a pleasant surprise for Democrats in this awful cycle. With McAdams’ hopes fading, he could be the ”lone survivor” instead.

McAdams is far from finished, but Brindisi winning would be great!
Logged
2016
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,616


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #682 on: November 10, 2020, 08:54:56 PM »

It looks like this is Final pending a Recount



Mariannette Miller-Meeks (R) 196,852

Rita Hart (D) 196,812

See here

https://electionresults.iowa.gov/IA/106279/web.264614/#/summary

Miller-Meeks seems to have won by 40 Votes.
Logged
Roll Roons
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,078
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #683 on: November 10, 2020, 08:54:58 PM »

Are there a lot of absentees left in Iowa? NYT says only 89% is reporting in IA-02.
Logged
2016
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,616


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #684 on: November 10, 2020, 08:56:55 PM »

Are there a lot of absentees left in Iowa? NYT says only 89% is reporting in IA-02.

NYT is wrong. If all of the 24 Counties have canvassed their Results then Absentees have to be included in this canvassed count!
Logged
KaiserDave
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,640
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -5.39

P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #685 on: November 10, 2020, 08:59:49 PM »

Republican victory declarations mean nothing, but Meeks is favored. When all is said and done I expect the Republicans to net around 10 seats.
Logged
GALeftist
sansymcsansface
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,741


Political Matrix
E: -7.29, S: -9.48

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #686 on: November 10, 2020, 09:02:59 PM »

It looks like this is Final pending a Recount



Mariannette Miller-Meeks (R) 196,852

Rita Hart (D) 196,812

See here

https://electionresults.iowa.gov/IA/106279/web.264614/#/summary

Miller-Meeks seems to have won by 40 Votes.

Unlike certain other examples we've seen lately, this is definitely a recount margin.
Logged
Tekken_Guy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,136
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #687 on: November 10, 2020, 09:08:36 PM »

Republican victory declarations mean nothing, but Meeks is favored. When all is said and done I expect the Republicans to net around 10 seats.

So, that’s -3 seats as a baseline (NC-02, NC-06, GA-07)

-3. MN-07
-2. OK-05
-1. SC-01
1. NY-11
2. NY-22
3. IA-01
4. FL-26
5. FL-27
6. CA-39
7. CA-48
8. NM-02
9. MI-03
10. IA-02
11 (10 w/o CA-25): CA-21
12 (11 w/o CA-25): UT-04
13 (12 w/o CA-25): NJ-07
Logged
KaiserDave
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,640
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -5.39

P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #688 on: November 10, 2020, 09:10:39 PM »

Republican victory declarations mean nothing, but Meeks is favored. When all is said and done I expect the Republicans to net around 10 seats.

So, that’s -3 seats as a baseline (NC-02, NC-06, GA-07)

-3. MN-07
-2. OK-05
-1. SC-01
1. NY-11
2. NY-22
3. IA-01
4. FL-26
5. FL-27
6. CA-39
7. CA-48
8. NM-02
9. MI-03
10. IA-02
11 (10 w/o CA-25): CA-21
12 (11 w/o CA-25): UT-04
13 (12 w/o CA-25): NJ-07

Malinowski is going to win

I expect Smith to win, and probably a surprise perhaps from NY or one of the other races.
Logged
2016
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,616


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #689 on: November 10, 2020, 09:14:41 PM »

Republican victory declarations mean nothing, but Meeks is favored. When all is said and done I expect the Republicans to net around 10 seats.

So, that’s -3 seats as a baseline (NC-02, NC-06, GA-07)

-3. MN-07
-2. OK-05
-1. SC-01
1. NY-11
2. NY-22
3. IA-01
4. FL-26
5. FL-27
6. CA-39
7. CA-48
8. NM-02
9. MI-03
10. IA-02
11 (10 w/o CA-25): CA-21
12 (11 w/o CA-25): UT-04
13 (12 w/o CA-25): NJ-07

Malinowski is going to win

I expect Smith to win, and probably a surprise perhaps from NY or one of the other races.
I can give you NJ-7 (Malinowski) and CA-25 (Smith). The others so called surprised in NY: Forget about it. Not going to happen!
Logged
KaiserDave
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,640
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -5.39

P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #690 on: November 10, 2020, 09:15:13 PM »

Republican victory declarations mean nothing, but Meeks is favored. When all is said and done I expect the Republicans to net around 10 seats.

So, that’s -3 seats as a baseline (NC-02, NC-06, GA-07)

-3. MN-07
-2. OK-05
-1. SC-01
1. NY-11
2. NY-22
3. IA-01
4. FL-26
5. FL-27
6. CA-39
7. CA-48
8. NM-02
9. MI-03
10. IA-02
11 (10 w/o CA-25): CA-21
12 (11 w/o CA-25): UT-04
13 (12 w/o CA-25): NJ-07

Malinowski is going to win

I expect Smith to win, and probably a surprise perhaps from NY or one of the other races.
I can give you NJ-7 (Malinowski) and CA-25 (Smith). The others so called surprised in NY: Forget about it. Not going to happen!

ok sure
Logged
GALeftist
sansymcsansface
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,741


Political Matrix
E: -7.29, S: -9.48

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #691 on: November 10, 2020, 09:43:53 PM »
« Edited: November 10, 2020, 10:03:04 PM by BLORGIA, FIRST OF ITS NAME, BANE OF MILLENIALMODERATE »

OK, so the NYT has it at 218 D to 201 R with 16 remaining. It looks like LA-05 is going to a runoff, but the Democrat might not even make it in and I don't think anyone seriously thinks she stands a chance, so we can toss it to the Rs for 202. Here's my analysis of the rest:

CA-21: There are enough votes left that I'm not going to say Cox is out, but I haven't seen encouraging news, I don't think. Likely R, Rs at 203.

CA-25: Razor thin, almost certainly recount territory and idk how the rest of the votes will go. Tossup.

CA-39: This really should have been called already. Safe R, Rs at 204.

UT-04: Certainly does not look encouraging for McAdams. Utah is a bad state. Likely R bordering on Safe, Rs at 205.

IA-02: This one's really recount territory. Tossup, edge Miller-Meeks.

IL-14: Also should have been called already, better luck next time GOP. Safe D, Ds at 219.

NY-24: That's a thicc margin for Katko. Likely R bordering on Safe, Rs at 206.

NY-22: Also a pretty good margin for Tenney even though she is bad. Thanks upstate NY. Likely R bordering on Safe, Rs at 207.

NY-19: Delgado is already winning and I don't think the margin is getting any friendlier for Rs. Likely D bordering on Safe, Ds at 220.

NY-18: Same story as the 19th.  Likely D, Ds at 221.

NY-03: I'd be quite surprised if absentees don't pull Suozzi over the finish line. Likely D, Ds at 222.

NY-02: In contrast, this margin seems titanic. Likely R bordering on safe, Rs at 208.

NY-01: Same story as the 2nd but more. Safe R, Rs at 209.

NY-11: Looks like Malliotakis has the margin to win. Get pranked Rose. Likely R, Rs at 210.

AK-AL: Frankly I think Al Gross was the one sleeping, because unless he knows for certain that the next two dumps are going to be substantially more D-leaning than the most recent one, I have no reason to believe there's an Alaskan upset in the cards, either for PRES, SEN, or AK-AL. Likely R bordering on Safe (and I think that's pretty generous all things considered), Rs at 211.

Does this seem about right to everyone?

EDIT: Forgot that NYT called NJ-07 already, which posters here take issue with. It seems like Malinowski has a fair margin, but I'm certainly not going to rule out a Cox scenario. Lean/Likely D?
Logged
LimoLiberal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,535


Political Matrix
E: -3.71, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #692 on: November 10, 2020, 09:44:23 PM »

https://www.wktv.com/content/news/Counting-of-absentee-ballots-underway-in-22nd-congressional-district-573033491.html

"Cortland County has finished; 3545 of their absentees went to Brindisi, 1101 to Tenney, and 130 to Libertarian, Keith Price."

Brindisi up 7% overall in the county based on this info, running behind his margin by 4% in 2018. Feels like he needs to run up the score in Broome and Oneida to have a chance, otherwise he'll probably fall a few points short.

Calling it for Tenney based off that info.
Logged
Tekken_Guy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,136
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #693 on: November 10, 2020, 09:46:13 PM »

So I guess the lone survivor was....Jared Golden!
Logged
Matty
boshembechle
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #694 on: November 10, 2020, 09:47:05 PM »

Alaska just dumped 50,000 ballots

Logged
100% pro-life no matter what
ExtremeRepublican
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,769


Political Matrix
E: 7.35, S: 5.57


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #695 on: November 10, 2020, 09:51:31 PM »

OK, so the NYT has it at 218 D to 201 R with 16 remaining. I believe CA-34, which is between two Democrats, is not being counted, so we can toss it to the Dems for 219. Conversely, it looks like LA-05 is going to a runoff, but the Democrat might not even make it in and I don't think anyone seriously thinks she stands a chance, so we can toss it to the Rs for 202. Here's my analysis of the rest:

CA-21: There are enough votes left that I'm not going to say Cox is out, but I haven't seen encouraging news, I don't think. Likely R, Rs at 203.

CA-25: Razor thin, almost certainly recount territory and idk how the rest of the votes will go. Tossup.

CA-39: This really should have been called already. Safe R, Rs at 204.

UT-04: Certainly does not look encouraging for McAdams. Utah is a bad state. Likely R bordering on Safe, Rs at 205.

IA-02: This one's really recount territory. Tossup, edge Miller-Meeks.

IL-14: Also should have been called already, better luck next time GOP. Safe D, Ds at 220.

NY-24: That's a thicc margin for Katko. Likely R bordering on Safe, Rs at 206.

NY-22: Also a pretty good margin for Tenney even though she is bad. Thanks upstate NY. Likely R bordering on Safe, Rs at 207.

NY-19: Delgado is already winning and I don't think the margin is getting any friendlier for Rs. Likely D bordering on Safe, Ds at 221.

NY-18: Same story as the 19th.  Likely D, Ds at 222.

NY-03: I'd be quite surprised if absentees don't pull Suozzi over the finish line. Likely D, Ds at 223.

NY-02: In contrast, this margin seems titanic. Likely R bordering on safe, Rs at 208.

NY-01: Same story as the 2nd but more. Safe R, Rs at 209.

NY-11: Looks like Malliotakis has the margin to win. Get pranked Rose. Likely R, Rs at 210.

Does this seem about right to everyone?

EDIT: Forgot that NYT called NJ-07 already, which posters here take issue with. It seems like Malinowski has a fair margin, but I'm certainly not going to rule out a Cox scenario. Lean/Likely D?

I think CA-34 is already in the Democrats' total of 218, because there are 16 races out there not counting it:

CA- 21, 25, 39
NY- 1, 2, 3, 11, 18, 19, 22, 24
UT-4
AK-1
IA-2
IL-14
LA-5
Logged
Tekken_Guy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,136
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #696 on: November 10, 2020, 09:51:32 PM »

OK, so the NYT has it at 218 D to 201 R with 16 remaining. I believe CA-34, which is between two Democrats, is not being counted, so we can toss it to the Dems for 219. Conversely, it looks like LA-05 is going to a runoff, but the Democrat might not even make it in and I don't think anyone seriously thinks she stands a chance, so we can toss it to the Rs for 202. Here's my analysis of the rest:

CA-21: There are enough votes left that I'm not going to say Cox is out, but I haven't seen encouraging news, I don't think. Likely R, Rs at 203.

CA-25: Razor thin, almost certainly recount territory and idk how the rest of the votes will go. Tossup.

CA-39: This really should have been called already. Safe R, Rs at 204.

UT-04: Certainly does not look encouraging for McAdams. Utah is a bad state. Likely R bordering on Safe, Rs at 205.

IA-02: This one's really recount territory. Tossup, edge Miller-Meeks.

IL-14: Also should have been called already, better luck next time GOP. Safe D, Ds at 220.

NY-24: That's a thicc margin for Katko. Likely R bordering on Safe, Rs at 206.

NY-22: Also a pretty good margin for Tenney even though she is bad. Thanks upstate NY. Likely R bordering on Safe, Rs at 207.

NY-19: Delgado is already winning and I don't think the margin is getting any friendlier for Rs. Likely D bordering on Safe, Ds at 221.

NY-18: Same story as the 19th.  Likely D, Ds at 222.

NY-03: I'd be quite surprised if absentees don't pull Suozzi over the finish line. Likely D, Ds at 223.

NY-02: In contrast, this margin seems titanic. Likely R bordering on safe, Rs at 208.

NY-01: Same story as the 2nd but more. Safe R, Rs at 209.

NY-11: Looks like Malliotakis has the margin to win. Get pranked Rose. Likely R, Rs at 210.

Does this seem about right to everyone?

EDIT: Forgot that NYT called NJ-07 already, which posters here take issue with. It seems like Malinowski has a fair margin, but I'm certainly not going to rule out a Cox scenario. Lean/Likely D?

Kean is underperforming Trump’s 2016 numbers across the board in the district. That’s probably not what he wants,
Logged
LimoLiberal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,535


Political Matrix
E: -3.71, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #697 on: November 10, 2020, 09:52:00 PM »

OK, so the NYT has it at 218 D to 201 R with 16 remaining. I believe CA-34, which is between two Democrats, is not being counted, so we can toss it to the Dems for 219. Conversely, it looks like LA-05 is going to a runoff, but the Democrat might not even make it in and I don't think anyone seriously thinks she stands a chance, so we can toss it to the Rs for 202. Here's my analysis of the rest:

CA-21: There are enough votes left that I'm not going to say Cox is out, but I haven't seen encouraging news, I don't think. Likely R, Rs at 203.

CA-25: Razor thin, almost certainly recount territory and idk how the rest of the votes will go. Tossup.

CA-39: This really should have been called already. Safe R, Rs at 204.

UT-04: Certainly does not look encouraging for McAdams. Utah is a bad state. Likely R bordering on Safe, Rs at 205.

IA-02: This one's really recount territory. Tossup, edge Miller-Meeks.

IL-14: Also should have been called already, better luck next time GOP. Safe D, Ds at 220.

NY-24: That's a thicc margin for Katko. Likely R bordering on Safe, Rs at 206.

NY-22: Also a pretty good margin for Tenney even though she is bad. Thanks upstate NY. Likely R bordering on Safe, Rs at 207.

NY-19: Delgado is already winning and I don't think the margin is getting any friendlier for Rs. Likely D bordering on Safe, Ds at 221.

NY-18: Same story as the 19th.  Likely D, Ds at 222.

NY-03: I'd be quite surprised if absentees don't pull Suozzi over the finish line. Likely D, Ds at 223.

NY-02: In contrast, this margin seems titanic. Likely R bordering on safe, Rs at 208.

NY-01: Same story as the 2nd but more. Safe R, Rs at 209.

NY-11: Looks like Malliotakis has the margin to win. Get pranked Rose. Likely R, Rs at 210.

Does this seem about right to everyone?

Yeah, but Malinowski's going to lose in NJ-07 and CA-10 will be closer than expected, though Harder will still probably win.
Logged
LimoLiberal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,535


Political Matrix
E: -3.71, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #698 on: November 10, 2020, 09:54:33 PM »

OK, so the NYT has it at 218 D to 201 R with 16 remaining. I believe CA-34, which is between two Democrats, is not being counted, so we can toss it to the Dems for 219. Conversely, it looks like LA-05 is going to a runoff, but the Democrat might not even make it in and I don't think anyone seriously thinks she stands a chance, so we can toss it to the Rs for 202. Here's my analysis of the rest:

CA-21: There are enough votes left that I'm not going to say Cox is out, but I haven't seen encouraging news, I don't think. Likely R, Rs at 203.

CA-25: Razor thin, almost certainly recount territory and idk how the rest of the votes will go. Tossup.

CA-39: This really should have been called already. Safe R, Rs at 204.

UT-04: Certainly does not look encouraging for McAdams. Utah is a bad state. Likely R bordering on Safe, Rs at 205.

IA-02: This one's really recount territory. Tossup, edge Miller-Meeks.

IL-14: Also should have been called already, better luck next time GOP. Safe D, Ds at 220.

NY-24: That's a thicc margin for Katko. Likely R bordering on Safe, Rs at 206.

NY-22: Also a pretty good margin for Tenney even though she is bad. Thanks upstate NY. Likely R bordering on Safe, Rs at 207.

NY-19: Delgado is already winning and I don't think the margin is getting any friendlier for Rs. Likely D bordering on Safe, Ds at 221.

NY-18: Same story as the 19th.  Likely D, Ds at 222.

NY-03: I'd be quite surprised if absentees don't pull Suozzi over the finish line. Likely D, Ds at 223.

NY-02: In contrast, this margin seems titanic. Likely R bordering on safe, Rs at 208.

NY-01: Same story as the 2nd but more. Safe R, Rs at 209.

NY-11: Looks like Malliotakis has the margin to win. Get pranked Rose. Likely R, Rs at 210.

Does this seem about right to everyone?

EDIT: Forgot that NYT called NJ-07 already, which posters here take issue with. It seems like Malinowski has a fair margin, but I'm certainly not going to rule out a Cox scenario. Lean/Likely D?

Kean is underperforming Trump’s 2016 numbers across the board in the district. That’s probably not what he wants,

Have faith.
Logged
Benjamin Frank
Frank
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,066


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #699 on: November 10, 2020, 09:57:58 PM »

Alaska just dumped 50,000 ballots



The suspense was killing me. :/
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 23 24 25 26 27 [28] 29 30 31 32 33 ... 89  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.082 seconds with 12 queries.